Tweet
This is intended to be the official poll on whether we should have military commanders. To find out what I mean by that, look here. Moral Hazard pointed out that it would be unfair to have a poll that didn't state when it would end at the beginning and didn't expire (as this would allow whoever posted the poll to sort of "fix" the results), so this poll will expire next Friday. Please note that I don't think this should be implemented immediately, just that the Minister of War or the President should have the option of implementing it if needed.
-
37Yes40.54%15Yes59.46%22The poll is expired.
-
Oops. Please consider the second option as NO. I wasn't thinking and mistyped.
-
Choices:
Yes
Yes
What happened to poor No??
Comment
-
Read my post.Comment
-
Hmm I think the last one was better. What you can do is declare that the votes will be collected on the issue 48hrs or more before you do. So you could still use the last poll. You just have to specify an ending date.Accidently left my signature in this post.Comment
-
I think that military commanders will put too many chefs in the kitchen so to speak. One person can handle the job and will have a better vision of the overall stategy of the war.Est-ce que tu as vu une baleine avec un queue taché?
If you don't feel the slightist bit joyful seeing the Iraqis dancing in the street, then you are lost to the radical left. If you don't feel the slightest bit bad that we had to use force to do this, then you are lost to the radical right.Comment
-
I can say a firm YES !
(I voted for the first yes, for the reasons I stated in the other thread)"I have been reading up on the universe and have come to the conclusion that the universe is a good thing." -- Dissident
"I never had the need to have a boner." -- Dissident
"I have never cut off my penis when I was upset over a girl." -- DisComment
-
If there was a 'no' on this poll I would vote for it. Instead I voted for 'yes' #2.
Comment
-
spacewalker:
By next friday. You mean Friday 6/21 right?Accidently left my signature in this post.Comment
-
I changed it to next monday. Also, it's skywalker.Comment
-
"I've lived too long with pain. I won't know who I am without it. We have to leave this place, I am almost happy here."
- Ender, from Ender's Game by Orson Scott CardComment
-
I said yes, but only in the late game when we have a very large empire and so many units that it's worthwhile dividing up the responsibility. (This would be more useful if they could actually control the units - instead the President has to do it all anyways.)
Then again, I also think it'd be neat if we had "mayors" for each city whose sole job it was to promote their cities welfare (even if at the expense of other cities or the feds - just like real life). Of course, ministers wouldn't have to listen to mayors. It would just give some citizens their own little roles to play and give them some other reasons for voting the way they do. "What? You rush built a temple and library in Flin Flon but you won't rush build a marketplace for Toronto???"
Or instead of mayors, citizens can pick 'hometowns' - gives some ownership and adds a bit of fun. As it is, all the cities are the same - just boring centres for production.Proud Citizen of the Civ 3 Demo Game
Retired Justice of the Court, Staff member of the War Academy, Staff member of the Machiavelli Institute
Join the Civ 3 Demo Game $Mini-Game! ~ Play the Civ 3 Demo Game $Mini-Game!
Voici mon secret. Il est très simple: on ne voit bien qu'avec le coeur. L'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux.Comment
-
Ahhh...that's how you make people vote for what you want them to vote
This space is empty... or is it?Comment
-
For now I dont see any need for them but I suggest we repoll on this one later in the game.
(when we actualy have some units )
Comment
-
anything that takes power away from the citizen would make the game LESS fun. more polls - less government posts.DANGER! - Unexploded CivilianComment
Comment