Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

War Academy: SMC Generalized Plan: The Greeks

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • War Academy: SMC Generalized Plan: The Greeks

    The Greeks are the number one civ right now (510 BC).

    They are decently sized, have a fairly strong culture, and their Hoplites are a unit to be reckoned with.

    I have expressed disdain over fighting the Greeks for a while now. The hoplite is one of the UUs i just hate to fight, their 3 defense value is bad enough, but if there's a mountain, all of a sudden you're facing a defense of 6. A calvary unit wouldnt like those odd, much less an archer.

    Recently it's beomce evident that Greece will have to be dealt with sooner or later. They settled the Ivory coast, leaving a stretch of land between there and their main empire that will undoubtedly be taken by them (or the Americans, who wont be around mcuh longer).

    Their empire is growing stronger and stronger, and we cannot let the Hoplites deter us from toppling them from their throne as the #1 civ. Knights may prove useful quite soon.

    This is a thread for general strategies we could use against Greece. Nothing specific, as the map will change a bit between now and whenever we are ready for another war.

    I call upon the War Academy to bring forth strategies that could prove useful for the invasion of Greece, should the need arise. Then we could mull over them and have a cohesive plan for when we would need it.

    Simple things such as "which cities to take first", "which side to come in from", etc, really aren't that simple. They make all the difference, and now i ask you to help plan.

    I have attached a overview of the greek lands, and what Apolytonia will include after this war with France and our next (final) war with the Americans. That is about 20-25 turns in the future.

    Draw on the map, no matter how general. Write things down, get everything you can think of down and share it.

    Long live Apolytonia.
    Attached Files
    "I've lived too long with pain. I won't know who I am without it. We have to leave this place, I am almost happy here."
    - Ender, from Ender's Game by Orson Scott Card

  • #2
    I'll get the ball rolling a bit.

    Major Cities
    Athens
    Sparta
    Delphi
    Thermo.

    Points to note
    Greece has 5 major areas:
    • A Hellish Jungle to the West (Smaller cities)
    • A fertile Plain in the middle (Large, Old Cities)
    • A Moutinous coastal Area
    • An Island
    • Floodplains and Luxuries to the north


    Things they have that we want
    • Ivory
    • Wines
    • Iron


    There are a couple of ways to look at the land and plan around it.

    One way would eb to chop down their major cities and then hunt down soem smaller ones before we sue for peace. Very effective because their major cities fall and they lose much production, economy, etc.

    Another way would to be to look at where the borders would end up.

    We'd probably want a continous empire, not one with gaping holes in it where the other civ still resides. Delphi (a jungle ridden size 3 city) now becomes a bit more valuable. Should troops be diverted there, or should we concentrate more on Athens, Sparta and Thermo? Could we pull it all off at once?

    How many stacks should we use? Be reasonable (it's hard, i know). Think about costs / time. I think we'd have knights by this time, how many would we need in how many groups?

    more later.
    "I've lived too long with pain. I won't know who I am without it. We have to leave this place, I am almost happy here."
    - Ender, from Ender's Game by Orson Scott Card

    Comment


    • #3
      I like a concave empire, not convex. Argos, Delphi, and My--whatever are just too pointy into us. Then again, those would be the first cities culture would take.. of course they have more culture than us.

      Now the ivory coast has been settled, but no single city can take all of the coast-- there is still a perfectly good settling spot.

      You mentioned we fear the greek hoplites. But we don't give them too much faith in attacking beyond how we can. So if we extend NW from chicago to the coast, we could declare war, take their northern cities (above us), and possibly attack my--- delphi, and argos. Assuming our cities have walls and spearmen, swordsmen are nothing special to defend against. (I wonder why the AI doesn't make them).

      If we take/destroy enough cities, we can sue them bitterly for peace, taking all cash and techs they may have.

      None of this would remove them from the #1 position on the count, but it would stop their expansion on our continent, and help secure our borders. We might also steal some cities in the process.

