Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ok, lets say I'm playing Civ 3 and its modern era...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ok, lets say I'm playing Civ 3 and its modern era...

    So I and my neighbour civ is in peace. But I'm loosing him by culture level. So what happens? My border gets shorter?

  • #2
    Very good question.

    If you were not at peace, then I would say definately. But being allies- I just don't know for sure (of course anyhow . But actually, I could still see your border shrinking because of his culture.

    We shall see..

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Ok, lets say I'm playing Civ 3 and its modern era...

      Originally posted by RedWhiteArcher
      So I and my neighbour civ is in peace. But I'm loosing him by culture level. So what happens? My border gets shorter?
      Yes, I think it will get shorter, peace or no peace. You may even loose a city. The people in that city just want to belong to that other civ!

      But we will see how this works out in civ3.
      Member of Official Apolyton Realistic Civers Club.
      If you can't solve it, it's not a problem--it's reality
      "All is well your excellency, and that pleases me mightily"

      Comment


      • #4
        Yes, I think it will get shorter, peace or no peace. You may even loose a city. The people in that city just want to belong to that other civ!
        Ok, well anyone cares to show such occasions in real life? Cities from one coutry joining another or borders moving. I mean there are border disputes on centimeters but none of them because of culture but because of acts of war.

        Comment


        • #5
          It's maybe even more interesting to imganine what happens when you AND your neigbours's culture still is growing, while your borders already clash. What happens? Will to lowest growth be rewarded with a decrease in borderwith in spite of the culturegrowth?

          Nah... Guess THEY (the mighty F word) have seen it all...
          -------------------------------><------------------------------
          History should be known for learning from the past...
          Nah... it only shows stupidity of mankind.
          -------------------------------><------------------------------

          Comment


          • #6
            Probably not, if not one of the civ's has much higher culture points. I can just imagine how crazy I'm going to be if another civ steels my cities

            Comment


            • #7
              yes, the situation calls for some surgical strikes at the cultural workshop camps on their territory

              Comment


              • #8
                Official borders and 'spheres of influence' are two seperate things. For example, the crusades didnt involve just one country, they gathered a huge force from different countries through the (powerful) cultural influence of religion. Not the perfect example, granted, but its something along those lines.
                I'm building a wagon! On some other part of the internets, obviously (but not that other site).

                Comment


                • #9
                  Official borders and 'spheres of influence' are two seperate things. For example, the crusades didnt involve just one country, they gathered a huge force from different countries through the (powerful) cultural influence of religion. Not the perfect example, granted, but its something along those lines.
                  That what I always thought until I saw so many people say that its exactly the other way around.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X