Ratification of the Constitution

[ManicStarSeed]

This thing really need some help, but it is a good start. I think that Trip is just trying to shake things up. Good job Trip.

Ive done this stuff before for intentional communities , and it is always shocking to see it on paper. they generally need to change, but not as much as you first think.

We need an impartial body somewhere. The historian is fine, but we need a court system to make judgment calls. How about a group of three justices that help with "invalid" polling, Temporary assignments and the such.

[Jon Shafer]

NYE, CM, punkbass, Linney were, IIRC. Ninot wanted some clarification, but I don't think that counts as an official gripe.

[Panag]

Originally posted by ManicStarSeed
This thing really need some help, but it is a good start. I think that Trip is just trying to shake things up. Good job Trip.

Ive done this stuff before for intentional communities , and it is always shocking to see it on paper. they generally need to change, but not as much as you first think.

We need an impartial body somewhere. The historian is fine, but we need a court system to make judgment calls. How about a group of three justices that help with "invalid" polling, Temporary assignments and the such.

hi ,

remember the senate , ..... it could take a lot of stress from some shoulders , it would be a group that is neutral , and that supports the government , .....

and they would rule on any court issue's , ...

it would have to be 5-7 people , ...

have a nice day

[Spiffor]

I have to agree with NYE
I can't vote for this consitution, as a 2/3 majority will be required to correct this flawed document, and a 2/3 majority will be nigh impossible to reach with partisan politics.
Almost the whole document is good, since many elements have been voted (majority and initiative for impeachment, mobilization, amendment).
But the flaws civman referred to need to be adressed without rushing things.

[Kuciwalker]

NAY NAY NAY

[Jon Shafer]

Originally posted by notyoueither
That means we'll be left with this... dictated document. Little or no discussion. Tyrannical clauses added with zero discussion.

Vote yes. Vote for Timeline and Trip to dictate our constitution. Bahhhhh!

I suppose the people want a tyranny, as the votes stack up.

[Kuciwalker]

Doesn't this need a 2/3 majority to pass? If so, then it's not going to make it the way the votes are now.

[Inverse Icarus]

Originally posted by skywalker
Doesn't this need a 2/3 majority to pass? If so, then it's not going to make it the way the votes are now.

it is pretty close though...

[Panag]

Originally posted by skywalker
Doesn't this need a 2/3 majority to pass? If so, then it's not going to make it the way the votes are now.

hi ,

it has two thirds now , .....

we can only hope that more people vote , ....

have a nice day

[Jon Shafer]

Originally posted by skywalker
Doesn't this need a 2/3 majority to pass? If so, then it's not going to make it the way the votes are now.

Says who, there's no rules remember.

[Kuciwalker]

Panag, 2/3 is 66.67%. It has 63.64%. Not quite 2/3.

Trip, if it doesn't have a 2/3 majority but we say it "passes", it would, by its own provisions, become invalid, after which it would be valid, creating paradox and making the entire forum blink into nonexistance.

[Panag]

hi ,

, some people shall vote yes , so lets go the american way on this , this or that person say's , i shall vote for this or that , BUT i want to propese an amend this or that , ....

it could work , .....

have a nice day

[Panag]

Originally posted by skywalker
Panag, 2/3 is 66.67%. It has 63.64%. Not quite 2/3.

Trip, if it doesn't have a 2/3 majority but we say it "passes", it would, by its own provisions, become invalid, after which it would be valid, creating paradox and making the entire forum blink into nonexistance.

hi ,

it changed , ....

we should mobilize more people , ...

have a nice day

[Kuciwalker]

It didn't change. It's still at 63.64%.

[Kingof the Apes]

We have 150 members and there is 33 votes?

???