Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Expansion Pack Civs (Part 4): A never-ending story?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Expansion Pack Civs (Part 4): A never-ending story?

    Attention: overall ranking has been moved to the second post.
    Too many people are voting without knowing the rules (properly) so I moved the rules up to make them easier to spot. Also, this way the first post can serve as a central point with relevant links for this thread and the Apolyton ExtraCivs Pack (see bottom of post).

    Okay, contrary to my habits, I'll try and keep this short (or as short as possible anyway )...

    For historical purposes, here are Parts previous incarnations of this discussion:
    Expansion Pack Civs: One more thread... (Let's do it right)
    Expansion Pack Civs (Part 2) (temporary thread due to forum problems, started by MarkG)
    Expansion Pack Civs (Part 3): Just one more...

    If you want to read about the history or background of this poll, see the old threads. What it boils down to is that a lot of people aren't completely happy with the civs included in Civ3 (or more accurately, with the civs not included). So the idea of this poll is to give everyone an oppurtunity to vote for the civs they would like to see in a future Civ3 expansion pack, presuming Firaxis ever decides to make one.

    Rules
    In this poll, you can give points to civs that you would like to see included in an expansion pack, with the following restrictions (which have as sole purpose to prevent this thread from being 'abused' in any way):

    1) You must vote for at least 6 civs and for at most 16 (you can vote for any civ you want that isn't already in Civ3, whether it's a 'big one' like Spain or a 'small one' like Liechtenstein);
    2) You must give at least 80 points and at most 160 (the more points, the more important you feel the civ is);
    3) You can give at most 20 points per civ;
    4) I, Locutus, am the 'moderator' of this poll and have to right to refuse or change any vote (immediately or retroactively) if I find it for whatever reason unsuitable; I will always announce any change or refusal and if you don't agree with my decisions, you can either change or retract your vote;
    5) This poll is intended to be a representation of the wishes of the Apolyton community, so do not promote/advertise or otherwise mention this thread outside Apolyton or to non-Apolytoners; if you're not an Apolytoner yourself but just 'passing by' or found a link to this poll outside Apolyton, please don't vote.


    Next, there are a few 'rules' that are intended to facilitate me in moderating this poll:

    6) If you just post civ names and no points, the points will be distributed equally among all choices. So if you post 16 names without points, all choices will get 10 points. If you post 8 names, all choices will get 20 points. If you don't agree with the points I assigned to your choices, give points yourself in the first place or change your vote afterwards (see below).
    7) If you wish to change your vote for any reason, that's possible; but please don't edit your existing post or just post a new list. This would be very confusing for me to keep track of. Instead, only post the changes you wish to make. FE, if you already voted but see someone vote for the Cubans and think 'that's brilliant, why didn't I think of that?', you can change your vote by posting 'Arabs -7, Cubans +7' or something like that. Please do this even if you still have enough points left, so I can doublecheck to make sure you don't exceed the maximum number of civs/points. So if you only 'spent' 150 points over 12 civs, don't just posts 'Cubans 10' but rather 'Cubans +10'. TIA for doing so.

    I think rules 1, 2, 3, 6 and 7 are pretty obvious but 4 and 5 may need some explanation:
    - Rule 4 is mostly for emergency situations, I don't plan on refusing votes on a large scale or changing people's vote to suit my own agenda or whatever. It's intention is to allow me to intervene in the exceptional case where people are (willingly or unwillingly) 'abusing' this thread. In the eyes of of most people it was probably already an unwritten rule in the past. I might also use this rule for things like merging similar civs together, preventing people from voting for non-civs like poodles/Washington Redskins/AC Milan/Britney Spears fans/whatever, stuff like that.
    - Rule 5 is undoubtably the most controversial one, it's basically a drastic shift in the focus of this poll. The reason for this is that Apolyton is an international community with people from all over the world, and at least 95% of these people is intelligent and reasonable enough to not (willingly or unwillingly) use this thread for their own political agenda but to cast an well thought-out vote for all civs they truly think should be in a Civ3 expansion pack. The opinion of the average Apolytoners most likely isn't all that different from the opinion of the average Civ player. If nothing else, the 'Polish invasion' showed us that when non-Apolytoners are involved in this discussion, it's impossible to guarantee that these people will cast equally well thought-out votes and to an equal degree represent the entire world community. Even though the opinion of an 'outsider' is just as important and valuable as the opinion of an Apolytoner, it would only have any value for this poll if *all* 'outsiders' everywhere in the world would be informed about the existance of this poll and would be allowed to vote, something which is practically impossible.
    I realize full well that it's near to impossible to enforce this rule, I'm relying on the common courtesy and decency of all involved not to break this rule. Let it be very clear: I certainly do not plan on declaring all settlers who registered within days or hours before posting their first post in this thread 'suspects'. I know there are many long-time lurkers out there, some of them could be (and even have been) persuaded by this poll to finally register and vote. They may not have a public history on Apolyton but they are Apolytoners non-the-less. The same goes for newcomers who happen to make (one of) their first posts in this poll, they may not have been Apolytoners for very long but they are here to stay and thus have every right to call themselves that.
    The only people that are not 'allowed' to vote are people that hardly or never visited Apolyton in the past and don't have any intention of coming back in the future. Normally these people will only find this poll if it's advertised by others (like LoD did earlier), so that's why I ask all everyone not to promote this poll outside Apolyton.

