A new UN

[altF18]

though of course, my version of a new UN would solve that problem and be more realistic in such situations.
even if you as the U.S built the wonder, you would still be subject to four votes from the other SC members for your request...

shrewd diplomacy on the normal front would be a plus to get your request passed by the International Watchdog

[Ramboost]

I agree that the UN should give another dimension to diplomacy. The most important benefit form the UN (as stated by most of the replies in this thread), should be the opportunity to conduct multilateral diplomacy.

I many of my Civ3 and PTW games, I have really missed the opportunity to put pressure on other countries. As an example: To demand a nation to stop the agression against another nation. And the possibility to do worldwide sanctions that are legally accepted by the UN.

And by the way: I think the term "Diplomatic Victory" sucks!!!! ;-) What have you actually won by being friendly to other nations at a certain point in time? We all know the AI too well. Two rounds later they could be stabbing you in the back.......;-)

[Panag]

hi ,

the un should have units , just footsoldiers that you cant kick out , .... the top five civs should give a small number of units they build to the un , ....

maybe the same logic as the barbarians could be used programming wise , ....

it should also be a playable civ , ....

have a nice day