We are approaching the next of the three true eras in Civ3: The era of cities. We will no longer be operating size 6 towns, but rather size 12 cities, and we must find a way to keep these newly overcrowded citizens happy. Here are some scenarios:
#1 Temple, Market, 5 luxuries
Shield investment per city: 160 shields
This is a pretty quick way to keep pop 12 cities happy. Unfortunately, it is neither efficient nor likely; the 5th luxury "wastes" two of its three happy faces on citizens that don't need it, and we'd have to trade for 4 luxuries (and we would then be dependant on other civs - note the plural!). This would have been nice if we'd been even luckier and gotten more luxuries, but as it is, we have to go with something else
#2 Temple, Cath, Col, 2 luxuries
Shield investment per city: 340 shields
Another bad idea. While our cities will be solid so long as we keep 1 luxury being imported, the shield cost is way too high; and Colosseums are a waste anyway. The cost per city raises to 440 when you add in markets, and that's still without libraries.
#3 Temple, Cath, Market, 3 luxuries
Shield investment per city: 320 shields
Also a high shield cost, but keep in mind we'll want lots of markets anyway, so the true cost is realy 220 for the Temple and Cath. We'll be dependant on two luxuries, but IIRC, Estonia has two, so if Vox holds up to its talk of close alliance...
In short, this seems to me the best anti-wonder choice
#4 JS Bach's, Temple, Market, 4 luxuries
Shield investment per city: 160 shields
Not much better than the first alternative due to the need for 3 imported luxes, but a possibility if we miss Sistines and get Bach's.
#5 JS Bach's, Temple, Cathedral, Market, 2 luxuries
Shield investment per city: 320 shields
Basically #2/#3, but with Bach's taking the place of the Col/Luxury.
#6 Sistine's, Temple, Cath, 1 luxury
Shield investment per city: 220 shields
At first glance, this looks great. We don't have to import a single luxury. But remember one key thing: we want markets to increase our income, regardless of the luxury situation. So this is basically #3 again, just without foreign luxuries.
So: Two luxuries take the place of Sistine's. 1 Luxury takes the place of Bach's. I'm beginning to think neither wonder is as valuable as we thought, especially Bach's. Sistine's is still a worthy goal, but if Vox is truly serious about becoming our ally, Estonia's luxuries will tide us over till we get it, and we'll hopefully have some more luxuries of our own by the time Hospitals roll around (heck, the game might be over). And I'd rather spend the shields on Bach's elsewhere. Of course, all of this depends on Vox being able to trade us two luxuries.
Over the next 20 turns or so, we need to decide what happiness route to take; Legopolis will be close to wonder-ready by then. Personally, I say trust Vox and assume 3 luxuries; that will free up our cities, Legopolis especially, immensely. But we will be dependant on a foreign civ for the first time; if Vox betrays us before we have the Sistine's, or if we can't dissuade someone from building the Sistine's, we'll be in trouble. What's your opinion?
#1 Temple, Market, 5 luxuries
Shield investment per city: 160 shields
This is a pretty quick way to keep pop 12 cities happy. Unfortunately, it is neither efficient nor likely; the 5th luxury "wastes" two of its three happy faces on citizens that don't need it, and we'd have to trade for 4 luxuries (and we would then be dependant on other civs - note the plural!). This would have been nice if we'd been even luckier and gotten more luxuries, but as it is, we have to go with something else
#2 Temple, Cath, Col, 2 luxuries
Shield investment per city: 340 shields
Another bad idea. While our cities will be solid so long as we keep 1 luxury being imported, the shield cost is way too high; and Colosseums are a waste anyway. The cost per city raises to 440 when you add in markets, and that's still without libraries.
#3 Temple, Cath, Market, 3 luxuries
Shield investment per city: 320 shields
Also a high shield cost, but keep in mind we'll want lots of markets anyway, so the true cost is realy 220 for the Temple and Cath. We'll be dependant on two luxuries, but IIRC, Estonia has two, so if Vox holds up to its talk of close alliance...
In short, this seems to me the best anti-wonder choice
#4 JS Bach's, Temple, Market, 4 luxuries
Shield investment per city: 160 shields
Not much better than the first alternative due to the need for 3 imported luxes, but a possibility if we miss Sistines and get Bach's.
#5 JS Bach's, Temple, Cathedral, Market, 2 luxuries
Shield investment per city: 320 shields
Basically #2/#3, but with Bach's taking the place of the Col/Luxury.
#6 Sistine's, Temple, Cath, 1 luxury
Shield investment per city: 220 shields
At first glance, this looks great. We don't have to import a single luxury. But remember one key thing: we want markets to increase our income, regardless of the luxury situation. So this is basically #3 again, just without foreign luxuries.
So: Two luxuries take the place of Sistine's. 1 Luxury takes the place of Bach's. I'm beginning to think neither wonder is as valuable as we thought, especially Bach's. Sistine's is still a worthy goal, but if Vox is truly serious about becoming our ally, Estonia's luxuries will tide us over till we get it, and we'll hopefully have some more luxuries of our own by the time Hospitals roll around (heck, the game might be over). And I'd rather spend the shields on Bach's elsewhere. Of course, all of this depends on Vox being able to trade us two luxuries.
Over the next 20 turns or so, we need to decide what happiness route to take; Legopolis will be close to wonder-ready by then. Personally, I say trust Vox and assume 3 luxuries; that will free up our cities, Legopolis especially, immensely. But we will be dependant on a foreign civ for the first time; if Vox betrays us before we have the Sistine's, or if we can't dissuade someone from building the Sistine's, we'll be in trouble. What's your opinion?
Comment