    Examples
    Here are some example civs to guide you in picking your civs (by no means exhaustive, feel free to post others): (Africa) Bantu, Zimbabwe, Swahili, Nigeria, Benin, Ghana, Mali, Moors, Morocco, Ethiopia/Axum, Nubia, Carthage, South Africa/Boer (Americas) Eskimo, Canada, Sioux, Cheyenne, Apache, Navajo, Hopi, Olmec, Maya, Inca, Tolmec, Mexico, Brazil, Argentina (Oceania) Maori, Aboriginals, Australia, Polynesia, Philippines, Indonesia (Asia) Khmer, Siam/Thai, Burma/Myanmar, Cambodia, Mongol, Annam/Vietnam, Korea, Tibet, Tamil, Sikh, Moghul, Kazakh, Pakistan, Parthia, Bactria, Armenia, Arabia, Hebrew, Hittites, Sumerian, Turkish/Ottomans, Byzantine, Phoenicia, Fillistines(sp?), Iraq (Europe) Spanish, Dutch, Minoan, Celts, Viking, Polish, Austria(-Hungary), Italy, Sweden, Norway, Finland, Danish, Scots, Irish, Belgium, Portuguese, Basque, Slavic, Serbia, Macedonia, Czech, Swiss, Bulgaria, Ukraine, Goths (for more: see ranking)

    Ranking
    Finally, in the post below you can see the latest update of the overall ranking. You can download an Excel worksheet with the complete data of this poll here (right-click and select 'Save Target As...').



    Links
    Below are links to discussions the most popular civs in the poll. Discussions on the properties of the top 16 civs can be held in these threads:

    ArabsEthiopians&nbspMayaPortuguese&nbsp
    Byzantines&nbspHebrewMongolsSpanish
    CeltsIncaPolesTurks
    Dutch
    KoreansPhoenicians&nbspVikings


    (Other links will be put here)
    Last edited by Locutus; November 14, 2001, 10:53.
    Administrator of WePlayCiv -- Civ5 Info Centre | Forum | Gallery

  • #2
    Ranking

    Last update: wervdon (time & date: see 'Last edited' at bottom), 252 valid votes casted, 38267 points given (= 94.9% of total # of points possible)

