Common Unit Naming

[Panzer32]

I think we should have a specific system of naming so that we can quickly identify the type of unit that it is without having to look at the stats. It also makes turn reporting alot easier. Here is my suggestion:

Each different unit has its own seperate numbering.

Horsemen/Riders: #st/nd/rd/th Sir ****
Warriors/Midievel infantry: #st/nd/rd/th **** Infantry
Spearmen/Pikemen: #st/nd/rd/th **** Guard
Galley: #st/nd/rd/th Good Ship ****

When we research a new unit, we make up a new naming convention for it, or continue one from the old via upgrades. The asterics are what the King producing the unit names it. The King can also specify the number assigned to it (doesn't have to be in order).

Please comment

[Master Zen]

Yes, we should homogenize the naming, however, I think horsemen and riders don't need to be numbered, just give them names like Sir Skull****er stuff like that.

[Hot_Enamel]

Sounds Like a good plan

[Panzer32]

I would like to have the numbers. It makes it slightly easier to remember (I'm a number guy myself). For those who think that numbering would give away the amount of our forces to an enemy, I didn't say that we had to number them in order.

[Master Zen]

"145th Riders - Sir Buttkicker"

you think RP would buy the 145th part?

[Panzer32]

They wouldn't buy it, but we wouldn't give them any additional information.