In many of the polls I've noticed that there are a lot of options, while this is great for finding out what people think it's terrible for actually making a decision. Take the term limits poll I believe the current leader is no term limits however if you add the total votes for positions supporting term limits they outweigh those against. For this reason I propose that there should be runoffs between the popular options. I'm not sure what the exact methodology should be however; any thoughts.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
A problem with the polls.
Collapse
X
-
what about making decision threads for a minimum of 2 days mandatory before posting a poll?
this would run like this, for example:
a discussion is taken, after 2 days, somone summarizes the discussion into the poll threads. those can be discussed for 1 day. next, a poll with the discussed options would be posted and cross-linked (a link from poll to discussion and one in the other direction).
negative aspect of this:
it would lead to 2+1=3 days of discussion + polling time before we have a conclusion.
i believe polls also should be kept up for a minimum of 2 and a optimum of 4 days, so we would need about 1 week for taking a decission, which may be too long.
-
-
However, I think that the two best options can be used in a finalization run. (At least for that poll´(We don't need the results for a while anyway)Creator of the Civ3MultiTool
Comment
-
Now we're getting near the problem of democracy; efficency. Maybe we next time should make a "Civ3 - Tyrrany" game?Do not fear, for I am with you; Do not anxiously look about you, for I am your God.-Isaiah 41:10
I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made - Psalms 139.14a
Also active on WePlayCiv.
Comment
-
This thread would be a good place to discuss these concerns, and propose solutions."I used to be a Scotialist, and spent a brief period as a Royalist, but now I'm PC"
-me, discussing my banking history.
Comment
Comment