Tweet
I don't think there should be.
-
-
Agree wholeheartedly!Originally posted by Pembleton
I don't think there should be.
I keep my thumbs crossed on a fixed (but player-editable) move-radius, regardless land-unit and without any move-attrition.
-
Seeing as they are canceling or limiting the RR movement within enemy borders, it would be logical to conclude that they are also cutting limited road movement."Remember, there's good stuff in American culture, too. It's just that by "good stuff" we mean "attacking the French," and Germany's been doing that for ages now, so, well, where does that leave us?" - ElokComment
-
I surely hope they limit the movements. A rifleman on a train outspeeds a stealth fighter? Nah...To be one with the Universe is to be very lonely - John Doe - DatalinksComment
-
The 'Stealh fighter' anomaly won't be present in Civ 3, as airstrikes are handled in a more realistic manner. And yes, I believe it's reasonable to assume a military unit can be hauled a pretty decent distance in a 1-5 year timespan. Together with the new controversial 'no RR movement in occupied territory' the RR model should hold up nicely.
/GulGnu
-Stabil som fan!Comment
-
idea
Why not 1/8th of a movement point? In other words, a super fast road! Or perhaps 1/6th.Comment
-
for some reason i dont think this would work well at all...Why not 1/8th of a movement point? In other words, a super fast road! Or perhaps 1/6th.Comment
-
agree wholeheartedlyI keep my thumbs crossed on a fixed (but player-editable) move-radius, regardless land-unit and without any move-attrition.
anyway, i do... the train system should work like the airplane operation range.. the unit can move to any square (b) within radius (x) connected to square (a)And God said "let there be light." And there was dark. And God said "Damn, I hate it when that happens." - AdmiralComment
Comment