Something that was brought up in the ND-GoW chat was that we could give Lux a city on the coast to build a settler with and a boat and they could then sail to Legoland and start over there.
Thus allowing Lux to survive AND giving Lego someone to compete with for land.
Other Possibilities
1) Lux gets a free tech at the start of the new age (Monotheism) which is needed for us to get to Chivalry and our UU.
2) We might be able to accomplish our war objectives will out losing units and stockpile them for the war with Roleplay.
With that in mind I mentioned it to Trip:
Do we want to go through with it? I can build a settler in Imperial City and send to the coast. Which site should we give them if we do this?
Either 1 or 5?
Thus allowing Lux to survive AND giving Lego someone to compete with for land.
Other Possibilities
1) Lux gets a free tech at the start of the new age (Monotheism) which is needed for us to get to Chivalry and our UU.
2) We might be able to accomplish our war objectives will out losing units and stockpile them for the war with Roleplay.
With that in mind I mentioned it to Trip:
Trip wrote on 19-02-2003 12:51:
Darekill said that his team probably wouldn't go for it. At this point, if they refuse, even temporarily (which is the most likely), and we are unable to get a settler out (which is also likely), then Lux will probably be taken out before things can be done. The best way to enact this plan would be to trade Felix to GoW for an interior GoW city on the coast. While GoW might not like this idea, it may be the only way to make the plan work, and GoW seems to recognize the importance of curtailing Lego. This city would be used to build an expedition to the other continent, then could be captured by GoW after it's above size 2, so the city would be returned to GoW control after Lux was finished using it to depart from this continent. What do you think?
GhengisFarb wrote on February 19th, 2003 09:00 am:
Even if ND doesn't agree to it, if you gave us former Camp Felix, we would let your settler go to the other side of our capital to build the coastal city. Based on the border agreement ND gave us it would be well behind our lines and they would have to go through a thick layer of our cities to get there.
I don't think they would have a problem with this they are primarily interested in taking all of your land.
Even if ND doesn't agree to it, if you gave us former Camp Felix, we would let your settler go to the other side of our capital to build the coastal city. Based on the border agreement ND gave us it would be well behind our lines and they would have to go through a thick layer of our cities to get there.
I don't think they would have a problem with this they are primarily interested in taking all of your land.
Either 1 or 5?
Comment