Announcement

**GodKing** · April 29, 2003, 17:08

Sounds good. Let me know if you need / want any assistance in any DM aspects.

**UnOrthOdOx** · April 29, 2003, 17:14

Let me get that second city up, and Ill start dishing them out/organizing

**GodKing** · April 29, 2003, 17:50

So, nest term then... ok.

**Inverse Icarus** · April 29, 2003, 19:01

that tile has the bonus. i checked the sav in MWIA's post

does your plan have any chance of changing? what if we see stuff from the mountain? what would there have to be to make you change your mind?

**BigFree** · April 29, 2003, 19:04

Originally posted by UberKruX

does your plan have any chance of changing? what if we see stuff from the mountain? what would there have to be to make you change your mind?

8 (or more) cattle tiles nearby would do it for me!

**UnOrthOdOx** · April 29, 2003, 21:11

Originally posted by UberKruX
that tile has the bonus. i checked the sav in MWIA's post

does your plan have any chance of changing? what if we see stuff from the mountain? what would there have to be to make you change your mind?

A food bonus that would bring it in the full radius if I moved W instead. I dont want to move more than one turn. Anything further away will make a good site for a settler pump as the first city out.

**Kloreep** · April 29, 2003, 23:45

Why two warriors? Shouldn't we build at least one more scout, and take advantage of our expansionist trait?

Edit: Granted, we'll need protection from those raging hordes. But without building any scouts, I think we're losing out on part of that civ trait.

**Panzer32** · April 29, 2003, 23:59

"DM minister" = Domestic Minister minister??

anyways, I agree with Kloreep. We should build at least 2 more explorers. Barbarians do not tend to be such a big problem for the first 10 turns, so I don't see an undefended city as that big a deal.

**MrWhereItsAt** · April 30, 2003, 00:31

Really? A bonus?

And, if we don't use it for the Capital, I propose the city name "Asgard" - home of the Gods.

Of course, that would be PERFECT for the capital... (nudge, wink)

EDIT: Or maybe not.... Valhalla was within Asgard, so perhaps we chould consider naming our landmass Asgard instead...

**UnOrthOdOx** · April 30, 2003, 08:37

Originally posted by Kloreep
Why two warriors? Shouldn't we build at least one more scout, and take advantage of our expansionist trait?

Edit: Granted, we'll need protection from those raging hordes. But without building any scouts, I think we're losing out on part of that civ trait.

Noted and changed. Thanks.

**Aro** · April 30, 2003, 09:02

Originally posted by Kloreep
Why two warriors? Shouldn't we build at least one more scout, and take advantage of our expansionist trait?

Edit: Granted, we'll need protection from those raging hordes. But without building any scouts, I think we're losing out on part of that civ trait.

I don't have any experience in Deity, but... Well, those Ottomans aren't so aggressive, but they have 2 spears in their second city. We may need some extra protection, just in case...

**UnOrthOdOx** · April 30, 2003, 09:19

We have a decision at present. We can either produce a THIRD scout, or a SECOND warrior before our first settler (due in 11 turns).

Personally I favor military units, but am willing to hear opinions/arguements for the scout.

**MrWhereItsAt** · April 30, 2003, 09:22

Warrior. Once our scouts have got out this far, another will not help considerably. Warriors have attack and defense values, can bring martial law and if I build a Warrior then we can convince Uber we are getting him those Swords he wants so badly...

**UnOrthOdOx** · April 30, 2003, 09:25

Im a bit worried that both our scouts are heading N, though. minimap suggests we are already a bit to the norther end, another to head south/east?

Announcement

DM Minister Office

DM Minister Office

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment