Razing: Opinion Poll & Discussion

[Jonny]

I say no more razing unless it is absolutely neccesary, because it hurts our reputation too much. It also gives some other civ the chance to build a city in the same location.

[Panag]

Originally posted by Jonny
I say no more razing unless it is absolutely neccesary, because it hurts our reputation too much. It also gives some other civ the chance to build a city in the same location.

hi ,

not if we get there first , ......

but we shall need some settlers then , our settler stock happens to be a bit in the low numbers for right now , ....

have a nice day

[Kuciwalker]

WHY SHOULD WE CARE FOR OUR REPUTATION AMONGST THE INFIDELS! THEY HAVE NOT BEEN ENLIGHTENED TO THE GREAT BANANA! THEIR OPINIONS ARE WORTHLESS!

[lmtoops]

Even if we kept Hamburg, I think the end result would have been the same(but if we kept it would have taken a few years of corruption). I believe the main reason for objection is because 'it sounds bad in the Real World'. We are destroying peoples homes, their heritage, children!!!

Well hello!!! It's a game!! (sorry to break the news Role Players).

I think the arguments for disbanding are sound and correct.
1. There was nothing worth keeping in the city
2. We can quickly start a new city and build it up with happy workers. All the roads are still there, so this city will grow quickly.
3. In doing, we free up troops to fight the wars.

No brainer.

[Panag]

Originally posted by skywalker
WHY SHOULD WE CARE FOR OUR REPUTATION AMONGST THE INFIDELS! THEY HAVE NOT BEEN ENLIGHTENED TO THE GREAT BANANA! THEIR OPINIONS ARE WORTHLESS!

hi ,



care to explain what you mean

have a nice day