OK - I have to ask. Wouldn't we better off with Monarchy over Republic?
I haven't seen the math - but the miltary unit allowance under Monarchy versus the 1 gold per turn maintenance cost under Republc has got to really favor Monarchy.
No matter how you cut it - this is going to be a war mongering game. I would rather go with Monarchy. I do in many of my SP games - just to avoid the war weariness associated with Republic. My understanding is that the ptw does not have the same war weariness impact - but the unit issue alone has got to be a clincher.
My sense is that this game may not last beyond the middle ages - and will involve constant wars and alliances. There are probably not going to be long periods of peace and building infrastructure, with minimal defensive armies for which the Republic is so well suited. Not going to happen.
I haven't seen the math - but the miltary unit allowance under Monarchy versus the 1 gold per turn maintenance cost under Republc has got to really favor Monarchy.
No matter how you cut it - this is going to be a war mongering game. I would rather go with Monarchy. I do in many of my SP games - just to avoid the war weariness associated with Republic. My understanding is that the ptw does not have the same war weariness impact - but the unit issue alone has got to be a clincher.
My sense is that this game may not last beyond the middle ages - and will involve constant wars and alliances. There are probably not going to be long periods of peace and building infrastructure, with minimal defensive armies for which the Republic is so well suited. Not going to happen.
Comment