Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Poll (Unofficial) War with France Goal - The THIRD attempt.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Oh and I wouldn't take their southern cities, Id rather have them as a buffer between us and Rome, but I havent looked at a world map in a while so maybe that doesnt even make sense in the current situation.

    Comment


    • #17
      I've never said we had to keep all of the cities, I just want to take out France as a player so they won't be in our way anymore.

      Comment


      • #18
        It would be nice to prevent our French-Apolyton citizens from trying to rejoin their motherland. If they no longer have a motherland, problem solved.
        I'm building a wagon! On some other part of the internets, obviously (but not that other site).

        Comment


        • #19
          Ghenghis and Skanky Burns both summed up my thoughts in the last two posts following each other.

          The French may not be a huge problem for us militarily now, but they might later, and they are the weakest nation right now. It may be impossible to intimidate us then, but strategically it is better to have these french conquests; all of the them.

          also, less risk of our cities falling to French control culturally, it's a long shot but it's a good point, nonetheless
          Former Supreme Military Commander of the Democratic Apolyton States, Term 8
          Former Chairman of Apolyton Labor Party

          Comment


          • #20
            I agree with Meshelic, Shanky Burns, and Ghengis Farb.
            Proud Member of the ISDG Apolyton Team; Member #2 in the Apolyton Yact Club.
            King of Trafalgar and Lord of all Isolationia in the Civ III PTW Glory of War team.
            ---------
            May God Bless.

            Comment


            • #21
              Go over to the official war poll with France thread...

              E_T has offered a very compelling argument in favor of limited war with France rather than complete annexation because the change in Contagion's rank will increase its corruption&waste... thus significantly delaying the construction of our Forbidden Palace... (not to mention the myriad other adverse effects upon other cities in the Persian annexation).

              While others such as myself had previously argued for limited war, E_T has now provided the quantitative analysis which demonstrates the superiority of a limited war for our interests.
              Long-time poster on Apolyton and WePlayCiv
              Consul of Apolyton from the 1st Civ3 Inter-Site Democracy Game (ISDG)
              7th President of Apolyton in the 1st Civ3 Democracy Game

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Arnelos
                Go over to the official war poll with France thread...

                E_T has offered a very compelling argument in favor of limited war with France rather than complete annexation because the change in Contagion's rank will increase its corruption&waste... thus significantly delaying the construction of our Forbidden Palace... (not to mention the myriad other adverse effects upon other cities in the Persian annexation).

                While others such as myself had previously argued for limited war, E_T has now provided the quantitative analysis which demonstrates the superiority of a limited war for our interests.
                Once again we don't have to keep ll of the cities. We can spread them out so that they do not impact the corruption as much.

                The important thing is to elimate France as a player thus ending their nationalities hositility towards us in out cities.

                Need I remind you that we are also trying to flip some 6 cities into our empire so an argument to avoid taking 3 cities is very hollow as we are already trying to take another 6.

                Comment


                • #23
                  We could move those cities, but if we do so, then in the spirit of the new appolytonian enlightment movement, i say we must not starve those frenchies!

                  just rush workers to lower the pop, then disband the city, we have the cash for this.
                  if this can be agreed upon, then let us annex france. If not, we can still annex france- but no starvation please.
                  Save the rainforests!
                  Join the us today and say NO to CIV'ers chopping jungles

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    As I posted in another thread, the AI will happily accept cities as gifts, even though it won't trade for them. So, we could rid ourselves of select cities and improve relations with someone at the same time.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      It would be funny if we could give it to one of the lost civs. Just think of the corruption they'll suffer from.
                      EDIT: On second thought, here's an idea: we pick a French city that we don't want and invest in the culture of the surrounding cities. Then we give the city to a lost civ or an otherwise remote civ (the Aztecs or the English), wait for it to flip and then give it to another civ again. That way we can gift it over and over again and improve our relations.
                      "Close your eyes, for your eyes will only tell the truth,
                      And the truth isn't what you want to see,
                      Close your eyes, and let music set you free..."
                      - Phantom of the Opera

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Good idea. The Aztecs (or English or someone else) would probably be better, since we'll have to wait till we can sell the lost civ's contacts to gift it to one of them.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Here's an image of the proposed consolidation before it was voted into oblivion:

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            This poll seems pointless to me; if we start this war and France bribes someone and ultimately the conflict is widened, then we'll have to reconsider our position. If that doesn't happen, well then it doesn't make sense to half-step through it and leave them with a few weak cities that will ultimately be absorbed by someone else.
                            Minister of the Economy: Term IV, V
                            Ministre d'Économie: Session IV, V
                            Just because I'm paranoid doesn't mean there aren't people following me!
                            Même si je suis paranoïde, ça n'exige pas qu'il n'y a pas de gens qui me suivent!

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Reddawg
                              This poll seems pointless to me; if we start this war and France bribes someone and ultimately the conflict is widened, then we'll have to reconsider our position. If that doesn't happen, well then it doesn't make sense to half-step through it and leave them with a few weak cities that will ultimately be absorbed by someone else.
                              This poll was just to find out where most people stood. It is pointless in the fact that it will have no impact on the war in France, that has been written in stone and we will NOT take all of France. I stated in the first post that it was unofficial.

                              I simply believed that a large number of Apolytonians would have supported the elimination of France while others believed far more citizens abhored the idea.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Reddawg
                                This poll seems pointless to me; if we start this war and France bribes someone and ultimately the conflict is widened, then we'll have to reconsider our position. If that doesn't happen, well then it doesn't make sense to half-step through it and leave them with a few weak cities that will ultimately be absorbed by someone else.
                                I concur to a degree -- our end goal may indeed be determined by what events occur during the French "Golden Age Causing" War, however, I think people should put to rest the notion that France will bribe anyone into attacking us.

                                They did once in the past and we learned our lesson from it. From now on we sell technology and/or maps to enemy civs just before the attack so that we empty their coffers prior to the war. So long as they are broke they cannot buy allies.

                                --Togas
                                Greatest Moments in ISDG chat:"(12/02/2003) <notyoueither> the moon is blue. hell is cold. quote me, but i agree with ET. "
                                Member of the Mercenary Team in the Civ 4 Team Democracy Game.
                                Former Consul for the Apolyton C3C Intersite Tournament Team.
                                Heir to the lost throne of Spain of the Roleplay Team in the PTW Democracy Multiplayer Team Game.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X