Tweet
I know I mentioned the 'true non-agression' pact earlier in the thread, but the more I think about it, the worse it sounds. I think it will make us come off as trying to manipulate the teams on Bob to do 'our' bidding. That certainly won't help our image.
If we decline any NAP's and just mention we are worried about the message it sends to the teams that aren't involved, that should be enough. Not proposing that it be voidable by any agressive warfare. If the other team does propose it, we could then get on board.
If we decline any NAP's and just mention we are worried about the message it sends to the teams that aren't involved, that should be enough. Not proposing that it be voidable by any agressive warfare. If the other team does propose it, we could then get on board.
Comment