I've been reading up on events that have taken place in my absense and here's what I gather which is important to thinking about this potential strategy:
- Lux is running warriors around in ND territory and has founded a city 1 tile outside of ND territory in order to provoke ND into declaring war on Lux.
- Lux has done this because our defensive alliance with Lux honor bounds us to declare war on ND if Lux is attacked by ND - thus guaranteeing that Lux will have our help if GoW and ND team up.
- Lux has also approached GoW about teaming up against ND. Given ND's impressive strength, this is not a bad move.
So...
Lux believes they are guaranteed that we are on their side in a Lux-ND conflict and are using this assumption to fuel their push to war and ignore our protesting.
Here's the idea...
THE STRATEGY
1. While we do not tell ND that we have an alliance with Lux Invicta, we do tell them that while we are honor bound by a non-aggression agreement not to help ND against Lux if ND attacks Lux, we are not bound by any agreement in helping ND if LUX ATTACKS FIRST. In so doing, we STRONGLY ENCOURAGE ND not to attack Lux, no matter how much Lux does to attempt to provoke ND into a fight. Tell them it would be preferable for them to force Lux into making the first strike, though it would be preferable to have no war at all.
2. We then sign a defensive alliance with ND which states that ND will come to our aid if we are attacked and we will come to ND's aid if they are attacked. Such an alliance, coupled with the defensive alliance with Lux on similar terms, would mean that Lux can't declare war on ND w/o us siding with ND and ND can't declare war on Lux w/o us siding with Lux. ALSO, it means that if either ND or Lux attacks us, the other is honor-bound to help defend us (which they likely will relish, since they want to pound the other one ANYWAYS). Furthermore, if GoW or another power attack us, BOTH Lux AND ND are honor-bound to attack GoW and help defend us. If GoW attacks either Lux or ND, we must attack GoW, but we'd probably do that anyways
I'm tempted to call this whole thing my Bismarkian dual-alliance strategy...
OPTIONAL:
3. We make the defensive alliance ND known to Lux and, if we can renegotiate that term of the Lux alliance, we make the Lux alliance known to ND. Both become aware that they cannot attack the other w/o Spanish forces siding with the defender.
4. We kindly suggest that GoW is a better target
Gloria Belli Delenda Est.
----------------------
This needs some more discussion... I would relish being able to nix Trip's plan for a Lux-ND war, however... such a war is clearly against our interests and I'd particularly relish being able to out-manuever Trip while he's taking us for granted (as he's doing right now).
Ultimately, I believe that ND is the most trustworthy of the three AND they act as our buffer to Lux and GoW (which is why I want to keep them around), but I want to keep all three of them weak and divided, but not QUITE at each others' throats...
Discussion, please...
- Lux is running warriors around in ND territory and has founded a city 1 tile outside of ND territory in order to provoke ND into declaring war on Lux.
- Lux has done this because our defensive alliance with Lux honor bounds us to declare war on ND if Lux is attacked by ND - thus guaranteeing that Lux will have our help if GoW and ND team up.
- Lux has also approached GoW about teaming up against ND. Given ND's impressive strength, this is not a bad move.
So...
Lux believes they are guaranteed that we are on their side in a Lux-ND conflict and are using this assumption to fuel their push to war and ignore our protesting.
Here's the idea...
THE STRATEGY
1. While we do not tell ND that we have an alliance with Lux Invicta, we do tell them that while we are honor bound by a non-aggression agreement not to help ND against Lux if ND attacks Lux, we are not bound by any agreement in helping ND if LUX ATTACKS FIRST. In so doing, we STRONGLY ENCOURAGE ND not to attack Lux, no matter how much Lux does to attempt to provoke ND into a fight. Tell them it would be preferable for them to force Lux into making the first strike, though it would be preferable to have no war at all.
2. We then sign a defensive alliance with ND which states that ND will come to our aid if we are attacked and we will come to ND's aid if they are attacked. Such an alliance, coupled with the defensive alliance with Lux on similar terms, would mean that Lux can't declare war on ND w/o us siding with ND and ND can't declare war on Lux w/o us siding with Lux. ALSO, it means that if either ND or Lux attacks us, the other is honor-bound to help defend us (which they likely will relish, since they want to pound the other one ANYWAYS). Furthermore, if GoW or another power attack us, BOTH Lux AND ND are honor-bound to attack GoW and help defend us. If GoW attacks either Lux or ND, we must attack GoW, but we'd probably do that anyways

I'm tempted to call this whole thing my Bismarkian dual-alliance strategy...
OPTIONAL:
3. We make the defensive alliance ND known to Lux and, if we can renegotiate that term of the Lux alliance, we make the Lux alliance known to ND. Both become aware that they cannot attack the other w/o Spanish forces siding with the defender.
4. We kindly suggest that GoW is a better target

Gloria Belli Delenda Est.
----------------------
This needs some more discussion... I would relish being able to nix Trip's plan for a Lux-ND war, however... such a war is clearly against our interests and I'd particularly relish being able to out-manuever Trip while he's taking us for granted (as he's doing right now).
Ultimately, I believe that ND is the most trustworthy of the three AND they act as our buffer to Lux and GoW (which is why I want to keep them around), but I want to keep all three of them weak and divided, but not QUITE at each others' throats...
Discussion, please...
Comment