Court Case: Executive Veto On Slave Bill Is Illegal

[Kuciwalker]

Aggie does have a point. I'll press the case on that charge, not my original one.

[Kloreep]

Originally posted by skywalker
Wait a second. Never mind.

Sorry all of you.

I did the math in my head, and forgot a ten (ducks head in shame )

And I even pointed it out to you, too.

Well, this case should be interesting. Yet more precedent to be set by the court.

[E_T]

Originally posted by Aggie
Spiffor, yes arnelos wasn't here, but 3 memebers who did veto the bill were present, thus I claim that the veto is invalid and never took place since it can only take place within 72 hours. I will not press this case but if somebody wants to I won't object, not specifically for this issue but to set precedent.
Aggie

5 hours because the President was away for 48 hours (there about) is no big thing to deal with. IF on the other hand, he had been present and available, then I would have a problem with it.

As I was the only NO vote in the Veto, I have no problem with this time difference. This should not be Illegal because of this.

E_T

[Kuciwalker]

It should, because whether or not Arnelos was there would not have affected the outcome, the vote COULD HAVE BEEN taken earlier without a different result.

The reason there is a 72-hour limit is because otherwise the Cabinet would veto bills RIGHT BEFORE a turnchat, negating the Senate's ability to override the veto with a 2/3 majority, as the bill could not pass in time.

[Panag]

Originally posted by skywalker
Wait a second. Never mind.

Sorry all of you.

I did the math in my head, and forgot a ten (ducks head in shame )

I drop the case.

hi ,

lets hope you dont change your mind

have a nice day

[aleion]

Originally posted by panag


hi ,

lets hope you dont change your mind

have a nice day

guess this thread is no declared asleep