Tweet
1) which did you prefer, this last system, the one before, or the original system. The plan had been to continue with Frances system for a few turns but no one even attempted to build his buildings which were the main element of his plan.
The main reason the prices were different is under the old system and the last one, out product competes against itself and gets double counted in the supply line.
2) What should we do with the lands given up by members who no longer wish to be involved? Sheik, skywalker, Frances, and Kramerman and have stated that they no longer wish to be involved (others have merely turned over lands due to vacations or other temporary situations which I feel is legitimate and the system seems to work okay for that)?
Notyoueither suggested putting them back into the auction pool or putting them in stasis incase they return.
3) I would like to try the nest session with the subProduct and integrate a hybrid system of the D:S numbers from session 4 (way easier for me, session 5's system took six hours to compute) and the ability to sell at minimum/maximum prices from session 5. The goal (in my opinion) is to have a system where you can easily own land and simply sell you product and/or own buildings that convert to finished goods/sell at a bonus if you want more out of it.
List of current players and their lastest reponses:
1)adaMada
2)Captain
3)civman2000
4)Darkness' Edge
5)Duddha
6)Epistax
7)Franses
8)GhengisFarb..............1)Session 4's system, 2)Land goes back to auction, 3)Yes, play hybrid
9)jdd2007
10)Jonny
11)Kloreep
12)Kramerman
[b]13)Nimitz
14)notyoueither
15)Rendelnep
16)Shiek
17)skywalker
18)Spiffor
19)UnOrthOdOx
The main reason the prices were different is under the old system and the last one, out product competes against itself and gets double counted in the supply line.
2) What should we do with the lands given up by members who no longer wish to be involved? Sheik, skywalker, Frances, and Kramerman and have stated that they no longer wish to be involved (others have merely turned over lands due to vacations or other temporary situations which I feel is legitimate and the system seems to work okay for that)?
Notyoueither suggested putting them back into the auction pool or putting them in stasis incase they return.
3) I would like to try the nest session with the subProduct and integrate a hybrid system of the D:S numbers from session 4 (way easier for me, session 5's system took six hours to compute) and the ability to sell at minimum/maximum prices from session 5. The goal (in my opinion) is to have a system where you can easily own land and simply sell you product and/or own buildings that convert to finished goods/sell at a bonus if you want more out of it.
List of current players and their lastest reponses:
1)adaMada
2)Captain
3)civman2000
4)Darkness' Edge
5)Duddha
6)Epistax
7)Franses
8)GhengisFarb..............1)Session 4's system, 2)Land goes back to auction, 3)Yes, play hybrid
9)jdd2007
10)Jonny
11)Kloreep
12)Kramerman
[b]13)Nimitz
14)notyoueither
15)Rendelnep
16)Shiek
17)skywalker
18)Spiffor
19)UnOrthOdOx
Comment