I was reading a review for Civ 3, the reviewere said that there would not be a lot of new technologies (or very few for that mmatter) in the modern age. Now if call to power can have technologies that are very futristic (such as fusion tanks) why can theye be in CIV3 DO the creators want more of an emphisis on the "history"aspect?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Historilization 3?
Collapse
X
-
I am glad they didn't add techs just for the sake of adding techs. That is why CTP 1 and 2 failed is because they believed more is better rather than the idea that less, well balanced, is great."To live again, to be.........again" Captain Kirk in some Star Trek Episode. (The one with the bad guy named Henok)
"One day you may have to think for yourself and heaven help us all when that time comes" Some condescending jerk.
-
Civ Is History- that is what makes it different and that is why is has sold throught the years- Firaxis' Alpha Centauri Experiment did not sell as well as they would have wished- people can identify better with historical details... and it is more work to create plausible, polished, balanced theoretical technologies.-->Visit CGN!
-->"Production! More Production! Production creates Wealth! Production creates more Jobs!"-Wendell Willkie -1944
Comment
Comment