I support as long as we do not forget to build up our own territory as a priority. Also, before we march, we need to have some clear objectives. Very clear. Such as, stop when we get the wine, or stop after the last man falls. Either way - as long as we have a clearly defined start and end point.....
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Official : Plan Gold
Collapse
X
-
If you're interested in participating in the first Civ 5 Community Game then please visit: http://www.weplayciv.com/forums/forum.php
-
We do. Our plan is to go after Paris and Orleans, as per Uber's plan, then when the Frenchies sue for peace, ask for Rheims and Chartres as part of the deal. If they refuse, take Rheims and Chartres, then see what we can get (namely, Marseilles). We're also after a leader (for Forbidden Palace) and some elite units.
Here's the war plan.
Comment
-
I too was against this idea for the initial war with france. However, it does seem that it is a good idea. So add me to the converted list. Though I do say, due to the longer prep time, we try to secure at least 3 cities by force before peace talks. Good job OPD
.
AggieThe 5th President, 2nd SMC and 8th VP in the Civ3 Demogame. Also proud member of the GOW team in the PTW game. Peace through superior firepower.
Comment
-
I've converted too. I wanted to focus on infrastructure, but this is a good idea, and we will be able to knock down another apponent and gain more territory and citizens."I bet Ikarus eats his own spunk..."
- BLACKENED from America's Army: Operations
Kramerman - Creator and Author of The Epic Tale of Navalon in the Civ III Stories Forum
Comment
-
i'm voting yes, although i dislike the dead endedness of this plan (swordsmen don't upgrade).
After the wars with France and America, we may just use them as Garrisons
"I've lived too long with pain. I won't know who I am without it. We have to leave this place, I am almost happy here."
- Ender, from Ender's Game by Orson Scott Card
Comment
-
-Or we can keep them until they're no longer needed, then disband them and get some of the shields back. (When a unit is disbanded inside a city, a quarter of the shields it took to build that unit is returned to the city and goes straight into the current build project.)
Anyway, I approve the plan, even though I normally don't like swordsmen all that much...
I prefer knights, which are faster and stronger and can be upgraded to cavalry when the time comes. However, in this case, waiting for them to become available would leave us sitting on our butts for way too long, which is actually a lot worse than having a few units that can't be upgraded. Besides, once you get to cavalry, you're at a dead end anyway, so it's all give and take, I suppose. We need units that can hit hard in 20 turns from now, and at that the swordsmen are the best we can get. So, get the swords and grab us another couple of quick and decisive victories. We can build more advanced units later on, when we more land and a better infrastructure to support them."Politics is to say you are going to do one thing while you're actually planning to do someting else - and then you do neither."
-- Saddam Hussein
Comment
-
They may not be the best garrisons, but they could work until we could dsband them and replace them with musketman. I dont think that ot would be to hard.Originally posted by Sir Ralph
Swordsmen are lousy garrisons, because they don't upgrade. I suggest to replace them ASAP. Let them fill up our army and die out in the battles to come, after their time was gone.
Kman"I bet Ikarus eats his own spunk..."
- BLACKENED from America's Army: Operations
Kramerman - Creator and Author of The Epic Tale of Navalon in the Civ III Stories Forum
Comment
-
Do we really need 10 swordsmen? If you ask me half that many are more than enough. That way we save money and time spent on producing warriors, that way we can start upgrading our cities.
edit: Don't forget, we have 5 archers who can help, and they don't advance beyond longbowmen. So losing them and the swordsmen now won't be the end of the world.2nd Minister of the Economy in the 1st Apolytonia Civ 3 Democracy Game.
Founder and editor of the Berserker Bugle
Comment
-
Well, since war with France appears to have been chosen aready, this is by far the most interesting , original plan, which also gives us space for domestic improvements and growth: a very nice balance overall and a good foundation for the future. great job OPD.
If you don't like reality, change it! me
"Oh no! I am bested!" Drake
"it is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong" Voltaire
"Patriotism is a pernecious, psychopathic form of idiocy" George Bernard Shaw
Comment
-
Thanks Vlad.If you're interested in participating in the first Civ 5 Community Game then please visit: http://www.weplayciv.com/forums/forum.php
Comment
Comment