Pre-bill: 'National Gold Reserve'

[Panag]

hi ,

1000 should be the absolute minimum , however it might be wise to set the goal for at least 2500 and more in the future , we shall need some money in case of an emergency and for the intel agency , .....

and this should go in the COL

have a nice day

[Panzer32]

Another bad unnecessarily restrictive bill. You better plan on over 2/3rds vote for it is hard to imagine an executive that would not VETO this.

Tell it like it is, Roadcage!!!

and this should go in the COL

No it shouldn't. Period.

Hypothetical question: What if we had say 1296 gold. There is a factory in somewhere that would cost 300 gold to rush, that many people want rushed. Now, does the president declare an emergency? Or does he break the law by reducing our income by 1 (or maybe 0) that turn? How about if he wanted to rush a bank that would end up netting us more gold than if we didn't rush it and got the max 50gpt?

I believe this bill is way too restrictive. The president has a choice in these cases to either declare an emergency (which is stupid because its not), or not do these beneficial rushes.

Do not post this bill!!!

BTW, is anyone else annoyed at the number of either useless or conflicting senate bills?

[roadcage]

BTW, is anyone else annoyed at the number of either useless or conflicting senate bills?

not that it is happening, but that it is happening in public.

Even more disturbing, is we have many folks out there who instead of trying to identify what we want to happen and then design a system to make it possible, insist on drafting catchy spur of the moment bills and amendments.

edit insert
para above is actually directed at another thread but my juices got flowing a wee bit too strong here
/edit

We have a saying " Making sausage is a lot like making legislation, neither should be watched"

Ssgt roadcage (retired)

[Jonny]

Originally posted by Panzer32
I believe this bill is way too restrictive. The president has a choice in these cases to either declare an emergency (which is stupid because its not), or not do these beneficial rushes.[/B]

Do not post this bill!!!

I agree. This bill is too restrictive.

This bill =

[Kuciwalker]

[rant]Panag, no, we should not. There is no advantage to having more than 1000 gold (in terms of interest). Please read a thread (and the manual) before spamming it.[/rant]

[Shiber]

I'm convinced. This bill is too restrictive, as well as needless, because we can count on the president being responsible enough not to waste too much potential income.

[Panag]

Originally posted by skywalker
[rant]Panag, no, we should not. There is no advantage to having more than 1000 gold (in terms of interest). Please read a thread (and the manual) before spamming it.[/rant]

hi ,

why dont you do that , .....

and maybe you can watch your language a bit before you post , .... there is no need to it , ...

have a nice day

[Panag]

hi ,

the reason we should have more then one thousand is very simple , one the one thousand we cant use because it would not get us the fifthy gold of intrest , so that leaves one thousand and five hundred for emergency rushes or spy missions , ..... we can only get better with this

we can also build it up gradually over a period of lets say ten turns or more , ....

have a nice day

[Kuciwalker]

*sigh*

[Meshelic]

Originally posted by panag
hi ,

the reason we should have more then one thousand is very simple , one the one thousand we cant use because it would not get us the fifthy gold of intrest , so that leaves one thousand and five hundred for emergency rushes or spy missions , ..... we can only get better with this

we can also build it up gradually over a period of lets say ten turns or more , ....

have a nice day

Concerning keeping a minimum of 1000 lytons in our treasury at all times, I figured (like probably most people here) that any money BEYOND that 1000 lytons is money free for spending on rush-builds, etc.

Skywalker wasn't trying to be insulting, panag, there's no reason to get defensive. I'll only say that your statement was an expansion on common-knowledge, and didn't really provide anyone any insight.

Think of it this way, if we keep 1000 lytons in our Treasury at ALL TIMES, and do not spend past it, then wouldn't it be right to assume that we have to built up our profits?

Saving up to 10000 lytons or what you suggested would NOT affect the Wall Street. Besides, WHO WOULDN'T want us to build up our spending money?

Your comments just state the obvious way to obviously.
And I mean no offense by that, but don't you see how some people can get a little aggravated when you constantly state the obvious?

Meshelic

[Kuciwalker]

have a nice day

[Kuciwalker]

:P

[WhiteBandit]

Signal Noise Ratio

Come on guys. The signal to noise ratio as of late has just been absolutely horrendous. We've had to wade through so much crap it's just absurd.

Originally posted by skywalker
[rant]Panag, no, we should not. There is no advantage to having more than 1000 gold (in terms of interest). Please read a thread (and the manual) before spamming it.[/rant]

Originally posted by skywalker
*sigh*

Originally posted by skywalker
have a nice day

Originally posted by skywalker
:P

Note: Skywalker, I'm not necessarily putting you down, but I don't think the pot should call the kettle black.

Let's move on guys. We've had enough bickering as of late.

[Meshelic]

Re: Signal Noise Ratio

Originally posted by WhiteBandit
Come on guys. The signal to noise ratio as of late has just been absolutely horrendous. We've had to wade through so much crap it's just absurd.

Note: Skywalker, I'm not necessarily putting you down, but I don't think the pot should call the kettle black.

Let's move on guys. We've had enough bickering as of late.

Here here! *Applause for WB*

[Panag]

Originally posted by Meshelic


Concerning keeping a minimum of 1000 lytons in our treasury at all times, I figured (like probably most people here) that any money BEYOND that 1000 lytons is money free for spending on rush-builds, etc.

Skywalker wasn't trying to be insulting, panag, there's no reason to get defensive. I'll only say that your statement was an expansion on common-knowledge, and didn't really provide anyone any insight.

Think of it this way, if we keep 1000 lytons in our Treasury at ALL TIMES, and do not spend past it, then wouldn't it be right to assume that we have to built up our profits?

Saving up to 10000 lytons or what you suggested would NOT affect the Wall Street. Besides, WHO WOULDN'T want us to build up our spending money?

Your comments just state the obvious way to obviously.
And I mean no offense by that, but don't you see how some people can get a little aggravated when you constantly state the obvious?

Meshelic

hi ,

why not keep 2500 , we get 50 GPT from the first 1000 , the remaining 1500 we keep on the side for case of national emergency , ..... everything above should be used for spy mission , buildings , etc , ....

is that so hard to understand , ......

have a nice day