Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

If Blizzard can do it why can't Firaxis?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • If Blizzard can do it why can't Firaxis?

    Here is a quote off of the battle.net website

    Warcraft III update - 07/23/2001
    Over the past few weeks, it has become apparent that Warcraft III: Reign of Chaos will not be complete for release by the end of 2001. Our development team is hard at work finalizing the product and we look forward to bringing you an outstanding, real-time strategy game in 2002.
    Our goal at Blizzard is to make the best games possible. This means that we will not release a game until it's ready. While we could release an inferior product to meet a specific date, we instead choose to polish our games until they meet the superior quality that we know Blizzard gamers and our development teams expect.

    We firmly believe that this additional development time will prove invaluable, ensuring that Warcraft III will expand upon the legendary gameplay experience previously found in the critically acclaimed Warcraft series.

    Announcements regarding further details and specifics of the Warcraft III beta test will be released in the near future. We encourage you to check our official website at www.blizzard.com for updates, and as always, we thank you for your continued support.

    Blizzard Entertainment
    It sounds like from the announcement that they could ship it and patch it later, and with Blizzard's reputation and the legions of rabid warcraft fans (myself included), still make a killing. However Blizzard refuses to do this. They are screwing the most important time of the year, the Christmas shopping season because they want WC3 to be the best warcraft ever.

    Now if Civ3 is ready to ship in time for Christmas, that's great, but if it could still use some more development time, then Sid himself should go to bat for firaxis and ask the suits for some more time and money. If civ3 is done right then any delay will be made up in the increased sales from an instant classic. Rushing a game out the door almost always hurts the long term prospects of that game. If the CtP2 team had gotten more development time and more support from activision then maybe it would have sold more than what something like 34,000 copies.

    Jeffrey Morris himself said that a completely bugless game is a myth, and I agree with him on that. However, a game free of any showstopping bugs is not a myth. I recently bought Emperor: Battle for Dune, and it was very polished. It didn't have any major bugs, and I have had it for over a month and still haven't experianced a crash with it. Did I mention that I had the absolute minimum specs to run the game? It actually runs fine on my system, sometimes in huge battles it experiances a slow down but for the most part it runs good on my system.

    Civ3 can be the best civ or for that matter the best TBS game ever, but for that to happen the team at firaxis is going to have to make some very tough choices. One of the biggest choices facing them is when are they going to release civ3? I'm sure they could probably have the game out in two weeks from now if they wanted to, but that it would just be buggy beta code.

    There is a huge difference between a great game and a good game, a good game might just have great game play, whereas a great game will have great game play and all of those small nuances and small touches that sets it apart.

    For a civ2 fanatic I'm sure that two things are going to happen. First thing is they are going to complain about how civ3 is good but doesn't measure up to the perfection of civ2. The second thing is that they are going to buy civ3 on the first day it comes out in stores (that is if they haven't already preordered it). But these people don't really count. All of us here are completely biased.

    There are probably four thousand people here at Apolyton who are regulars...out of these four thousand people we probably have more Civ, Civ2, SMAC, CtP, C:ToT, and CtP2 experiance than any other group of four thousand people you could assemble. We are a precious resource that firaxis should value, because we probably know everything there is to know about civ. However, we are so biased that I think Firaxis has written us off. We demand excellence but I am sure all of us (including Yin) will buy civ3 at some point or other. Hell most of us have already devoted hundred of hours to civ3 as it is.

    We have one demand here at Apolyton, and that is that Civ3 is the best civ experiance ever! We are already in firaxis's corner for the most part, because we are going to buy civ3, so firaxis doesn't have to satisfy every single little whim we beg, plead, and cry for. But trust us firaxis, the better you make civ3 the the more it will sell, and the better it is the longer it will last.

