The court has been plagued with cases as of late. I have been mulling over the idea of an amendment that could help the system a little.
In short I am thinking about an amendment to the "Court" section that requires the plantiff of any case to be wronged before bringing a case to court... You know.. in the case of the veto, the senate was wronged so the senate must (as a body) vote to take it to court. Aggie, as the author of the bill had a real case here. In the instance of the MPPS, only the Senate (as a voting body) or Arnelos (The FAM at the time) were wronged, only they had the right to seek justice.
There would have to be some sort of clause modifying the impreachment process where the request for impeachment must go through the senate first before the court hears the case.
In short I think that this can be done without revoking any rights, It just relieves some court burden with the use of some guidelines.
Any suggestions regarding wording are welcome.
Vote and discuss
Thanks
Mss
In short I am thinking about an amendment to the "Court" section that requires the plantiff of any case to be wronged before bringing a case to court... You know.. in the case of the veto, the senate was wronged so the senate must (as a body) vote to take it to court. Aggie, as the author of the bill had a real case here. In the instance of the MPPS, only the Senate (as a voting body) or Arnelos (The FAM at the time) were wronged, only they had the right to seek justice.
There would have to be some sort of clause modifying the impreachment process where the request for impeachment must go through the senate first before the court hears the case.
In short I think that this can be done without revoking any rights, It just relieves some court burden with the use of some guidelines.
Any suggestions regarding wording are welcome.
Vote and discuss
Thanks
Mss
Comment