Tweet
Okay, I am no political dollard, nor will I ignore the wisdom of the mob. Please vote either for or against my new proposal, which should, if given the necessary votes, become our strategic directive for the next 40 turns.
1) Invictus: Granary, Settler, Spearman, Spearman, Settler, Horsemen, Horsemen
- Settler 1 to position near cattle in North
- Settler 2 to position near iron
- Two options hear:
- Build city NNE of iron in military zone
- Build city adjacent to NDE city, on hill in corner of river and within expansion of iron
- Spearman 1 and 2 to defensive positions on edge of hills on our border with NDE
2) Regium Equorium: Spearman, Worker, Barracks, Horseman, Horsemen....
Diplomatically:
Admiral PJ must work with his ambassadors, most importantly the ambassadors to GoW and RP, to formalize technology and defense agreements. For now, it's best to formalize a mutual defense only agreement...later, when we're closer to war, start asking about military alliances.
Also, I would like Admiral PJ to put me in contact with the military advisors of GoW and RP, ask them to email me.
Militarily:
In accordance with my opening statement, I propose that we continue our Rexing strategy, if only to ensure that we have a bubble of sovereignty to our west, from the cattle in the north, curving down to the military zone with NDE. Also, we should balance this strategy with military defense as planned above. No improvements, beyond the Granary and the Barracks for now. Finally, we must build a shallow spearman wall on the hills in the military zone as a deterrence.
City placement:
Maximize shields and pack them in! We're going to need allot of industry, albeit via smaller cities packed close to the capital and in the military zone. Later, we can rearrange/remove the waist.
My concilliatory statement:
Fellow Luxians, if my redoric has offended any of you, then please accept my humble apology. I am a soldier who knows a dangerous situation when I see it. As such, I merely acted with such venom to ensure that I made everyone aware of the troubles I foresee for our proud people. I hope that this new post proves that I am willing to listen to and incorporate the thoughts and positions of others, especially those you have appointed to lead us in their ministries.
Show our leadership what you think of this plan, vote and comment.
~Your humble War Minister
1) Invictus: Granary, Settler, Spearman, Spearman, Settler, Horsemen, Horsemen
- Settler 1 to position near cattle in North
- Settler 2 to position near iron
- Two options hear:
- Build city NNE of iron in military zone
- Build city adjacent to NDE city, on hill in corner of river and within expansion of iron
- Spearman 1 and 2 to defensive positions on edge of hills on our border with NDE
2) Regium Equorium: Spearman, Worker, Barracks, Horseman, Horsemen....
Diplomatically:
Admiral PJ must work with his ambassadors, most importantly the ambassadors to GoW and RP, to formalize technology and defense agreements. For now, it's best to formalize a mutual defense only agreement...later, when we're closer to war, start asking about military alliances.
Also, I would like Admiral PJ to put me in contact with the military advisors of GoW and RP, ask them to email me.
Militarily:
In accordance with my opening statement, I propose that we continue our Rexing strategy, if only to ensure that we have a bubble of sovereignty to our west, from the cattle in the north, curving down to the military zone with NDE. Also, we should balance this strategy with military defense as planned above. No improvements, beyond the Granary and the Barracks for now. Finally, we must build a shallow spearman wall on the hills in the military zone as a deterrence.
City placement:
Maximize shields and pack them in! We're going to need allot of industry, albeit via smaller cities packed close to the capital and in the military zone. Later, we can rearrange/remove the waist.
My concilliatory statement:
Fellow Luxians, if my redoric has offended any of you, then please accept my humble apology. I am a soldier who knows a dangerous situation when I see it. As such, I merely acted with such venom to ensure that I made everyone aware of the troubles I foresee for our proud people. I hope that this new post proves that I am willing to listen to and incorporate the thoughts and positions of others, especially those you have appointed to lead us in their ministries.
Show our leadership what you think of this plan, vote and comment.
~Your humble War Minister
I meant that only Horsemen will be used for operations to drive into enemy territory, and less of a 'siege fight' like the one over their nearby city would be.
Comment