    Everything you improve will convince one more player to get the game. Everything you leave unfinished or buggy will convince one more player not to buy the game. Forget the holiday push, just work on civ3 till you agree it is the best civ experiance ever, and then release it...even if it means you have to wait till 2002. That is all we ask, and if you think about it, it really is good advice that will help you years down the road when civ3 is still selling. We have faith in civ3, please don't let your fans down because of pressure from accountants...if Blizzard can shug off the holiday season and wait till Warcraft 3 is ready then hopefully Firaxis can do the same with Civ3.

    I hope Civ3 is ready when the game plays excellently with all of the new concepts tightly intergrated into the game, and when it is free of any major bugs, and has the best civ AI yet (one that can win at least 1 out of 3 games against a good player on the hardest level). My worst fear is that Civ3 will be ready when the malls open the day after thanksgiving for the begining of the holiday season.

  • #2
    Re: If Blizzard can do it why can't Firaxis?

    Originally posted by korn469
    We have one demand here at Apolyton, and that is that Civ3 is the best civ experiance ever!...Forget the holiday push, just work on civ3 till you agree it is the best civ experiance ever, and then release it...even if it means you have to wait till 2002...I hope Civ3 is ready when the game plays excellently with all of the new concepts tightly intergrated into the game, and when it is free of any major bugs, and has the best civ AI yet (one that can win at least 1 out of 3 games against a good player on the hardest level). My worst fear is that Civ3 will be ready when the malls open the day after thanksgiving for the begining of the holiday season.
    Absolutely...most importent is the bolded part

    Comment


    • #3
      I agree wholeheartedly. Once a game series has reached critical mass (defined as the popularity point where the game will be a hit no matter how bad it is), the developers can wait until they are completely ready.

      Comment


      • #4
        Yknow what, Screw this, Screw waiting for it, Screw knowing all about it, Screw complaining about it, Screw encouraging them. I'm going, I don't want to read one damn article on the net about Civ3.

        If I walk into the stores one day, and I see it on the shelf, I'll buy it. It's as damn well simple as that.

        I followed Black and White damn closely. I became the tattoo designer, I talked to the crew many times. In the end, I screwed up the whole game for myself. I was waiting for something that I ruined myself. All the games that fell out of the air turned out to be my favourite games of all time. My uncle would come over with Monkey Island, boy I can still remember it. "Money Island? wow that sounds fun!" I played it, hooked for life, happiest little boy in the world. Now all I do is complain that the game makers did a crappy job, spent too long, yada yada. Screw it. Being here, doing this, I REALLY am a contradiction and probably a hypocrit too.

        If any of you want this game to be good, I suggest you follow me and do the same.

        Ciao all.

        ContradictioN

        Comment


        • #5
          Alternatively, you can be like me and never buy it and probably never play it...I guess I'm a hopeless science fiction/SMAC fanatic.

          Comment


          • #6
            ContradictioN

            i don't see how knowing about the game and being part of the Black and White community ruined it for you. I think alot of the game is in flux and that the gaming press does little to remind a player that all of the things they see in a preview might change by the time the game goes gold...but I personally like knowing where civ3 is at in it's development process...not because it's going to really make my life any better...it won't...it's just a fun little distraction for me it's a hobby

            And as they make civ3 better they make my hobby better...i'm going to buy civ3, i am also going to buy warcraft 3...so far this year i have bought a bunch of games and i will do the same next year too...so if civ3 sucks, it's not going to ruin my life

            but if civ3 is great it might slightly enhance some little part of my life...the civ series has let me come in contact with a great number of intelligent and often quite quirky people...

            so far i have been a thread administrator for the original list, i have oversaw the Essential Civ3 list with raingoon, and i have mad hundreds of posts about civ3...when civ3 ships i am going to try to organize a group of Apolyton bug hunters to make a civ3 bug list, and to make an Essential Civ3 Expansion list...i do this because i think it is fun...i like doing my part...Will Wright said that with the Sims he has found that 2% of the fans entertain 98% of them. I want to be in that 2%.

