Long term strategy

[The Thing]

What is our long term strategy for this game. I think it is important to decide if we going to be warmongers or builders or somewhere in between.

If we are going to be warmongers we must decide quickly because an early attack is very important.

[Jon Shafer]

Well, we're trying to work around the massive jungle. If that means war, then so be it. If we can get around it without war, then that's better. We'll see though, no guarantees on anything until we know more (it's only 3500 BC ya know).

[Vlad Antlerkov]

Well, builder is pretty much impossible AFAWK, and there's not much support to go Momentum (to use an SMAC term).

We'll probably end up Hybrid, leaning Warmonger.

[Kuciwalker]

With Uber as War Minister, this is our policy: KILLKILLKILL

[Panag]

Re: Long term strategy

Originally posted by The Thing
What is our long term strategy for this game. I think it is important to decide if we going to be warmongers or builders or somewhere in between.

If we are going to be warmongers we must decide quickly because an early attack is very important.

hi ,

there are no long term , thoughts , why , well , we have no office of strategic intelligence , and we have no minister of information , ....

so , nothing about long term planning , ...

unfortunatly , ...

have a nice day

[Vlad Antlerkov]

Trip: Long term strategory, dude...

Skywalker: I think you're oversimplifying it. Or not.

[The Thing]

If we go full warmonger i suggest putting the science slider to 10% after we got the necessary techs to attack our enemies. The money we can use for supporting a big army.

Also i like to use rushing units in cities that produce a lot of food and have granaries.

[Kuciwalker]

Oversimplifying? I'm adding complexity here!