    #&nbspCivilizationsPointsVotes%
    1. Spanish
    3131
    181
    8,2%
    2. Mongols
    2831
    167
    7,4%
    3. Arab
    2665
    160
    7,0%
    4. Inca
    2533
    163
    6,6%
    5. Vikings
    2368
    147
    6,2%
    6. Turks/Ottomans
    2304
    149
    6,0%
    7. Phoenicians/Carthaginians
    1489
    100
    3,9%
    8. Maya
    1314
    95
    3,4%
    9. Celts
    1291
    88
    3,4%
    10. Portuguese
    1228
    82
    3,2%
    11. Dutch
    1178
    86
    3,1%
    12. Hebrew/Israelis
    1108
    78
    2,9%
    13. Ethiopians/Aksumites
    956
    62
    2,5%
    14. Poles
    943
    59
    2,5%
    15. Koreans
    799
    48
    2,1%
    16. Khmer
    662
    44
    1,7%
    17. Byzantines
    660
    44
    1,7%
    18. Polynesians
    654
    48
    1,7%
    19. Mali(ans)
    560
    41
    1,5%
    20. Austrians/Austro-Hungarians
    495
    32
    1,3%
    21. Huns
    386
    26
    1,0%
    22. Inuit/Eskimos/Aleutians
    374
    27
    1,0%
    23. Assyrians
    340
    24
    0,9%
    24. Australians
    340
    24
    0,9%
    25. Sioux/Dakota
    308
    29
    0,8%
    26. (Australian) Aborigines
    298
    20
    0,8%
    27. Magyar/Hungarians
    268
    21
    0,7%
    28. Siamese/Thai
    262
    20
    0,7%
    29. Brazilians
    250
    18
    0,7%
    30. Scots
    250
    17
    0,7%
    31. Swedes
    241
    16
    0,6%
    32. Tibetans
    226
    18
    0,6%
    33. Slavs
    200
    14
    0,5%
    34. Canadians
    180
    12
    0,5%
    35. Annam/Vietnamese
    177
    14
    0,5%
    36. Sumerians
    175
    13
    0,5%
    37. Czech
    168
    11
    0,4%
    38. Apache
    159
    12
    0,4%
    39. Serbs
    145
    8
    0,4%
    40. Neanderthals
    143
    8
    0,4%
    41. Ukrainians
    130
    9
    0,3%
    42. Minoans
    125
    8
    0,3%
    43. Goths
    120
    9
    0,3%
    44. Hittites
    110
    9
    0,3%
    45. Indonesians
    110
    9
    0,3%
    46. Zimbabweans
    109
    10
    0,3%
    47. Ghanaians/Accrans
    107
    9
    0,3%
    48. Swiss
    105
    6
    0,3%
    49. Italians/Venetians
    100
    8
    0,3%
    50. Argentinians
    100
    6
    0,3%
    51. Cubans
    100
    5
    0,3%
    52. Welsh
    100
    5
    0,3%
    53. Nubians/Ku****es
    99
    8
    0,3%
    54. Native Americans/American Indians
    91
    9
    0,2%
    55. Holy Romans/Catholics/Vaticans
    90
    6
    0,2%
    56. Irish
    90
    6
    0,2%
    57. Trojans
    86
    6
    0,2%
    58. Latvians
    86
    5
    0,2%
    59. Fins
    85
    5
    0,2%
    60. Scandinavians
    80
    6
    0,2%
    61. Bantu
    75
    6
    0,2%
    62. Tartars
    70
    4
    0,2%
    63. Nigerians/Swagilians
    60
    6
    0,2%
    64. Songhai
    60
    5
    0,2%
    65. Belgians
    60
    3
    0,2%
    66. Confederates
    60
    3
    0,2%
    67. Crown of Aragorn
    60
    3
    0,2%
    68. Kazakhs
    55
    5
    0,1%
    69. South East Asians
    55
    4
    0,1%
    70. Olmec
    52
    6
    0,1%
    71. Berbers/Moors
    50
    5
    0,1%
    72. Maori
    50
    3
    0,1%
    73. Californians
    48
    3
    0,1%
    74. Harappans/Dravidians/Indus People
    46
    5
    0,1%
    75. Mexicans
    44
    5
    0,1%
    76. Anasazi
    40
    4
    0,1%
    77. Cherokee
    40
    4
    0,1%
    78. Amazonians (Native Brazilians)
    40
    3
    0,1%
    79. Armenians
    40
    3
    0,1%
    80. Danes
    40
    3
    0,1%
    81. Etruscs
    40
    3
    0,1%
    82. Filipinos
    40
    3
    0,1%
    83. Swahili/Kilwans
    40
    3
    0,1%
    84. Iraqis
    40
    2
    0,1%
    85. Indo-Malays/Austronesians
    35
    2
    0,1%
    86. Muslims/Near East Asians
    35
    2
    0,1%
    87. Quebecois
    33
    3
    0,1%
    88. Uzbek/LithuUzbek
    32
    3
    0,1%
    89. Texans
    31
    3
    0,1%
    90. Boers
    30
    3
    0,1%
    91. Iberians
    30
    2
    0,1%
    92. Iranians
    30
    2
    0,1%
    93. Norwegians
    30
    2
    0,1%
    94. Philistinians
    30
    2
    0,1%
    95. Macedonians
    29
    2
    0,1%
    96. Hmong
    28
    3
    0,1%
    97. South Africans
    25
    3
    0,1%
    98. Bulgarians
    25
    2
    0,1%
    99. Virginians
    25
    2
    0,1%
    100. Amazons
    22
    2
    0,1%
    101. Navaho
    20
    3
    0,1%
    102. Hawaiians
    20
    2
    0,1%
    103. Al-Alandalus
    20
    1
    0,1%
    104. Almerienses
    20
    1
    0,1%
    105. Bangladeshis
    20
    1
    0,1%
    106. Bedouin
    20
    1
    0,1%
    107. Cartagenians (from Cartagena)
    20
    1
    0,1%
    108. Castilla-Leon/Castillians
    20
    1
    0,1%
    109. Pygmy
    20
    1
    0,1%
    110. Seljuks
    20
    1
    0,1%
    111. Singaporeans
    20
    1
    0,1%
    112. Snake Mounds
    20
    1
    0,1%
    113. Ugandians
    20
    1
    0,1%
    114. Liechtenstein
    17
    2
    0,0%
    115. Luxembourg
    17
    1
    0,0%
    116. Yankees
    15
    2
    0,0%
    117. Algonquiens
    15
    1
    0,0%
    118. Manchu(rian)s
    15
    1
    0,0%
    119. Sub-Saharans
    15
    1
    0,0%
    120. Mesopotamians
    12
    1
    0,0%
    121. Galactic Emperials (Star Wars)
    11
    2
    0,0%
    122. New Zealanders
    11
    1
    0,0%
    123. Caribbeans
    10
    1
    0,0%
    124. Geordie
    10
    1
    0,0%
    125. Hopi
    10
    1
    0,0%
    126. Javans
    10
    1
    0,0%
    127. Mon
    10
    1
    0,0%
    128. Teutons
    10
    1
    0,0%
    129. Tocharians
    10
    1
    0,0%
    130. Tunguz
    10
    1
    0,0%
    131. Tunisians
    10
    1
    0,0%
    132. Columbians
    7
    1
    0,0%
    133. Slovakians
    7
    1
    0,0%
    134. Palestinians
    5
    1
    0,0%
    135. Sámi
    5
    1
    0,0%
    136. Hospitaliers
    4
    1
    0,0%
    137. Fatty Lumpkins
    2
    2
    0,0%
    138. Khwarizm
    2
    1
    0,0%
    Last edited by Locutus; November 30, 2001, 20:42.
    Administrator of WePlayCiv -- Civ5 Info Centre | Forum | Gallery

