Originally posted by Hot_Enamel
Bureaucracy gone mad !!
I vote he be made president again. We need a strong leader who can make tough decisions when needed.
Stuff the rules and constitution…Lets play the game !!
Bureaucracy gone mad !!

I vote he be made president again. We need a strong leader who can make tough decisions when needed.
Stuff the rules and constitution…Lets play the game !!
I'm going to side with DAVOUT on this one rather than Hot_Enamel. This is a democracy game, meaning that the input of the populace is fundamentally important to the "playing of the game". The constitution exists to ensure that the cabinet doesn't get carried away with itself and forget to consult the broader populace in the democracy game.
While I agree that the limitation on the cabinet having the power to sign MPPs and military alliances has been frustrating as the Foreign Affairs Minister, I also understand why it's there - to ensure that I (or the President in my place) doesn't just play the game by themselves w/o consulting the broader populace on important issues.
As for Aggie, the Senate could vote here to ask Aggie to resign and the Senate can always pass a resolution officially censuring Aggie's action (a legal slap on the wrist), but the Senate does not have the power to pass out actual punishments (that power is reserved for the Court).
I already stated that I think this should NOT be taken to the Court for the purpose of punishing Aggie, so understandably I'm against the Senate illegally doing so in the Court's place

Although I'm not in favor of it, I can't do anything to stop any member of the Senate from starting a Court action on their own to do something to affect Aggie or the illegal orders made. No-one has started such a court case (

Afterall, there's little point in having rules if we don't follow them. That goes for both the cabinet and the Senate. Call that excessive bureaucracy if you want, but I agree with DAVOUT that it's the only thing that's keeping this a "democracy" game in anything but name only right about now.
Comment