Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How important is Monarchy?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • How important is Monarchy?

    If Monarchy is as important as it was in Civ2, will the Japanese and Aztecs have a significant advantage in their starting technologies? There are four prerequisites for Monarchy and they get one (Ceremonial Burial) and have a 50% chance at the other (Warrior Code).

    However, Republic also has only four prerequisites including Alphabet, which is the bonus technology for Commercial civilizations. I wonder if Republic will be a more viable early government choice than it was in Civ2, where the happiness and production penalties in the early game made it difficult to use...

  • #2
    I usually skipped over Monarchy on the way up, because of my style of play and the fact that Republic followed close after.

    I'm not really worried about it.

    Comment


    • #3
      I'm looking forward to playing Manarchy. Although it wasn't as efficient as Republic and Democracy, it was always a good feeling when I went from Despotism to Manarchy. I hope it's as good as it was in earlier games.
      Of the Holy Roman Empire, this was once said:
      "It is neither holy or roman, nor is it an empire."

      Comment


      • #4
        Monarchy always was the government I used up until either Democracy or Communism depending on how the game was going. I assume that for me those two civs will be a good pick. Thanks for the heads up!
        About 24,000 people die every day from hunger or hunger-related causes. With a simple click daily at the Hunger Site you can provide food for those who need it.

        Comment


        • #5
          I dont no much about Civ-3 monarchy - but I do hope that one can play somewhat updated versions of monarchy (= industrial era monarchy) and despotism (= early 20th century totalitarianism).
          It would be nice if all five government-choices where viable & playable choices, also late in the game.

          Compare above with the transformation of the Civ-2 settler into engineer. The same unit, but enhanced. The same princip one could apply do Civ-3 ancient/medieval gov-choices like despotism & monarchy.

          Comment


          • #6
            Looks like both Republic and Monarchy will take as long to research, going by the Gamespot tech tree shots. If Civ 3 is anything like its predecessors, my guess is that Monarchy will be good for those with more agressive intentions and Republic for the more peaceful. But what will government be like until we get one or the other without fundementalism to rely on?

            David
            "War: A by-product of the arts of peace." Bierce

            Comment


            • #7
              To get Republic you'll have to research -

              Alphabet ( Commercial )
              Writing
              Philosophy
              Code of Laws
              The Republic

              To get Monarchy you'll need
              Ceremonial Burial ( Religious )
              Warrior Code ( 50% chance, Militaristic )
              Mysticism
              Polytheism
              Monarchy

              So it just depends on what techs you want. The Republic route takes you through a lot of techs that give nothing ( Writing, Alphabet ) so it may be advisable to go for Monarchy first.

              Edit - Mind you you'll want Writing in order to make treaties with other civs so........
              A witty quote proves nothing. - Voltaire

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: How important is Monarchy?

                Originally posted by ChrisShaffer

                I wonder if Republic will be a more viable early government choice than it was in Civ2, where the happiness and production penalties in the early game made it difficult to use...
                That's at least what I hope. I have never (it's true)
                succeeded with my early republics in Civ II.
                I have headed for democracy or communism,
                so the republic stage has often never ocured.
                Hopefully it's more working, because I don't
                want to have that 3 squares rule in Civ III.

                Anyway, if I use my peasant's logic,
                that rule hasn't got anything to do with
                republic, and certainly not with the Republicans.
                "Kids, don't listen to uncle Solver unless you want your parents to spank you." - Solver

                Comment


                • #9
                  ChrisShaffer, think of it as a challenge.
                  Alot of this discussion also played out on the "Governments" thread. It looks like Firaxis intends to do something like the following:

                  Default Gov: Despotism (Anarchy COULD be seen as a particularly decentralized form of despotism...)

                  Warmonger Govs: Monarchy, later replaced by Communism
                  Peacenik Govs: Republic, later replaced by Democracy

                  My own feelings on this are that govs should be divided a little differently, but then again, I liked SE from SMAC so what do I know. I might do something like this:

                  Default Gov: Despotism
                  Warmonger: Monarchy, Fascism
                  Trade Monger: Republic, Corporate Republic (think straight-up libertarian nightmare here)
                  Production Monger: Feudalism, Communism

                  Maybe a science monger or "utopian" strain should appear late in the game

                  utopian - Democracy, Technocracy

                  the conflict here being one between the masses know best versus the experts (scientists, bureaucrats, social engineers) know best.

