Perhaps we should go ahead and establish someone to do our public (dis)information campaign.
I'm sure that members of the other teams would LOVE to hear about our internal squables and fights (the parts we can actually tell them about w/o compromising our interests). Showing how much internal fun we're having and publicizing this to the benefit of others COULD have the following benefitial results:
1. Create sympathetic responses by people on other teams toward our team.
2. Further get the idea in others' heads that we're spending much of our time concentrating on role-playing (rather than scheming grandiose evil plans to take them down )
3. Perhaps even suggest that we're divided and squabling (although most of it for fun) rather than possessing anything even approaching well-thought game goals and/or a cohesive game or diplomacy doctrine.
The more they think we're spending all this time in here doing stuff like what's in our "Tribal Leaders" thread may distract them from thinking that we're spending most of our time on stuff that's in the "The Other Teams: An Assessment" and "Strategy" threads
The question is how, exactly, do we go about sanitizing what's said and happens in our role-play threads for public consumption? I assume this will take place under the auspices of the Supreme Leader.
To begin with, I think it would be productive to publish something of a sanitized account of DAVOUT's character (Gisgal?) accusing people of stuff and all of us making accusations and junk... perhaps the debate over the "Senator" status of History Guy... whatever helps to create the impression we want created
I'm sure that members of the other teams would LOVE to hear about our internal squables and fights (the parts we can actually tell them about w/o compromising our interests). Showing how much internal fun we're having and publicizing this to the benefit of others COULD have the following benefitial results:
1. Create sympathetic responses by people on other teams toward our team.
2. Further get the idea in others' heads that we're spending much of our time concentrating on role-playing (rather than scheming grandiose evil plans to take them down )
3. Perhaps even suggest that we're divided and squabling (although most of it for fun) rather than possessing anything even approaching well-thought game goals and/or a cohesive game or diplomacy doctrine.
The more they think we're spending all this time in here doing stuff like what's in our "Tribal Leaders" thread may distract them from thinking that we're spending most of our time on stuff that's in the "The Other Teams: An Assessment" and "Strategy" threads
The question is how, exactly, do we go about sanitizing what's said and happens in our role-play threads for public consumption? I assume this will take place under the auspices of the Supreme Leader.
To begin with, I think it would be productive to publish something of a sanitized account of DAVOUT's character (Gisgal?) accusing people of stuff and all of us making accusations and junk... perhaps the debate over the "Senator" status of History Guy... whatever helps to create the impression we want created
Comment