A time to brag! Post your civilization score!

[YefeiPi]

Well, please post in this format:

Score:
Civ played:
Year:
Difficulty level:

Here is mine:

580
Chinese
1845
Chieftain

How about yours?

[Akaoz]

Score: 2166
Civ: French
Year: 2036
Diff: Regent
Cultural Victory (I was trying to get dominance though...)

-Alech

[tb_Shibaguchi]

Konichiwa

Score: 2230
Civ: The Glorious Japanese CIvilization
Year: 2045
Diff: Regent

[Ankh]

Score: 2868
Civ played: Chinese (Went Random)
Year: 2038
Difficulty level: Regent
Map: Medium Earth


Tried to win by culture but didnt make it so I ended up with a Space race victory.

Had all North + South + Australia. Dont understand why ppl complain so much about corruption if corruption were lower I could easy have taken over the whole world.


Ps: I used Communism as goverment

[Provost Harrison]

OK, lemme see:

2840 French - Warlord

Cultural (Won)

Sometime in the 18th century, can't remember when exactly...

[pacifist]

Russians
Regent
Military Victory
Tiny Map
3 other civs
12809

[Pyrodrew]

The Myth

Dont understand why ppl complain so much about corruption if corruption were lower I could easy have taken over the whole world.

That's the biggest myth there is. Less corruption will help the AI more than it does you. You can use leaders, rush build courthouses, workers, & fine tune *each aspect* of *each city*etc. etc. to offset corruption MUCH better than the AI can. The AI is stuck with the worthless governors & gets halted in it's tracks at any large empire because of corruption, this allows you to continue to expand where they cannot. I'm looking forward to that patch!

[Ray K]

Re: The Myth

Originally posted by Pyrodrew


That's the biggest myth there is. Less corruption will help the AI more than it does you. You can use leaders, rush build courthouses, workers, & fine tune *each aspect* of *each city*etc. etc. to offset corruption MUCH better than the AI can. The AI is stuck with the worthless governors & gets halted in it's tracks at any large empire because of corruption, this allows you to continue to expand where they cannot. I'm looking forward to that patch!

You mean there isn't some virtual forum where all of the AI governors in Civ3 are getting together and figuring out strategies to get around corruption so they can beat the human players?

Interesting take -- I hadn't thought of it like that.

[Pyrodrew]

Re: Re: The Myth

Originally posted by Ray K
You mean there isn't some virtual forum where all of the AI governors in Civ3 are getting together and figuring out strategies to get around corruption so they can beat the human players?
Interesting take -- I hadn't thought of it like that.

Yes surprising that there isn't an AI virtual forum. But more importantly the AI isn't programmed to solve corruption (viewing their cities prove that) & fine tune cities like we do. Hope that cleared up your confusion.

[VetteroX]

Jesus why are people playing on such low difficulties? I got 3400 something on Monarch with the Americans won with space race and like 3100 Germans Monarch diff on conqure entire world.

[Fidel]

Originally posted by VetteroX
Jesus why are people playing on such low difficulties? I got 3400 something on Monarch with the Americans won with space race and like 3100 Germans Monarch diff on conqure entire world.

coz we are not worthy. you, on the other hand, are soooooo cool. i wonder why you hang out with us at all

[Eli]

920 with the Persians, chieftain level, year ~2020.

[CBH]

1150 with Iroquois in 1960 - unfortunately I have no oil, and in fact can't find a single oil on the map (apart from one off-shore one, which is useless), so I guess I'll just have to grind the Americans down with Cavalry/Artillery combos and go for the long haul...

[Comrade Tribune]

Score: 1602
Civ: Romans
Year: 1800
Diff: Regent
Type: Domination

This was only my 2nd game, so I´m quite happy with the result.

[Dis]

I think around 2000. my second game. my first was less than 1000.