That's why I'm not buying the release edition. Let them fix all the bugs and gameplay imbalances first. And add MULTIPLAYER.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
I'm getting the impression this game is not a worthy successor to civ I and II
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
I'm getting the impression this game is not a worthy successor to civ I and II
Any views I may express here are personal and certainly do not in any way reflect the views of my employer. Tis the rising of the moon..
Look, I just don't anymore, okay?Tags: None
-
Ahh, it's okay. It's what I hoped it would be, and it's what I feared it would be. In other words, clever & innovative features, along with some serious drawbacks.
This was predictable as soon as it was known that there would be only "in-house" testing, thus assuring that there wouldn't be any stop-ship bugs brought to management's attention (if the testers knew what was good for them).
Too bad. But it'll be a really great game six months to a year from now."When all else fails, a pigheaded refusal to look facts in the face will see us through." -- General Sir Anthony Cecil Hogmanay Melchett
Comment
-
Originally posted by monkspider
You may get that impression, however that impression would be dreadfully mistaken
I too am under the same impression and have yet to make my deposit into the Bank of Firaxis. I'm waiting for patches and MP as well.
What I have a hard time with are the people cheering the game when, from what I've heard, there are some serious bugs -- like the airpower-SAM thing in particular. The lack of MP has also wrecked havoc on my appreciation for the Sid legacy and should they proceed to offer it in a expansion only type scenario, well, I'll turn my attention to Masters of Orion III and take my business elsewhere.
Let's keep our fingers crossed.
Comment
-
The ironic paradox of this whole buisness is that the only ones complaining about excessive bugs are those who don't own the game.
Being one who has throughly played the game for a solid 2 weeks, I can happily report there being no serious gameplay-disrupting bugs. Lack of MP is unfortunate to be sure, but it too shall come in time.
http://monkspider.blogspot.com/
Comment
-
Don't give up on us baby...
It has the POTENTIAL to be a worthy successor - but the changes required may be more than Firaxis is willing to make.
We'll see. Don't give up on it yet, for all the really bad things, there are a couple really nice touches. They can correct the bad and make it a very very good game.
Venger
Comment
-
Originally posted by monkspider
The ironic paradox of this whole buisness is that the only ones complaining about excessive bugs are those who don't own the game.
Being one who has throughly played the game for a solid 2 weeks, I can happily report there being no serious gameplay-disrupting bugs. Lack of MP is unfortunate to be sure, but it too shall come in time.
However, I don't care for MP, and I'm certain that the corruption bug and air unit bugs will be fixed. Also, I'm pretty sure they will resolved the scenario editor issues.
Otherwise, I still think it's the best of the Civ line. I remember the initial bugs in Civ2 and the heavy patching that went on with that game.
Now if they would only add SETI Contact as a victory condition."Barbarism is the natural state of mankind... Civilization is unnatural. It is a whim of circumstance. And barbarism must always triumph."
Comment
-
Originally posted by uh Clem
But it'll be a really great game six months to a year from now.
Any views I may express here are personal and certainly do not in any way reflect the views of my employer. Tis the rising of the moon..
Look, I just don't anymore, okay?
Comment
-
Originally posted by paiktis22
trollin'
trollin'
trollin'
now the threads
are swollen'
horsie,
next time you wont to post your "impressions" please include some actual arguments.
thank youCo-Founder, Apolyton Civilization Site
Co-Owner/Webmaster, Top40-Charts.com | CTO, Apogee Information Systems
giannopoulos.info: my non-mobile non-photo news & articles blog
Comment
Comment