Originally posted by Tiberius
Hmm, actually I'd be for building the camps earlier. All we need to build in these camps are barracks and immediately after that they could churn out units after units.
This way we could focus in the permanent new cities on infrastructure (temples, markets, libraries, cathedrals) without having to worry about the lack of a proper army.
Hmm, actually I'd be for building the camps earlier. All we need to build in these camps are barracks and immediately after that they could churn out units after units.
This way we could focus in the permanent new cities on infrastructure (temples, markets, libraries, cathedrals) without having to worry about the lack of a proper army.
Keep in mind that we can have the newly founded cities function as military camps for some time, too - with the added benefit of actually developing (even if only with barracks) permanent cities.
If we had improved tiles that would often/all the time be not worked by any permanent cities, then camps would be in order, IMHO. But I do not see any tiles like that, not enough for camps - plus, our cities are growing, so even those few tiles still not used permanently should soon be worked as well.
We would have to develop tiles for the camp cities. So, why not develop tiles for permanent cities, using them temporarily as camps?
Comment