                  And you know what? With that swell editor, all of this could happen.
                  - "A picture may be worth a thousand words, but it still ain't a part number." - Ron Reynolds
                  - I went to Zanarkand, and all I got was this lousy aeon!
                  - "... over 10 members raised complaints about you... and jerk was one of the nicer things they called you" - Ming

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I've always preferred Monarchy because under Republic, each unit cost one shield to support AND settlers want two food. That's a pretty big chunk out of your city production at the beginning of the game, and would basically in some cases halve or even bring to a standstill your city population growth.

                    Monarch -> Communism -> Republic -> Democracy... or I might switch to Republic after Monarchy if the there's a massive budget deficit.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I hope that Monarchy would be balanced with Republic,
                      better than in Civ2, there the only use good use for it was in war.
                      In peace Republic ROCKED.

                      Does anybody remeber Despotism from civ1,
                      it was well balanced compared to other governments:
                      -it was only govenment with a martial law, and it was unlimited
                      -it was only govenment with "free shields"

                      While you would ICSing in civ1 you won't go into Monarchy until you have enough cities (since only Desporism had "free shields").

                      Since in civ2 martial law & "some" free shield where given to monarchy
                      despotism became USELESS.

                      Of course I know some old CIV1 veterans which used only DESPOTISM
                      in civ1 & it wasn't bad strategy for militaristic civ after all.

                      In civ1 playing Democracy was much more harder, because there was
                      no such thing as Police Station or Shakespeare Theather.
                      As I remember I never used Democracy in civ1, only Republic.

                      I don't like things like "government upgrading".
                      In civ2 you would use:
                      1) --> Communism --> Fundamentalism
                      Despotism --> Monarchy 2) --> Republic --> Democracy

                      There was no reson to use old governments.
                      Still old government types are usefull in real world so they should be more balanced.

                      DESPOTISAM is nothing else than modern DICTATORSHIP.

                      MONARCHY is a little SOFTER,

                      REPUBLIC is even more "softer",

                      DEMOCRACY is a "very soft" govenment type,

                      and COMMUNISM is combination of DESPOTISM, MONARCHY & IMPROVED ECONOMIC model (maybe extra production?)


                      P.S. So I think that desptism in Civ3 would need some improvnig.
                      I also hope that since Sid Meyer works on the game (author of civ1)
                      and not B. Reynolds (author of civ2), that these inbalances with
                      government types would have been fixed.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: How important is Monarchy?

                        Originally posted by ChrisShaffer
                        If Monarchy is as important as it was in Civ2, will the Japanese and Aztecs have a significant advantage in their starting technologies? There are four prerequisites for Monarchy and they get one (Ceremonial Burial) and have a 50% chance at the other (Warrior Code).
                        According to Dan as he states at Civ3.com, The Aztecs start out with Warrior Code. I assume this means the Japanese get The Wheel.

                        See here

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Re: How important is Monarchy?

                          Originally posted by Pembleton


                          According to Dan as he states at Civ3.com, The Aztecs start out with Warrior Code. I assume this means the Japanese get The Wheel.

                          See here
                          Does the wheel still give chariots? Alot of good that'll do the Japanese on their little island. What they need is what ever leads to the samurai, if that is their CSU. Well who knows after the Iroquois?

                          David
                          "War: A by-product of the arts of peace." Bierce

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            That's at least what I hope. I have never (it's true)
                            succeeded with my early republics in Civ II.
                            In MP i usually went directly to Republic without going to firt to Monarchy especially in deyty level games.

                            Establish around 8 cities, build temples, irrigate a few tiles, make sure all cities above size 3 and then Republic and 100% luxuries, WLTPD, grow, make a few more cities and go directly to Michelangelo Chappel making sure caracvabns are ready when it comes. Try to get also John Bach's and then the world is mine.

                            I do not want to achieve immortality threw my work. I want to achieve it threw not dying - Woody Allen

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Bakunine


                              In MP i usually went directly to Republic without going to firt to Monarchy especially in deyty level games.

                              Establish around 8 cities, build temples, irrigate a few tiles, make sure all cities above size 3 and then Republic and 100% luxuries, WLTPD, grow, make a few more cities and go directly to Michelangelo Chappel making sure caracvabns are ready when it comes. Try to get also John Bach's and then the world is mine.

                              Urg! I hope Firaxis disabled the dreaded President's Day Sale!
                              - "A picture may be worth a thousand words, but it still ain't a part number." - Ron Reynolds
                              - I went to Zanarkand, and all I got was this lousy aeon!
                              - "... over 10 members raised complaints about you... and jerk was one of the nicer things they called you" - Ming

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X