Minister of Imperial Expansion Campaign Thread

[Harovan]

So why can't he tell us that himself?

Who supports Jonny, supports more jungle cities and corrupt ones, just like those he proposed in his illegitimate thread and such like already built. We can't afford more workers to clean more jungle cities. We have only one productive.

[Timeline]

Skywalker was/is the largest supporter of jungle cities> He pushed more than anyone for me to build "Thebes" where it is now...

My personal opinion is: Skywalker has no idea what he is doing. He is a "puppet" for the Imperialist/PFC assembly.

[Kuciwalker]

At the time, that was the best city site. You supported that decision too. I've defended your decision there; if my support was wrong, then you were doubly incompetent.

Sir Ralph, thank you for that suggestion. I generally don't build overlapping cities, so I didn't think of that. I'll put a lot of consideration into that.

[Panag]

Originally posted by Timeline
Skywalker was/is the largest supporter of jungle cities> He pushed more than anyone for me to build "Thebes" where it is now...

My personal opinion is: Skywalker has no idea what he is doing. He is a "puppet" for the Imperialist/PFC assembly.

hi ,

what should he have done , walk around more , ....

you cant blame him for the fact that the gods put us where we are now , ....

have a nice day

[Kuciwalker]

Thank you panag.

[Harovan]

That is all I want. When starting on a bad position, we need sometimes to reconsider our usual behavior. What use do we have from well-placed cities, if they do not grow and reproduce? We already have one jungle city. It can with a big effort get 2 productive tiles in 17 turns. After this, the new to built city should be improved with workers. Again clearing jungle would last too long. You are a warmonger. Jungle cities don't produce units, at least not quick enough. An archer in 20 turns, anyone?

[Panag]

Originally posted by Sir Ralph
That is all I want. When starting on a bad position, we need sometimes to reconsider our usual behavior. What use do we have from well-placed cities, if they do not grow and reproduce? We already have one jungle city. It can with a big effort get 2 productive tiles in 17 turns. After this, the new to built city should be improved with workers. Again clearing jungle would last too long. You are a warmonger. Jungle cities don't produce units, at least not quick enough. An archer in 20 turns, anyone?

hi ,

look , nothing is lost , okay it shall take longer to civilize the surroundings of the jungle , but , they dont have to be the "key" in the nation , they could develop slowly , with the jungle cut down , and the bonus grassland irrigated , and the none B grass reforested they could do well by the third era , ... good enough to produce those few extra units that will make the difference , .....

have a nice day

[Kingof the Apes]

Right now we should build workers more than settlers, as we need to clear land and there is no place to build a good city.

[Panag]

Originally posted by Kingof the Apes
Right now we should build workers more than settlers, as we need to clear land and there is no place to build a good city.

hi ,

there is land , after the jungle , ...

have a nice day

[Jonny]

Sir Ralph:

How is my thread illegitimate?

And about me supporting jungle cities and corrupt cities: they're about the only things we have. So what if you have one good city site: where are going to build the cities after that?

And about your city site: It will probably only have one shield a turn, too, just like any other jungle city. Only one of those grassland squares have a shield, and the one with a shield is being used by Apolyton.

By the way, next time you (or anyone) have an idea about where to build a city, tell the IE Minister. We can't read your minds, you know.

Remember, Vote for Jonny. I listen to all the people and value their opinions, as I said earlier.

Don't vote for the UFC candidate! He seems to be a puppet for the UFC, and some of his supporters seem to be falling to the low level of having to use a 'smear campaign.'

[Inverse Icarus]

Originally posted by Jonny
Don't vote for the UFC candidate! He seems to be a puppet for the UFC, and his supporters seem to be falling to the low level of having to use a 'smear campaign.'

i take offense to that.

[Jonny]

Woah, that was a major typo on my part.

It should have said "some of his supporters."

My apologies to those who were offended that shouldn't have been offended.

[Harovan]

Originally posted by Jonny
How is my thread illegitimate?

You have no right to take "official" polls until you are elected.

And about me supporting jungle cities and corrupt cities: they're about the only things we have. So what if you have one good city site: where are going to build the cities after that?

I begin feel like a parrot. Everybody wants me to repeat the same. Ok, for those who understand slowly, here's the plan:

- Build 1 or even 2 more productive cities (see nye's plan, it's pretty good)
- Build barracks
- Build 6 archers and 2 spears
- give them to UberKrux, he'll make you space to settle.
- Build reinforcements
- Enjoy 1-2 cities, 2-3 techs and more room to settle he'll beat out of the French

The other plan is:

- Build more jungle cities
- Clean the jungle tiles
- In the early AD's we can have 4 productive cities.
- The same time the AI has 12 or 15 and is 10 techs ahead. Each.
- The game is most likely lost.

Simple.

You have the choice.

[civman2000]

Ralph: look at the poll thread, I explained exactly how the poll is legitimate by the code of laws. I'm beginning to feel like a parrot too

[Harovan]

If you call the unfinished constitution (which you are opposed to, btw) "code of laws", there is nothing about "deputies". Care to provide a link, fearless keeper of law and order?