Gathering Storm Trade Discussion

[Hot_Enamel]

[UnOrthOdOx]

MZ,

Can you post the chat we had with NYE Sat?

If not, I can post what I was present for later.

Based on said chat, a discussion with MZ, and new *cough* information *cough*, I think the above statement is quite harsh. I will send a polite 'no' to the proposed trade and attempt for a chat time.

However, during Thai Chi class this morning, my mind could not help but to think over this situation.

1. We can forget the NAP. Period.
2. I honestly don't believe they will attack reguardless.
3. On the No-Trade. What about simply NOT selling it to them for 15 turns? They have admitted they don't NEED it. I propose that I respond saying we would like to put the deal on hold for 15 turns, by then we should see if we will need their proposal (the Iron (yes WE know we wont need it, but this is for them)) and if it turns out we dont, we trade for the 200 cash.

Hm?

[Panzer32]

3. On the No-Trade. What about simply NOT selling it to them for 15 turns? They have admitted they don't NEED it. I propose that I respond saying we would like to put the deal on hold for 15 turns, by then we should see if we will need their proposal (the Iron (yes WE know we wont need it, but this is for them)) and if it turns out we dont, we trade for the 200 cash.

Sure

[GhengisFarbâ„¢]

Sounds good, but we MUST be negotiating with Roleplay to sell Chivalry. We are negotiating with everyone else and we need them to think we are plotting the mutual destruction of ND to keep them off balance.

[UnOrthOdOx]

I agree. MZ, do you need an ambassador to RP?

I suppose I can smile and play nice for a few turns...