Historian Campaign Thread

[Panag]

Originally posted by Tassadar5000


Well why not? If you have two skilled writers, only good can come of combining them.

hi ,

or they can start to get at each others throath , ....

have a nice day

[Verto]

They can very easily become competing with each other over who gets to cover what, how much each gets to write, so forth.

Although a coup de'tat over historian would be humorous...

[Nubclear]

Originally posted by Verto
They can very easily become competing with each other over who gets to cover what, how much each gets to write, so forth.

Although a coup de'tat over historian would be humorous...

Or they could write together without conflict. That is also a possibility.

[Verto]

True, of course. Although a coup would sell more papers.

[Nubclear]

Originally posted by Verto
True, of course. Although a coup would sell more papers.

Yeah. And considering how were charging a buck a paper....It would be more profitable as well. (Kidding, of course)

[Captain]

Don't worry about the Constitution.

Further, if our Judicial Amendment passes, then if anyone has a problem with two historians, they can bring the case before the courts to determine the Constitutionality.

I doubt anyone will since having two will only serve to improve the recording of our great nation's history.

If it comes to it, we'll use the precedent set by the existence of Ambassadors and assistants to 'allow' it.

[notyoueither]

I guess the possibility of disagreements that cannot be reconciled may be the best reason to elect 1. The 1 can then name the other as a 'co'-historian (if that is prefered over 'assistant'). If there were a dispute, then it would be clear who decides it.

However, you two seem eager to embark on this together so best of luck to you.

[Timeline]

I agree with NYE, there should be an elected historian, and that man/woman can choose to appoint an assistant if wanted, or even a "co-historian".

[UnOrthOdOx]

I will have to disagree. There are no polocy decisions being made in this position, what real disputes are going to arise? Give teamwork a shot! If these disagreements arise, they could always put it up to public vote...

[Sheik]

How big of a document at the end of the game do we expect to have (Assuming the game goes into the modern age)?

How in-depth will you guys as historians go?

[Nubclear]

Originally posted by Sheik
How big of a document at the end of the game do we expect to have (Assuming the game goes into the modern age)?

This cannot be determined considering still in the ancient era.

How in-depth will you guys as historians go?

Although I cannot speak for my co historian, I will try to go into as much detail as possible without making it confusing for the reader.

[History Guy]

I agree with Tassader. As much detail as possible, with as little confusion as possible.

[notyoueither]

Considering they really can't write yet anyway...