    Comment


    • #3
      Discussion, voting

      Okay guys, I recounted the list, as can be seen above. I deliberately counted exactly the same votes as in the last update of the previous thread (i.e. all votes up to Staszek, but all votes after Roland Ehnström were invalid under the new rules) and I will wait a few hours before updating the rest of the vote. This way everyone can see the effect of enforcing the new rules. Most notably, the Poles have lost almost 250 points but they only fell back 3 places on the overall ranking (from 12 to 15). Looks like even without a 'Polish invasion' we perfectly well recognize Poland as an important civ (though I'm sure the invasion helped a bit)...

      Here's a list of all people who for who's vote were counted under the old rules but are no longer valid under the new ones (20 in total):

      Bob Dornan (only 1 civ, 20 points)
      Rasputin (only 5 civs, 50 points)
      StSz (only voted 20 points)
      PGM (only 3 civs, 41 points)
      Orioles3386 (only voted for 4 civs)
      Adrien (only voted for 5 civs)
      krzysiek (only voted 55 points)
      Brad (only 2 civs, 40 points)
      Triped (only 1 civ, 20 points)
      MarsJan (only 1 civ, 20 points)
      Kalbarczyk (only voted for 4 civs)
      Henryk Przerwa (only 1 civ, 20 points)
      almaryk (only 1 civ, 20 points)
      bartuk (only 1 civ, 20 points)
      Maveus (only 1 civ, 20 points)
      vasyl (only 4 civs, 40 points)
      DZASKUL (only 1 civ, 20 points)
      borg (only 3 civs, 60 points)
      ogotai (only 3 civs, 40 points)
      Staszek (only 1 civ, 20 points)

      This doesn't yet include the people who's votes I haven't counted yet, I'll post their names next time when I update the ranking. If anyone wants to know if they still have points left or whatever, I refer to the Excel sheet I linked to above, it contains all the data collected in this poll, including the total number of points and civs that were voted for by each poster (who casted a valid vote).

      On Gramphos's request, I added percentages as a statistic for each civ. If anyone else knows of any other fun things to keep track off, let me know.