            Out of all of the information we have most of it is useless until we get our grimy little paws on civ3 and abuse it we won't know what works or what doesn't...but i personally am neither tired of getting civ3 news, nor completely frustrated at the lack of official firaxis updates

            All I know is that I have a huge amount of respect for Blizzard because they refuse to release anything less than an A quality title, Starcraft is still on the charts, and Diablo 2 is still a force (besides the Sims which is almost unexplicable in terms of success) outselling many new titles. All of this success has came at a price, Blizzard has always given up short term gain in favor of long term success, and I hope that firaxis follows in Blizzard's footsteps. I am a fan, and I just hope that the quality of the product overshadows the short term bottom line at Firaxis. That is all I can hope for...even if civ3 gets released in October I'm positive that it will be many times better than Civ2 and after a patch or so it will be a great game if not a classic. I just think though that the more time Firaxis spends on Civ3 the less initial frustration at bugs and glitches, and the more developed the gameplay is going to be. Maybe I'm crazy for thinking that...but either way I want civ3 to do well, and I think we're safe in saying that even if civ3 has many flaws it will still sell better than SMAC, which Firaxis said they considered to be a hit. So with such an eagerly awaited title Firaxis should have some leeway on the time they can spend working on Civ3 and hopefully they will spend as much time as possible.

            The better it is the more it will sell.

            p.s. I also hope this thread doesn't break down and became something like "If Blizzard can do it why can't Firaxis? Because they are (insert explitive here)!"
            That doesn't help anything...

            Comment


            • #7
              blizzard is, IMO, a better, more established entity than Firaxis is.

              blizzard has released major hits, and was never afraid to spend EXCESSIVE amounts of time on it.

              all their newest games, Starcraft, Diablo II, and now WC3, have been delayed (Starcraft for over a year).

              if firaxis gives me a good reason for a delay, i will accept it. mind you i will still curse and whine, but i will accept it.

              a BETA could help you know.
              "I've lived too long with pain. I won't know who I am without it. We have to leave this place, I am almost happy here."
              - Ender, from Ender's Game by Orson Scott Card

              Comment


              • #8
                Blizzard was incredibly wise to release betas of all their games after Warcraft II. It ensured that the game was balanced, appropriately difficult, and fun. However, they did this mainly because Warcraft II had so many issues.

                Civ2, on the other hand, is considered almost perfect. Firaxis knows what needs to be improved from feedback. How is a beta going to help? A community like this would literally tear it apart and argue about everything. Note: I really love this community and consider it (tearing apart) a good thing in most cases, but not here.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Korn: Great thread! The paradox here is that as a small company they seem to think working on two games will diversify their risks. If you ask me, it has boxed them in. Well, they missed their window for a Christmas release for SMAC. Of course, if they do that for Civ 3, I doubt they'll have the saavy to make it a solid news item that actually reflects well on them.

                  In the end, I screwed up the whole game for myself. I was waiting for something that I ruined myself. All the games that fell out of the air turned out to be my favourite games of all time.
                  I know what he means. You can get so wrapped up in a game before it ever comes that it has little or no hope of matching expectations. Anyway, he'll be back. He's a junky! (like me)
                  I've been on these boards for a long time and I still don't know what to think when it comes to you -- FrantzX, December 21, 2001

                  "Yin": Your friendly, neighborhood negative cosmic force.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Um... Firaxis HAS done it before

                    Witness Evidence A: SMAC... pushed back at least twice...
                    “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                    - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by death_head

                      Civ2, on the other hand, is considered almost perfect. Firaxis knows what needs to be improved from feedback. How is a beta going to help? A community like this would literally tear it apart and argue about everything. Note: I really love this community and consider it (tearing apart) a good thing in most cases, but not here.
                      Excellent point... In fact, I need to say that again: Excellent point. Although this is my favorite Civ site (I've lurked for years ) and there are many good ideas seen on this forum, we can get a bit... hmmm, "over-zealous" may be the right word. It seems among most of the excellent suggestions, very little concensus can be reached, which should be attrubuted to the excellence of the Civ series: there is a bit of something for everyone.

