no i dont agree..
with an example of america; america is a nation of english people (mainly) who whiped out the natives not natives who were colonized and eventually became great.
The nations that are in lower technologically are not so because they are on their continent but because of varying features including isolation, the enviroment they live in and others.
And if your refuring to europe as the technologically advanced continent its not.. china was way more technologically advanced than europe for many years and so were the mayans....
I think that different continents should have an advantage in certain fields at certain times.. so like maybe for 500 the americas (an example could be any area seperated by water) have an advantage in purely scientific fields while asia could have an advantage in militaristic sciences and europe in domestic sciences..
with an example of america; america is a nation of english people (mainly) who whiped out the natives not natives who were colonized and eventually became great.
The nations that are in lower technologically are not so because they are on their continent but because of varying features including isolation, the enviroment they live in and others.
And if your refuring to europe as the technologically advanced continent its not.. china was way more technologically advanced than europe for many years and so were the mayans....
I think that different continents should have an advantage in certain fields at certain times.. so like maybe for 500 the americas (an example could be any area seperated by water) have an advantage in purely scientific fields while asia could have an advantage in militaristic sciences and europe in domestic sciences..
Comment