      For those of you who haven't done so already: keep on votin'...
      Administrator of WePlayCiv -- Civ5 Info Centre | Forum | Gallery

      Comment


      • #4
        edited:


        what a .......


        mistake

        My votes where counted

        but ok i still have those *20* left ..... now on what civ ....
        Last edited by Mankind; October 10, 2001, 08:39.
        Win98 ERROR 009: Press any key to continue or any other to quit
        f**k the f****n f*****s!
        I'am realy enjoing not talking to you...
        let's not talk again REAL soon...

        Comment


        • #5
          Locutus: Under the risk of provoking a new discussion, I'd like to say that, IMHO, the new rules should be applied from now on, and not be applied historically backwards. This is the standard conduct in such situations.
          I love the tick of the Geiger counter in the morning. It's the sound of... victory! :D
          LoD - Owner/Webmaster of civ.org.pl
          civ.org.pl's Discussion Forums and Multiplayer System for SMAC and Civs 2-4

          Comment


          • #6
            My updated votes:

            Australians 20
            Slavs 20
            Koreans 20
            Poles 20
            Spanish 15
            Ethiopians 15
            Hebrew 15
            Khmer 10
            Portugal 10
            Turks 10
            Polynesians 5
            TOTAL 160

            Comment


            • #7
              LoD,
              No, I strongly disagree. It's simply unfair if people who happened to have found this thread earlier have a lot more freedom in choosing their votes than people who happened to will find it later. The only way to make sure this thread is fair and consistent is if everyone votes by the same rules. People whose vote was declared invalid will simply have to vote again...
              Administrator of WePlayCiv -- Civ5 Info Centre | Forum | Gallery

              Comment


              • #8
                Alright .
                I love the tick of the Geiger counter in the morning. It's the sound of... victory! :D
                LoD - Owner/Webmaster of civ.org.pl
                civ.org.pl's Discussion Forums and Multiplayer System for SMAC and Civs 2-4

                Comment


                • #9
                  I am new.

                  Spain 20
                  Mongols 20
                  Vikings 20
                  Turks 20
                  Inca 20
                  Austrians/Austro-Hungarians 20
                  Phoenicians/Carthaginians 20
                  Arab 20
                  Das Ewige Friede ist ein Traum, und nicht einmal ein schöner /Moltke

                  Si vis pacem, para bellum /Vegetius

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Well done, Locutus, a great move! Now this poll should become what it was ment to be... or at least we could try to maintain it that way
                    Non-Leader of the Apolyton Anarchist Non-Party

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I am sorry, I think the new rules etc. are a good idea, but I am confused. I mean I've voted after Roland Ehnström (I guess), and I think my vote was legal. So now I am going to have to wait till the next update to se whether this has been incorperated, right?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        uh oh so my vote wasn't counted??? right?
                        so should I vote AGAIN, or just make notes such as
                        country x + 20 votes
                        country Y + 2 points???

                        or just new votes.... I think this would be easier

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Locutus, Now you have three posts in the beginning of the thread if it would be to long again

                          percentages with ',' and not '.' as a decimal separator. I thought I'd never see that on Internet. *Jumping up and down in ecstasy*

                          How long will it take for Mark to top this one?
                          Creator of the Civ3MultiTool

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Be Quicker,
                            Yes, everyone who voted after Roland Ehnström will have to wait until the next update to see (if) their voted (are) added to the ranking. In your case though I can assure you that they will be.

                            Dessloch,
                            Indeed, your vote was not valid according to the new rules. For those people who want to 'fix' their vote to fit the new rules, like you, I don't particularly care whether they post a 'new vote' or an 'update', whatever you prefer.
                            Administrator of WePlayCiv -- Civ5 Info Centre | Forum | Gallery

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Gramphos
                              Locutus, Now you have three posts in the beginning of the thread if it would be to long again
                              I'm not sure what you're trying to say here...

                              percentages with ',' and not '.' as a decimal separator. I thought I'd never see that on Internet. *Jumping up and down in ecstasy*
                              Oh, dang! Hadn't thought of that yet. I have a Dutch version of Excel, it automatically uses ','. Well, unless people have a real problem with that (and quite frankly I can't see why they should), I'm gonna have to leave it at this. It would probably involve a fair amount of work to fix that without screwing up all my other Excel documents (and this is of course how it *should* be ).
                              Administrator of WePlayCiv -- Civ5 Info Centre | Forum | Gallery

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X