      Comment


      • #4
        There are several cities (Athens, Herakleia, Argos) surrounded by mountains, which provide the defense bonus we would need in such a war. I've actually managed to successfully use artillery before to weaken a city's defenses prior to attacking (in the case of Hoplites, this would help). A war with Greece would probably come in the mid-Middle Ages, prior to cannons but after we get knights. Getting a few good-sized stacks onto those mountains, backed up by artillery, we could weaken their defenses enough to be able to take them with minimal casualties.

        Comment


        • #5
          Mycenae also has a mountain adjacent to it, and is very close to Timeline and Del Monte (two cities that will most likely become major military production cities in the future).

          Comment


          • #6
            I think an attack into the greek heartland will be difficult- a campaign to secure the ivory coats and the area between Ephesus and Rhodes would I think be best as a starter- BUt we must keep geopolitics in mind- aftre the next two wars, we might not become #1 in the graph, but will in reality be number one in strenght- which will mean trouble for us diplomatically- we will have to think of possible greek alliences with our current or future neighbors, with Germany and Rome both potential enemies, and I think we would go at this war alone. Thats why I think limited objectves will be best, since war with Greece is various turns in the future, by which time Greece may settle down and begin building up.
            If you don't like reality, change it! me
            "Oh no! I am bested!" Drake
            "it is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong" Voltaire
            "Patriotism is a pernecious, psychopathic form of idiocy" George Bernard Shaw

            Comment


            • #7
              What if, instead of a long offensive, we were to undertake a quick, thrusting attack. It would fragment our front, but might be more productive than a more sustained attack. The way their empire is now (not that that won't change), we could go up by Chicago, take the size two city nextdoor (Name starts with T and is long, but that's all the detail I can make out ) and then grab Athens. Though that wouldn't work if they made many more cities in that area, we could do something of a similar strike, taking their capital and other major cultural and economic centers, and then suing for peace -- overall, weakening them quite a bit.

              I don't know if it's even possible, but in a much later war, we could probably build up a ton of units, put em on boats, and circle the entire contenent -- that, however, would be a major undertaking, and it'd probably just be easier to march our troops streight up.

              One last note -- any plan of this sort would probably leave us without a viable supply line, so we'd have to hit hard enough to ensure we can get peace, and we'd have to have enough forces there to last out for a while should we be unable to -- as such, it doesn't seem like a good plan for now. I think, however, that if we could avoid the mountain ranges on both sides of Greece, we'd be much more effective. On the other hand, if we could take those mountain ranges, they could become very lucrative production cities, and might be worthwhile in that aspect.

              Just a few random thoughts -- I know it's too early to start detailed planning, but if we had to start planning for a war now, this is how I'd be thinking...

              -- adaMada
              Civ 3 Democracy Game:
              PTW Game: Proud member of the Roleplay Team, and Ambassador to Glory of War
              Intersite PTW Game: Member of Apolyton

              Comment


              • #8
                Call me crazy but I think that if the Greek island is discovered to be quite large we could attack it first. By then we'll have ships with a transport capacity of 4 units and my guess would be that those cities will be lightly defended, so 4 knights would be sufficient.
                Basically what I'm proposing is this: if Greece establishes 3 towns or more on that island (and that's a big if, since we still don't know if it's large enough anyway) we could send a transport there with 4 knights and attack their towns, which will probably be very lightly defended. Once we have their 3 towns we would probably be able to sue for peace and get another small continental city as well as some gold/tech.

                Pros:
                * A VERY cheap war. One transport ship and four knights should prove to be enough to take three island towns.
                * The war should be quick so we won't suffer much from war weariness (assuming that by then we switch to a new government type).
                * No Greek counter-attack force against our attacking units.
                * Easy to defend borders. We can't expect the other Greek island towns to counter-attack, but the Greeks will surely attack our continental cities. However we'll have strong border cities by the time we attack, and besides, defending our own cities is much easier than defending newly-captured cities like in a regular war.
                * A nice start against Greece.
                Cons:
                * The attack will not cripple their military production much (surely they're not building military units on the island and then transporting them back to coast).
                * Unless we're lucky and the Greek island towns will find luxuries or much gold, those cities won't be of much use to us in the near future, not even as a front for the 2nd war.

