Tweet
Hope I didn't miss anything 
-
6Settler0.00%0Worker0.00%0Warrior83.33%5Spearman0.00%0Barracks0.00%0Temple16.67%1Pyramids0.00%0Abstain/ Bananarama0.00%0The poll is expired.
"I used to be a Scotialist, and spent a brief period as a Royalist, but now I'm PC"
-me, discussing my banking history. -
I say build a second warrior. We need units to explore until we find out where our neighbors are.Citizen of the Apolyton team in the ISDG
Currently known as Senor Rubris in the PTW DG team -
Yep. Another warrior to explore is good.Comment
-
Another warrior. Whether we use it for defense or exploration, I don't know.
IMHO, I'd like to amass warriors, preferably vet, before we hook up any iron we have, then mass-upgrade them to Swordsmen, a la Plan Gold...Comment
-
Problem is our focus isn't going to be slow, heavy troops, but fast attackers, i.e. Horsemen/Knights/and (of course) Siphais.Comment
-
Two issues/points with this arguement:
1) It will be a while until we get horseback riding
2) Upgrading to Swordsmen will be expensive, but perhaps a valid stop-gap measure until we get horseback riding."If you're not having fun, then you're losing the game."-Copyright Warrior Poet 11/18/2002 "No plan survives first contact with the enemy."-Tsun Tzu -Don't know when B.C.Comment
-
They can also be expesive support-wise.
We'll have to disband them though, as we phase in our mounted troops. Paying 30 gold per warrior isn't exactly the smartest thing to do... while I'm sure we can stockpile plenty of cash, each one of those 30 could be used to upgrade from Knight to Siphai instead.Comment
-
I put up a separate thread with an expansion plan. Building a warrior next fits perfectly.Greatest moments in cat:
__________________
"Miaooow..!"Comment
Comment