Oh and I wouldn't take their southern cities, Id rather have them as a buffer between us and Rome, but I havent looked at a world map in a while so maybe that doesnt even make sense in the current situation.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Poll (Unofficial) War with France Goal - The THIRD attempt.
Collapse
X
-
Ghenghis and Skanky Burns both summed up my thoughts in the last two posts following each other.
The French may not be a huge problem for us militarily now, but they might later, and they are the weakest nation right now. It may be impossible to intimidate us then, but strategically it is better to have these french conquests; all of the them.
also, less risk of our cities falling to French control culturally, it's a long shot but it's a good point, nonethelessFormer Supreme Military Commander of the Democratic Apolyton States, Term 8
Former Chairman of Apolyton Labor Party
Comment
-
Go over to the official war poll with France thread...
E_T has offered a very compelling argument in favor of limited war with France rather than complete annexation because the change in Contagion's rank will increase its corruption&waste... thus significantly delaying the construction of our Forbidden Palace... (not to mention the myriad other adverse effects upon other cities in the Persian annexation).
While others such as myself had previously argued for limited war, E_T has now provided the quantitative analysis which demonstrates the superiority of a limited war for our interests.Long-time poster on Apolyton and WePlayCiv
Consul of Apolyton from the 1st Civ3 Inter-Site Democracy Game (ISDG)
7th President of Apolyton in the 1st Civ3 Democracy Game
Comment
-
Originally posted by Arnelos
Go over to the official war poll with France thread...
E_T has offered a very compelling argument in favor of limited war with France rather than complete annexation because the change in Contagion's rank will increase its corruption&waste... thus significantly delaying the construction of our Forbidden Palace... (not to mention the myriad other adverse effects upon other cities in the Persian annexation).
While others such as myself had previously argued for limited war, E_T has now provided the quantitative analysis which demonstrates the superiority of a limited war for our interests.
The important thing is to elimate France as a player thus ending their nationalities hositility towards us in out cities.
Need I remind you that we are also trying to flip some 6 cities into our empire so an argument to avoid taking 3 cities is very hollow as we are already trying to take another 6.
Comment
-
We could move those cities, but if we do so, then in the spirit of the new appolytonian enlightment movement, i say we must not starve those frenchies!
just rush workers to lower the pop, then disband the city, we have the cash for this.
if this can be agreed upon, then let us annex france. If not, we can still annex france- but no starvation please.Save the rainforests!
Join the us today and say NO to CIV'ers chopping jungles
Comment
-
It would be funny if we could give it to one of the lost civs. Just think of the corruption they'll suffer from.
EDIT: On second thought, here's an idea: we pick a French city that we don't want and invest in the culture of the surrounding cities. Then we give the city to a lost civ or an otherwise remote civ (the Aztecs or the English), wait for it to flip and then give it to another civ again. That way we can gift it over and over again and improve our relations."Close your eyes, for your eyes will only tell the truth,
And the truth isn't what you want to see,
Close your eyes, and let music set you free..."
- Phantom of the Opera
Comment
-
This poll seems pointless to me; if we start this war and France bribes someone and ultimately the conflict is widened, then we'll have to reconsider our position. If that doesn't happen, well then it doesn't make sense to half-step through it and leave them with a few weak cities that will ultimately be absorbed by someone else.Minister of the Economy: Term IV, V
Ministre d'Économie: Session IV, V
Just because I'm paranoid doesn't mean there aren't people following me!
Même si je suis paranoïde, ça n'exige pas qu'il n'y a pas de gens qui me suivent!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Reddawg
This poll seems pointless to me; if we start this war and France bribes someone and ultimately the conflict is widened, then we'll have to reconsider our position. If that doesn't happen, well then it doesn't make sense to half-step through it and leave them with a few weak cities that will ultimately be absorbed by someone else.
I simply believed that a large number of Apolytonians would have supported the elimination of France while others believed far more citizens abhored the idea.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Reddawg
This poll seems pointless to me; if we start this war and France bribes someone and ultimately the conflict is widened, then we'll have to reconsider our position. If that doesn't happen, well then it doesn't make sense to half-step through it and leave them with a few weak cities that will ultimately be absorbed by someone else.
They did once in the past and we learned our lesson from it. From now on we sell technology and/or maps to enemy civs just before the attack so that we empty their coffers prior to the war. So long as they are broke they cannot buy allies.
--TogasGreatest Moments in ISDG chat:"(12/02/2003) <notyoueither> the moon is blue. hell is cold. quote me, but i agree with ET."
Member of the Mercenary Team in the Civ 4 Team Democracy Game.
Former Consul for the Apolyton C3C Intersite Tournament Team.
Heir to the lost throne of Spain of the Roleplay Team in the PTW Democracy Multiplayer Team Game.
Comment
Comment