                Comments and suggestions will be appreciated. I'm still toying with this idea.
                "Close your eyes, for your eyes will only tell the truth,
                And the truth isn't what you want to see,
                Close your eyes, and let music set you free..."
                - Phantom of the Opera

                Comment


                • #9
                  Those cities would be very corrupt.
                  It's a long boat ride around Abananaba Minor to get boats there.
                  We'd go through enemy waters, we may have to withdrw (setback or sink).

                  I think a conventional war is best, but I'm open to suggestions. good ideas here.
                  "I've lived too long with pain. I won't know who I am without it. We have to leave this place, I am almost happy here."
                  - Ender, from Ender's Game by Orson Scott Card

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by UberKruX
                    Those cities would be very corrupt.
                    It's a long boat ride around Abananaba Minor to get boats there.
                    We'd go through enemy waters, we may have to withdrw (setback or sink).

                    I think a conventional war is best, but I'm open to suggestions. good ideas here.
                    Regarding corruption: we'll switch government types eventually. We'll also have to move the palace and build a forbidden palace somewhere eventually. Don't get me wrong, I'm not suggesting that we move them to somewhere that would benefit those towns, I'm just making a point.

                    The boat ride is long, yes, but there are other possible routes. For example, if we can settle in ivory coast we can shorten the boat ride. As for entering enemy waters, by the time we set sail we'll be able to safely traverse sea squares. I was counting on it.

                    Anyway, it was just a crazy idea. I didn't expect that anyone would actually support it.
                    "Close your eyes, for your eyes will only tell the truth,
                    And the truth isn't what you want to see,
                    Close your eyes, and let music set you free..."
                    - Phantom of the Opera

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      If a war with Greece is to be "successful" in achieving what we want, we either need to take a lot of cities, or take a few, very important cities - destroying their productivity and culture per turn lead.

                      Number one, if we take Athens, we're gold. That will hurt them really bad in every way. Expect huge losses when we attack, unless we can divert their troops somehow (??). Fast movers are essential to avoid them rushing extra defenders.

                      In order of significance, we need to take:

                      1st Priority
                      Athens (culture, production, central)
                      Sparta (production, central)
                      Thermopylae (gateway city, future benefits)

                      secondary targets
                      Argos (too close to Chicago, good land, need it to consolidate)
                      Mycanae (too close to us, dagger like thrust endangers us in future)
                      Heraklia (completes isolation of Delphi)
                      Ephesus (northern gateway)
                      Anything north of Thermopylae (good land, but will be relatively new and weak)

                      tertiary targets
                      Pharsolos (gateway to Greek isles, good land, but far, across the mtns, not a major threat yet)
                      Delphi (hole in centre, but isolated, jungle ridden)

                      Gravy targets
                      The other cities on the other side of the mountain range and on the island


                      We will need several forces if we want this quick. We'll also need to go in with overwhelming force, much much more than what we have in the last two wars.

                      In order of attack, we should start our major Army A (14 knights, 4 pikes) with Thermopylae (should fall without too much trouble as we can hit it within one turn of declaring), then Athens (10-12k, 3p, within 3-4 turns), then Sparta (4-6k, 2p, within 5-8 turns). with this rolling attack, their borders will fall back and we can use their roads to push ahead. don't wait to heal unless absolutely necessary. If we can get to a mtn tile, we can push our knights ahead of the escorting pikes. leave the pikes to block a counter on the recently captured cities.

                      Simultaneously, use a second small Army B1 (4 knights, plus pike) to take Argos. (1-2 turns)

                      Small Army B2 to take Myceana. (1-2 turns)
                      Converge B1 and B2 on Delphi if sufficient survivors remain.

                      Small Army B3 to take Ephesus or other northern cities. (3-6 turns)

                      Total: 26 knights minimum, 10 pikes for primary and secondary targets. We can probably get Pharsolos or Heraklei or Delphi in a peace deal. Probably 2 cities at least. Estimated time to produce: 50-80 turns of concentrated effort from end of French war. Length of war: <10 turns. Losses due to haste (not healing) offset by gains in avoiding more rushed defenders.

