Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

So about the second cow in Pamplona...

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • #1

    So about the second cow in Pamplona...

    Irrigate or mine?

    Personally my opinion is irrigate. I think that Pamplona has enough other lands who can be irrigated and where it can get his production from, but I'd like to hear the opinion of the Spanish nobles about it, specially the opinion from Pamplona's Governor, señor Ruby_Maser.
    "Never trust a man who puts your profit before his own profit." - Grand Nagus Zek, Star Trek Deep Space Nine, episode 11
    "A communist is someone who has read Marx and Lenin. An anticommunist is someone who has understood Marx and Lenin." - Ronald Reagan (1911-2004)
    Tags: None
  • #2
    Are you planning on roading the first cow? Just asking

    Eta Tamali
    Come and see me at WePlayCiv
    Worship the Comic here!
    Term IV DFM for Trade, Term V CP & Term VI DM, Term VII SMC of Apolytonia - SPDGI, Minister of the Interior of the PTW InterSite Demo Game

    Comment

    • #3
      Yes, the first cow will be irrigated to get the extra commerce.
      "Never trust a man who puts your profit before his own profit." - Grand Nagus Zek, Star Trek Deep Space Nine, episode 11
      "A communist is someone who has read Marx and Lenin. An anticommunist is someone who has understood Marx and Lenin." - Ronald Reagan (1911-2004)

      Comment

      • #4
        I would like to mine the second cow, in order to give Pamplona a greater productivity. Otherwise (irrigating) I would see Pamplona to reach the 4 pop before producing the first settler.

        I would like have a fine analysis from Señor Ruby_Maser giving the time line of Pamplona productions/growth under the several cases (irrigating vs. mining)
        Hosting and playing the Civ4BtS APT
        Ex-Organizador y jugador de Civ4BtS Progressive Games

        Comment

        • #5
          Originally posted by astrologix
          I would like have a fine analysis from Señor Ruby_Maser giving the time line of Pamplona productions/growth under the several cases (irrigating vs. mining)
          It shall be done ...when I get home from work
          "The dogmas of the quiet past are inadequate to the stormy present. The occasion is piled high with difficulty, and we must rise with the occasion. As our case is new, so we must think anew and act anew. We must disenthrall ourselves, and then we shall save our country." -- Abraham Lincoln

          "Generations to come will scarce believe that such a one as this ever, in flesh and blood, walked upon this earth." -- Albert Einstein, in regards to Mohandis Gandhi

          Comment

          • #6
            From the Pamplona thread:

            Originally posted by ruby_maser
            Concerning the second cow, I am of the opinion it should be mined. Strong growth will not be an early problem for this city. With one cow producing 4 food, another producing 3, and a flood plain to the south with the potential for 3 when irrigated, I was able to push the city to size 5 and still have growth within 4 turns. I see growth a secondary issue to shield production. Corruption will take a bite out of this city's shields and maximizing that will be prove more difficult early on. Later, when our labor force has less priorities and mining mountains is not prohibitive, it could always be revised to produce more food.
            This looks like a valid reason for me. Since it is probable that Pamplona would expent several turns being size 2 and eventually come back after poping some settlers or workers, it is desirable to have an equilibrium between food and production while in size 2. So, go for that mining.
            "Never trust a man who puts your profit before his own profit." - Grand Nagus Zek, Star Trek Deep Space Nine, episode 11
            "A communist is someone who has read Marx and Lenin. An anticommunist is someone who has understood Marx and Lenin." - Ronald Reagan (1911-2004)

            Comment

            Previous template Next
            Working...
            X