Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Turn chat today.

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 4
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 4 template Next
  • #46
    Sounds like a great turnchat wish I could have been there oh well. Well the loses in pasargadae weren't totally unexpected, after all the were fortified and in a city g>6 so there defense was 3.5, still a steep price to pay, but oh well that is life, but at least we can upgrade some more knights and kick butt. I still would like permission to attack persopolis and think we can win with a force of 5 knights+ our sword and a catapult. After that they will break i think. The GL was AWESOME and more than makes up for the losses. Maybe we can hold off using him until we see if we can take the rest of the persian homeland. After persopolis it want be long.
    Aggie
    The 5th President, 2nd SMC and 8th VP in the Civ3 Demogame. Also proud member of the GOW team in the PTW game. Peace through superior firepower.

    Comment

    • #47
      Originally posted by MarkG
      you should NOT use the apolyton chat!
      no, you shouldnt!!
      Why not?

      Anyways, Great news! So do we do six turns next time of did all 5 turns get done?
      Come and see me at WePlayCiv
      Worship the Comic here!
      Term IV DFM for Trade, Term V CP & Term VI DM, Term VII SMC of Apolytonia - SPDGI, Minister of the Interior of the PTW InterSite Demo Game

      Comment

      • #48
        Damn. Rameses was the pinnacle of term 3 and now the new Admin gets one in the first turnchat?!?!?!

        I guess I should be happy.



        Now I have vented a little, great stuff! Sounds like everything but the chatroom itself went fine. IF all our turns are like THIS.......

        And listen to MarkG - that chat still isn't completely fixed. It may be great when all the bugs are workes out, but right now the 'Poly chat is a right pain in the proverbial.
        Consul.

        Back to the ROOTS of addiction. My first missed poll!

        Comment

        • #49
          Originally posted by DAVOUT
          Quite interesting sequelle after our discussion on GL !

          Syllogism :
          - A good General must have luck
          - Aggie has luck
          - Therefore Aggie is a good General

          Actually, your logic is wrong.
          A good General must have luck. Therefore, if one is a good general he has luck: Good General -> Luck.
          Aggie has luck, therefore if one is Aggie, he has luck: Aggie -> Luck.
          To conclude that Aggie is a good General (Aggie -> Good General) from the two previous statements is therefore wrong.

          A better Syllogism:
          - Lucky people often make good generals: Lucky -> Often good General.
          - Aggie is lucky: Aggie -> Lucky.
          - Conclusion thereof, Aggie is often a good General: Aggie -> Lucky -> Often good General.
          "Close your eyes, for your eyes will only tell the truth,
          And the truth isn't what you want to see,
          Close your eyes, and let music set you free..."
          - Phantom of the Opera

          Comment

          Previous 1 2 3 4 template Next
          Working...
          X