                      Hopefully the French will buffer us, but Paris should be on guard. We may lose Rheims but that's acceptable. Perhaps 2-3 pikes should be stationed in every French city on that road, esp, if our iron is only in France. Other cities don't need to defend much. Army Group B1, B2, B3, can also be used to deflect any Greek attacks on former American lands or on Timeline City.

                      If we don't go for secondary targets, we can reduce B armies to 2 knights just to provide defense against a Greek attack.

                      The above analysis does not consider the effects of other civs getting involved.
                      Proud Citizen of the Civ 3 Demo Game
                      Retired Justice of the Court, Staff member of the War Academy, Staff member of the Machiavelli Institute
                      Join the Civ 3 Demo Game $Mini-Game! ~ Play the Civ 3 Demo Game $Mini-Game!
                      Voici mon secret. Il est très simple: on ne voit bien qu'avec le coeur. L'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        RoP with France

                        First lets get a RoP signed with france. This will get us access to the Greek heartland (Athens/Sparta).

                        Build 2 or 3 large stacks (2-3 pikemen 6-8 knights and 3-6 catapults).

                        Position one at the athens border, and the other two (or one) near chicago.

                        Declare war with Greece, get France allied with us. Hell the Germans might be helpful, but might be too strong to help in the way we need them.

                        With France as our allies, greece will pulverize them while we decimate greece.

                        The Greeks will not be strong enough to keep the easy pickings that are the french and we can take those cities as well.

                        Once we decimate athens, launch another attack from chicago, greece althouth kicking french arse will never be able to keep up.

                        The two stacks fro chicago can split for a northan branch and a southern branch.

                        We can keep reinforcments coming from the south to press the "pokey bit" from two directions.

                        I know that these ideas are sketchy, but it is a basic framework. I will be glad to take this further.

                        Mss
                        Remember.... pillage first then burn.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: RoP with France


                          Position one at the athens border, and the other two (or one) near chicago.
                          Let me change that...

                          Using RoP
                          I would put ...

                          1 stack outside of Athens
                          1 stack outside of Sparta

                          use a third stack from chicago to cut off the protrusion into our rightfull territory. The invasion will continue with help from the spartian invasion stack.

                          This only would take 5-6 cities if all goes well.
                          I would suggest a fourth stack to press towards the ivory coast to increase our gains.

                          The only weakness I see is a counter attack from the east. The hope is that the counter attack would be dispersed by the french.


                          ohh BTW

                          I say call it "Operation Jackal"

                          Mss
                          Remember.... pillage first then burn.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Mss,

                            After we attack France, I really doubt they'll give us an ROP without a serious amount of money on the side, at least for a hundred turns or so, and we can almost forget about a military alliance with them...

                            I'm 'reactivating' this thread since I think it's an important issue, even if this specific thread is eight days old -- the information contained within still applies.

                            -- adaMada
                            Civ 3 Democracy Game:
                            PTW Game: Proud member of the Roleplay Team, and Ambassador to Glory of War
                            Intersite PTW Game: Member of Apolyton

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              It does not seem to me that the Greeks are now much of a threat. The Persians are indeed much more of a threat in my opinion, and I would say, sirs, not to get overexcited when it comes to war. If we have to have a war, sirs, would it not be best to strike at those who really serve as a threat right now, the Persians, who are close to having the iron they need for the Immortals to go into battle fully equipt? I say, sirs, that too much warmongering is unhealthy, and if there must be war, it must be with those who serve more of a threat, and indeed, we can't very well go after both the Persians and the Greeks before the former gets their iron, as then Apolytonia will be overrun, it will be in effect a dead nation, and I would rather lose everything I have here in the city of Apolyton than to see something as horrible as that occur.

                              If you want war, choose to attack those who really serve us as a threat. Anything to the contrary, now at any rate, is folly.
                              Empire growing,
                              Pleasures flowing,
                              Fortune smiles and so should you.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X