                      As far a pushing back the game's official release date, we should probably wait untill an offcial date is chosen first. Call me crazy .
                      "When you have to shoot, shoot, don't talk." -Tuco Benedicto Juan Ramirez
                      "I hate my hat, I hate my clubs, I hate my life" -Marcia
                      "I think it would be a good idea."
                      - Mahatma Ghandi, when asked what he thought of Western civilization

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Don't forget that Civ2 contained some serious bugs - Microprose had to issue patches to fix the unit stats and allow players to create their own tech's and units.
                        'Arguing with anonymous strangers on the internet is a sucker's game because they almost always turn out to be - or to be indistinguishable from - self-righteous sixteen year olds possessing infinite amounts of free time.'
                        - Neal Stephenson, Cryptonomicon

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Right on korn469. Exactly what I have thought all along.

                          The reason Blizzard has succeeded is they looked at the long picture. We have had success with WarCraft I and II. Now we are making Diablo. We could release it and patch or we can make it the best game ever. Likewise, StarCraft was originally an improvement in graphics over WarCraft, they went back and made it one of the most successful games of all time. They keep going back until it is as near perfect as they can make it.

                          Now, I will buy any Blizzard product because I know it will be the best game that could possibly made with that subject.

                          It is the same way with Maxis. They have delayed games. They have significantly changed entire engines for a game just to make it better. SimCity3000 was supposed to be fully 3D and allow you to walk your towns streets. They were not going to be able to pull it off in a fun way so they started again. And it of course selled very well.

                          Make a game great and it will sell.


                          As for you organizing the Apolyton Bug Hunters, best of luck. I hope I can contribute when the time comes.
                          About 24,000 people die every day from hunger or hunger-related causes. With a simple click daily at the Hunger Site you can provide food for those who need it.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            tniem

                            i think we all agree that a great game will sell and sell and sell, and that unfinished buggy game...even if it's a diamond in the rough will fail and fail and fail

                            firaxis has all the talent they need to make a great game, this isn't their first game and i think they have a solid team organized by now...

                            but need i remind any of you here that civ3 has already went through one lead designer (btw what's up with Brian and company?) however hopefully all of that is in the past, and things have been running smoothly over at hunt valley since then

                            one thing that blows my minds about blizzard is that they released a balance patch for starcraft THIS YEAR! not only did it rebalance the game it also added in two completely new features, the ability to fight on the same team as the AI, and the ability to record and replay the game. I mean maybe those things aren't the most complex items ever to add to a game, but how many other companies would take the time to patch a game that came out in the spring of 1998?

                            as for the apolyton bug hunters we owe it to ourselves and to firaxis...we have already *****ed about civ3 so much that i'm sure firaxis (especially Dan) could kick everyone of our butts

                            if only thirty people get involved, and it take two people to find and properly recreate one bug that is 15 bugs...15 things that won't be around to ruin our enjoyment of civ3...

                            all i'm asking is that if people could just donate like maybe one or two hours a week for just a month that could be possibly hundreds if not thousands of hours spent by the community to find and reproduce bugs...all of that time free to firaxis...by alot of people who know just as much about civ as any QA person they could hire

                            then at the end of each week we could send firaxis a list we have complied of all of the bugs, with save games and descriptions of the bugs...just a few minutes each day generating a save game to verify a bug, that is all it would take to make civ3 that much better...and there are enough of us here if we got involved so that the strain on any one person wouldn't be more than they could handle while at the same time we improve the game

                            hell markos and Dan could even award a special title to the person who finds and verifies the most bugs...they could become the official

                            The Apolyton Big Bug Hunter

                            how does that sound?

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Well, quality comes from excessive amounts of beta testing. Internet is a great tool do quickly find testers and collect a massive input on bugs and gameplay in shortest time possible.
                              Why Firaxis are not planning to do so is still anybody's guess. It might be that it's not beta yet, it might be that they do NOT want open beta. That is really a shame, IMHO there is no quality control like 1000 apolytoners feeding you with 500+ comments weekly on bugs and gameplay.
                              But then again, it is them who think they know the business better....come to think of it, they probably do.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X