The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
Mapmaking -- trade maps, make ships, build Great Lighthouse. Beat GoW, Legoland, GS.
Literature -- build libraries, build Great Library
Polytheism -- on the path to Monarchy. Beat Lux.
16
mapmaking
6.25%
1
polytheism
25.00%
4
literature
62.50%
10
other
6.25%
1
The poll is expired.
Greatest Moments in ISDG chat:"(12/02/2003) <notyoueither> the moon is blue. hell is cold. quote me, but i agree with ET. "
Member of the Mercenary Team in the Civ 4 Team Democracy Game.
Former Consul for the Apolyton C3C Intersite Tournament Team. Heir to the lost throne of Spain of the Roleplay Team in the PTW Democracy Multiplayer Team Game.
Knowing that we would have the exclusivity of Literature for a while has made me change my mind about researching Polytheism. It looks like we won't have competition for the Great Library for a while, and it is a nice shoot to try. We would get the Great Library plus all the other techs the other civs would research for us!
"Never trust a man who puts your profit before his own profit." - Grand Nagus Zek, Star Trek Deep Space Nine, episode 11
"A communist is someone who has read Marx and Lenin. An anticommunist is someone who has understood Marx and Lenin." - Ronald Reagan (1911-2004)
It needs to made clear that we only suspect we will have Literature to ourselves. Once we trade Writing and it gets around, each of the others will re-assess their technology directions, having more options at that point.
Also, if we do get the Great Library, there are downsides as well. We won't really be "pulling our weight" in the tech trading (formal tech alliance or not) and that will make us an object of scorn and jealousy. It could also make us a military target due to it's worth.
All that said, I am in favour of pursuing Literature and the Great Library.
Someone please remind me, does the Great Library include techs from nations we have no contact with or only with the civs that we currently know?
Also, has anyone given any thought to how the GL will affect other nations attitudes or ever paranoia towards us?
[edit]: It has proven thusfar that a lack of trading techs is counter-productive to a team's success and possibly moreso a disadvantage. Every team seems to have grasped the need to not be perceived as closed-off or exclusive. We also have none of the disadvantage we would have in relation to the higher-level AI that would make the GL truly advantageous to staying competitive.
Last edited by ruby_maser; January 31, 2003, 15:33.
"The dogmas of the quiet past are inadequate to the stormy present. The occasion is piled high with difficulty, and we must rise with the occasion. As our case is new, so we must think anew and act anew. We must disenthrall ourselves, and then we shall save our country." -- Abraham Lincoln
"Generations to come will scarce believe that such a one as this ever, in flesh and blood, walked upon this earth." -- Albert Einstein, in regards to Mohandis Gandhi
Agreed. If we get the library we must invest in a great army to protect us from all that jelous people. But we are suposed to get enough money to do that. Aren't we?
"Never trust a man who puts your profit before his own profit." - Grand Nagus Zek, Star Trek Deep Space Nine, episode 11
"A communist is someone who has read Marx and Lenin. An anticommunist is someone who has understood Marx and Lenin." - Ronald Reagan (1911-2004)
It only includes nations that we have contact with, and yes, it will annoy our neighbors, as their 3-way tech triangle will serve to gift us with a number of undeserved techs.
--Togas
Greatest Moments in ISDG chat:"(12/02/2003) <notyoueither> the moon is blue. hell is cold. quote me, but i agree with ET. "
Member of the Mercenary Team in the Civ 4 Team Democracy Game.
Former Consul for the Apolyton C3C Intersite Tournament Team. Heir to the lost throne of Spain of the Roleplay Team in the PTW Democracy Multiplayer Team Game.
I think Mapmaking would be better as then we might find Legoland. I think it is unwise to seem too standoffish, which having the Great Library would make us be.
And as for money, we can set our research to almost 0 and increase our funds.
Personally, I'm more for the Poly-Monarch route, as that will both boost our REX & reduce our corruption. In working on the spreadsheet for Dejon, I have found that his city will have 41% corruption/waste while not connected to the trade network & 35% when it is. With Monarchy, this will be reduced to 29% while it's not connected (it should be by that time) and 26% when it is. The only other thing that will help reduce these figures is the building of a courthouse (which will require Code of Laws).
As for a GW, I say that the Hanging Gardens would be the best to support our growth.
Letus Eta Tamali
Come and see me at WePlayCiv
Worship the Comic here! Term IV DFM for Trade, Term V CP & Term VI DM, Term VII SMC of Apolytonia - SPDGI, Minister of the Interior of the PTW InterSite Demo Game
Originally posted by E_T
In working on the spreadsheet for Dejon, I have found that his city will have 41% corruption/waste while not connected to the trade network & 35% when it is. With Monarchy, this will be reduced to 29% while it's not connected (it should be by that time) and 26% when it is. The only other thing that will help reduce these figures is the building of a courthouse (which will require Code of Laws).
I knew it would be high, but I wasn't prepared for that!
For some that are just joining this discussion, the discussion actually started in the Wise Men thread, with this post. A few posts down from there is my argument against Map Making. Also, having the Great Library doesn't mean we have to become isolationist - we can trade our "free" techs to others to reduce jealousy. It seems we will soon have contact with 5 out of the other 6 civs, so if 1 completes and tech and trades it to someone else - we will get it and then be able to trade it to the other 3.
Originally posted by dejon
I knew it would be high, but I wasn't prepared for that!
[ooc]
The Distance Factor is what's the biggest contributor to that figure. It will be reduced by 1/3 with Monarchy.
This will also have an effect with all of the other cities that are planned. Being on a Standard map, only gives a slight bonus to the commercial civs.
[ooc]
Eta Tamali
Come and see me at WePlayCiv
Worship the Comic here! Term IV DFM for Trade, Term V CP & Term VI DM, Term VII SMC of Apolytonia - SPDGI, Minister of the Interior of the PTW InterSite Demo Game
It doesn't really matter, in my opinion... we'll probably trade for whatever we don't have.
Long-time poster on Apolyton and WePlayCiv
Consul of Apolyton from the 1st Civ3 Inter-Site Democracy Game (ISDG)
7th President of Apolyton in the 1st Civ3 Democracy Game
We can sign an agreement with civs to share the techs we get from the Great Library...
Aidun
"Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement. For even the very wise can not see all ends." - J.R.R. Tolkien, The Fellowship of the Ring. Term 9 and 10 Domestic Minister of the C3DG I., Term 8 Regional Governor of Old Persia in the C3DGand proud citizen of Apolyton. Royal Ambassador to Legoland in the C3 PTW DG, Foreign Affairs Minister and King of the United Kingdom in the MZO C3CDG and leader of the Monarchist Imperialist team. Moody Sir Aidun (The Impatient) of the Holy Templar Order in the C4BtSDG
Comment