The Civ III and Sid interview in a Finnish magazine

[Rasbelin]

I'm starting a new thread on my translation,
because there's no other thread for it.

Now, I can answer here any questions, comments or
other inquiries.

I must add that there was screenshots from
the game, but I didn't include them, because they
have already been seen here.

BTW, I suppose that was the first Sid interview
on Civilization that has been published in its
full length at Ape; or at least translation.

P.S. If you don't know what translation I'm
talking about, check the Ape's Civ III news, where Dan has posted
something.
_____________________________________________
Added later: Here's a direct link to the translation
(HTML and RTF versions available): Click here for the translation!

[connorkimbro]

A fine job, Rasbelin, thanks for your efforts!

[Rasbelin]

Thanks, Connorkimbro!

Sadly it looks like you're the only one
who has been pleased with the article.
Poor me...

[lockstep]

I liked the article, too. Two quotes that are really important, IMO:

During the war, the cities resist the occupation until signing of a peace treatment between the fighting nations. After the peace treatment the city still keeps its national identity and might even turn up against the new occupants.

This may well be the explanation of the 'Madras screenshot' (three very angry Indian citizens under Roman rule - they don´t work tiles and seem to need no food).

The computer doesn't fight wars anymore for its evilness, but instead the wars are based on some goal to be achieved by the computer leader. If the computer nation needs oil and the player isn't willing to trade that, this might start a war of valuable oil fields.

This raises my hopes regarding the AI still further (they have been high since I read about Soren Johnsons AI programming background).

Thanks for the translation, Rasbelin.

[Jusbaummer]

You're a real translation master!

[Jusbaummer]

Great Finland Idealism

<----- What do you think?


( I wonder why they closed new zealand thread... )

[Rege]

Good article, good reading.

Thanks Rasbelin.

[Rasbelin]

Originally posted by lockstep

This may well be the explanation of the 'Madras screenshot' (three very angry Indian citizens under Roman rule - they don´t work tiles and seem to need no food).

My opinion is that you have just found the answer
to that clue.

This raises my hopes regarding the AI still further (they have been high since I read about Soren Johnsons AI programming background).

Well, it simply means that the AI can use logic.
A human acts reasonable (or is supposed to do so ),
but an AI uses algorithms.

Thanks for the translation, Rasbelin.

You're welcome!

It was just fun and enjoyable to
translate Sid's thoughts on the gaming industry;
and hey, he revealed that he actually "respects"
the makers of Age of Empires in some way.
This is something ground breaking!
Sid is an AoE fan!?!

[August Borms]

The article is pretty interesting...

Thanks Rasbelin

[Rasbelin]

Originally posted by Jusbaummer
What do you think?

A nationalistic Finn?

*plays the Finnish national anthem on the background*

[Rasbelin]

I must admit that the article explains the resource
system quite clearly, and I think it's the only resource
where I have seen that hiding of resources mentioned.

The player doesn't see any hidden nature resources
out in the terrain, before the technology for using
them has been invented. The capital might bee in the
middle of the world's richest uranium deposit, but you
won't get a hint about that before the scientists have
split their atoms. Nature resources can be accessed,
when they have been connected to a city with a road.
If the deposit is outside the city's limits, only a road
isn't enough, but also a mining colony built by a worker,
which will disappear after that, is needed. After this all
cities linked to the same road network can use the
deposit. In theory every nation needs only one deposit
of every nature resource.

-cut-

Nature resources don't only give bonuses, but they're
also vital for producing units and buildings.
Swordsmen need iron for their weapons and railroads coal.
The missing material has to be bought from wealthier
nations or taking it over by warfare. Destroying or
surrounding a crucial trading route is a very powerful
strategy.

[El hidalgo]

Rasbelin, great job! I found it especially interesting that the AI now will have reasons for going to war (besides "you're too powerful, therefore I will attack you, as in Civ 2 ).

By the way, I turned the translation into HTML, if anyone is interested in hosting or having it. Nothing fancy or exciting, mind you, but if you prefer to read it in a browser, it might be your cup of tea. So whoever wants it, let me know.

[connorkimbro]

Rasbelin, great job! I found it especially interesting that the AI now will have reasons for going to war

Yes, if done well, this could REALLY enhance the atmosphere, enabling the player to add much more depth to the "story" that in previous civ games. Before, when the AI made an attack, it was always just irritating. For no reason, a sneak attack. Bastards. But now, hey, i have oil! They need oil! I'm fighting to protect my oil! That's exciting, i think!. Hopefully such things come out in the diplomacy screen, and if the AI really makes a concerted effort to get what it wants/needs, that would be awesome. That would bring so much more life to the game, IMO.

[Rasbelin]

Originally posted by El hidalgo
I found it especially interesting that the AI now will have reasons for going to war.

Me too.

By the way, I turned the translation into HTML, if anyone is interested in hosting or having it.

Just send it to my email address (rasmus@sgic.fi).
I'll upload it on my ISP's server, so that everyone
can read the translation.

[El hidalgo]

Originally posted by Rasbelin
Just send it to my email address (rasmus@sgic.fi).
I'll upload it on my ISP's server, so that everyone
can read the translation.

On its way!