'We Luv The Babe' Days

[The Andy-Man]

In my opinion, a WLTKD which, instead of increasing pop growth, decreasers trade etc is a hell of a lot more powerful. i mean, less corruption = more trade arrows (if they have a similar concept), which = even more luxuries = more WLTKD.

It would also help ouyt those govt.s that have a corruption problem which destroys their usfulness in a large civ (like monarchy/republic).

[tniem]

Wow, Andy, want to say all that again in language that someone can understand.

You say something is more powerful but you give nothing that it is more powerful than. And what I can't understand, are you proposing a "WLTBD" instead of or in addition to the "WLTKD"?

[The Andy-Man]

i knew i shouldnt have smoked that joint.

[Akron]

Nah... a pop boom is incredibly powerful. Its great that they replaced the WLTKD pop boom with just decreased corruption and stuff. We'll have to wait and see exactly how it works to judge whether it is actually useful, though.

The longevity wonder looks very powerful too! Hopefully, it will come late enough in the game so that it balances out.

[Dauphin]

Can someone explain what the proposition of this thread was. Does it have a point to make?

[SteveJH]

Originally posted by Big Crunch


Can someone explain what the proposition of this thread was. Does it have a point to make?

Yes it does. Don't do drugs!

[DarkCloud]

Actually this brings up a point... If you choose "Female" and pick the Americans as your civilization will the WLTKD be called WLTQueenDay? Since you will be forced to play as Abe Lincoln despite your own gender?

[Dauphin]

If you choose "Female"

Not going to be a problem for me.


If anyone picks the colour pink, the French, plays as Jeanne D'Arc, chooses female, AND gets we love the Queen day, well I sure hope that they are female.

[red_jon]

I don't understand this at all

[Col Bigspear]

Originally posted by red_jon
I don't understand this at all

Join the club

[dainbramaged13]

Originally posted by red_jon
I don't understand this at all

i see youre nearly king.. not trying to spam count or anything, ar we?

[red_jon]

Originally posted by dainbramaged13


i see youre nearly king.. not trying to spam count or anything, ar we?

Who would do such a thing?!

And you must be very astute, considering IT'S IN BIG LETTERS UNDER MY NAME

Besides, I'm petitioning this thread due to the sexist use of the word 'babe'

MIIING!

[The Andy-Man]

it seems like i zam now on cyber shrooms.

[PGM]

Re: 'We Luv The Babe' Days

Originally posted by The Andy-Man
In my opinion, a WLTKD which, instead of increasing pop growth, decreasers trade etc is a hell of a lot more powerful. i mean, less corruption = more trade arrows (if they have a similar concept), which = even more luxuries = more WLTKD.
It would also help ouyt those govt.s that have a corruption problem which destroys their usfulness in a large civ (like monarchy/republic).

Huh? What the ...? Jeez, what "gone gold" news can do to a guy...