The polls were set up with the highest vote getter being the winner. To change strategies in the middle would invalidate the polls; requiring a revote with the new rules clearly spelled out. This wouldn't be represented of a democracy which is what we are trying to be.
Why is it a mistake to go with the highest? The middle doesn't always win. How does picking the center result in the best situation for everyone overall? Sure sounds like averaging to me, or close enough that it really doesn't matter (Mean, Median, Mode theory). It also results in the middle must winning, since you are choosing the center of the range(s). The purpose of a poll is a vote. In voting, the most votes win, whether we are in the winning/losing position.
Averaging doesn't matter what there is a fairly even grouping for each choice. You can either add up all the scores and divide by the number of votes. or you can weight average, ot use some other form of averaging.
Next time, let's define exactly how we are going to figure out the winner before offering a poll. If you don't, then people will believe the highest vote getter wins.
Why is it a mistake to go with the highest? The middle doesn't always win. How does picking the center result in the best situation for everyone overall? Sure sounds like averaging to me, or close enough that it really doesn't matter (Mean, Median, Mode theory). It also results in the middle must winning, since you are choosing the center of the range(s). The purpose of a poll is a vote. In voting, the most votes win, whether we are in the winning/losing position.
Averaging doesn't matter what there is a fairly even grouping for each choice. You can either add up all the scores and divide by the number of votes. or you can weight average, ot use some other form of averaging.
Next time, let's define exactly how we are going to figure out the winner before offering a poll. If you don't, then people will believe the highest vote getter wins.
Comment