Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What's the deal with Uncle Fester !?!?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    I could not believe my eyes when I first saw Joan in the modern age. She looked so cute in the industrial age in her blue uniform. What a disapointment in the modern age. Why couldn't they have put her in a cute little white navy suit or something.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by monkspider


      Gotta love right-wingers and their "PC-conspiracy theories"
      Gotta love left-wingers and their "Ad hominem attacks"

      Comment


      • #18
        Haha, I agree about Joan D'arc though.

        Who didn't want Napoleon to be the leader of the French? Wouldn't negotiating with the little fella be more fun?

        Having 1:1 male female ratio's is just good marketing sense.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by CygnusZ
          Haha, I agree about Joan D'arc though.

          Who didn't want Napoleon to be the leader of the French? Wouldn't negotiating with the little fella be more fun?

          Having 1:1 male female ratio's is just good marketing sense.
          Charlemagne, Louis the XVII.

          Either one. But I'm into that era of history more, so that's just me.

          It's all good. Civ is about what ifs. Obviously the Zulu were not meant to dominate the world, but what if they did? What if history was different? Joan had as much potential as anyone.

          Comment


          • #20
            bah!

            I WANT JOE STALIN!

            Also, come to think of it, Napoleon would kind of kick butt too. But, whenever you see him in the negotiation screen, he's too short so he's just peering over the bottom of the window

            ER

            Comment


            • #21
              If you guys missed it, the bald Joan D'Arc is a reference to GI Jane.
              AI:C3C Debug Game Report (Part1) :C3C Debug Game Report (Part2)
              Strategy:The Machiavellian Doctrine
              Visit my WebsiteMonkey Dew

              Comment


              • #22
                Homage. Fromage.

                Andy: Catherine is a dog, though! They should have had her in leather in the modern age.

                Bill: good stuff. Stick around. I agree with the PC stuff, but I don't think this stuff needs to follow such a strict non-PC, historic course. I mean, wives have to like this game for something.
                I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                Comment


                • #23
                  Joan is still the most feminine and eye pleasing of them all .

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by DanS

                    Bill: good stuff. Stick around. I agree with the PC stuff, but I don't think this stuff needs to follow such a strict non-PC, historic course. I mean, wives have to like this game for something.
                    Well, let's put in the Scots & give them their choice of leaders:

                    Sean Connery
                    William Wallace (as portrayed by Mel Gibson)

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by CygnusZ
                      Haha, I agree about Joan D'arc though.

                      Who didn't want Napoleon to be the leader of the French? Wouldn't negotiating with the little fella be more fun?
                      Yes, especially if all you could see was the top of his head and the big hat.
                      "Barbarism is the natural state of mankind... Civilization is unnatural. It is a whim of circumstance. And barbarism must always triumph."

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by CygnusZ
                        Having 1:1 male female ratio's is just good marketing sense.

                        Good marketing sense was Civ II's option to have the leader be of either sex.

                        But besides that, is there really an equal number of men and women playing any computer game, let alone Civ III? The only people they would have offended by dropping some of the female leaders is people who are already hypersensitive over it.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Styria


                          Good marketing sense was Civ II's option to have the leader be of either sex.
                          It's not good marketing sense to ship with only half the leader gaphics done, though.
                          Rethink Refuse Reduce Reuse

                          Do It Ourselves

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Who cares whether Joan is historically correct (or significant)? At least there's one leader who is pleasant to look at. Lincoln scares me.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              He looks like an Amish dude :-P

                              But I like Americans all the way
                              AI:C3C Debug Game Report (Part1) :C3C Debug Game Report (Part2)
                              Strategy:The Machiavellian Doctrine
                              Visit my WebsiteMonkey Dew

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                well...

                                I WANT JOE STALIN!
                                Sorry to break this comic thread, but I'd just like to make a comment on the above, being Russian after all...

                                Making Stalin the leader of Russia would be like making Hitler the leader of Germany...historically accurate, but it makes dealing with that civ unpleasant and sort of ruins that civilization. Stalin killed over twenty million innocent Russians because of his paranoia (this is in one of the darker corners of history) and let twenty million more die in WWII...

                                ...just a comment !

                                Also, for whoever who said Catherine is a bad leader...she was actually probably the second-greatest after Peter the Great, and the best female choice ...

                                - Me
                                (I like to bicker and correct others)

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X