Tweet
Darekill sent me this:
I then told him that I liked the idea, he responded:
Personally, I think it's a great idea, it's the most egalitarian way of ending this whole joint victory and I'll LOVE to see the face of the naysayers when they find out that Vox triggered the victory.
So, do we agree on this?
-MZ
I've just made a proposal in the ND community.
GS want's this game to be ended by achieving an ingame Victorytrigger. Right?
We both know that our alliance has already won the game no matter what the world may think Right?
My idea is to give what GS wants in a way they least expect us to do.
They still think they can divert us when it comes down to the discussion who should win teh election ingame.
What if we donate a majority of citys in the llast turns to Vox controli so that we ensure they are a candidate for the UN-Vote and then elect them to the "official" winners of the game.
I think that would be the right slap into the face of GS.
Everyone would know that this was only possible out of our both mercy and that we could have won if we wanted but letting them win shows that we do not give a damn about their Propaganda.
Do you care to consider this an option?
GS want's this game to be ended by achieving an ingame Victorytrigger. Right?
We both know that our alliance has already won the game no matter what the world may think Right?
My idea is to give what GS wants in a way they least expect us to do.
They still think they can divert us when it comes down to the discussion who should win teh election ingame.
What if we donate a majority of citys in the llast turns to Vox controli so that we ensure they are a candidate for the UN-Vote and then elect them to the "official" winners of the game.
I think that would be the right slap into the face of GS.
Everyone would know that this was only possible out of our both mercy and that we could have won if we wanted but letting them win shows that we do not give a damn about their Propaganda.
Do you care to consider this an option?
My gouvernmentr that does not know that it is "my" gouvernment agrees to the idea too.
So we should do it it's the most funny way to react to the latest posts which have realy upset me a bit. It is bad looserism no more and no less.
I was willen at any time to admit defeat if it would have come. Anyway anyhow if they would have managed to beat our team we would have congratulatet them.
Done this lately in our GWS DEmogame where our Barbaren were defeated ba an ingame alliance from the russians and the chinese we fought we lost we admited defeat. Thats the spirit.
Tell you whats cheesy... they are. Sorry but i had to get that off of my chest.
Phew...
so now i'm better.
geetings
Darekill
So we should do it it's the most funny way to react to the latest posts which have realy upset me a bit. It is bad looserism no more and no less.
I was willen at any time to admit defeat if it would have come. Anyway anyhow if they would have managed to beat our team we would have congratulatet them.
Done this lately in our GWS DEmogame where our Barbaren were defeated ba an ingame alliance from the russians and the chinese we fought we lost we admited defeat. Thats the spirit.
Tell you whats cheesy... they are. Sorry but i had to get that off of my chest.
Phew...
so now i'm better.
geetings
Darekill
Personally, I think it's a great idea, it's the most egalitarian way of ending this whole joint victory and I'll LOVE to see the face of the naysayers when they find out that Vox triggered the victory.
So, do we agree on this?
-MZ
Comment