Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Civ of the Week: Romans

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by d_dudy

    well, what's a knight again?
    Well, that´s what I mean: I think a Knight should overpower the Legion more decisively. Btw, are Crusaders still in? I am scared they might be not.
    and a night will have a movement rate that allows them to attack and retreat.
    Not really; they would need movement 3. (Move in, attack, move away. But that would be more like a horse archer.) With m=2, they will be exposed either before or after the attack.
    Now, if I ask myself: Who profits from a War against Iraq?, the answer is: Israel. -Prof. Rudolf Burger, Austrian Academy of Arts

    Free Slobo, lock up George, learn from Kim-Jong-Il.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Comrade Tribune
      Well, that´s what I mean: I think a Knight should overpower the Legion more decisively. Btw, are Crusaders still in? I am scared they might be not.
      Nope, Crusaders are not in.
      "Compromises are not always good things. If one guy wants to drill a five-inch hole in the bottom of your life boat, and the other person doesn't, a compromise of a two-inch hole is still stupid." - chegitz guevara
      "Bill3000: The United Demesos? Boy, I was young and stupid back then.
      Jasonian22: Bill, you are STILL young and stupid."

      "is it normal to imaginne dartrh vader and myself in a tjhreee way with some hot chick? i'ts always been my fantasy" - Dis

      Comment


      • #18
        Not really; they would need movement 3.
        No, a unit can retreat if it has two movement points and uses one to attack. To assure a safe retreat then you would need 3.

        Why do people forget the Pikemen's unique defense bonus that makes it better than a hoplite? It is X2 against units with multiple movement points!
        "I agree with everything i've heard you recently say-I hereby applaud Christantine The Great's rapid succession of good calls."-isaac brock
        "This has to be one of the most impressive accomplishments in the history of Apolyton, well done Chris"-monkspider (Refering to my Megamix summary)
        "You are redoing history by replaying the civs that made history."-Me

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Bill3000


          Nope, Crusaders are not in.
          BTW, Crusaders would be a great CSU, for example for Germans (IMHO their Golden Age was the Holy Roman Empire under Frederick Barbarossa, not WWII under Hitler )
          The problem with leadership is inevitably: Who will play God?
          - Frank Herbert

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Christantine The Great
            No, a unit can retreat if it has two movement points and uses one to attack. To assure a safe retreat then you would need 3.
            You didn´t quite get me. If it uses its first MP to attack, then it was open to being attacked the turn before ...
            Now, if I ask myself: Who profits from a War against Iraq?, the answer is: Israel. -Prof. Rudolf Burger, Austrian Academy of Arts

            Free Slobo, lock up George, learn from Kim-Jong-Il.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Martinus

              BTW, Crusaders would be a great CSU, for example for Germans (IMHO their Golden Age was the Holy Roman Empire under Frederick Barbarossa, not WWII under Hitler )
              Totally agreed. Crusaders would also be quite fitting for the French. The best Musketeers were actually Swedish (Gustaf Adolf´s).
              Now, if I ask myself: Who profits from a War against Iraq?, the answer is: Israel. -Prof. Rudolf Burger, Austrian Academy of Arts

              Free Slobo, lock up George, learn from Kim-Jong-Il.

              Comment


              • #22
                Romans are my favourite civ...
                Rome rules

                Comment


                • #23
                  It is unbalanced the stats of these three units:
                  Legion 3/3/1
                  Immortals 4/2/1
                  War elephant 4/3/2

                  The War elephant is an ancient unit (Alexander vs. Poros), and the most effective in defense and attack unit of the ancient age was the legion. The immortals could not beat the Greek hoplites ever it was the opposite (the 10.000 of the anabasis), but they are given 4 in attack, elephants did not beat the roman legions in Zama, and that was before the reforms of Marius, which made the legions even deadlier. In the ancient world, when the legions were reasonably led, they were never beaten. The stats should be changed, because the elephants never were as succesful as the legions, but in the game they are deadlier, and nobody is going to convince me that they are not an ancient unit.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    I think all three units are too strong, compared to Knights/Riders and probably even Pikes/Muskets.
                    Now, if I ask myself: Who profits from a War against Iraq?, the answer is: Israel. -Prof. Rudolf Burger, Austrian Academy of Arts

                    Free Slobo, lock up George, learn from Kim-Jong-Il.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Making the roman or greek unit any stronger would unbalance the game
                      Let us unite together as one nation, a world nation" - Gundam Wing

                      "The God of War will destroy all mortals whom dare stand in his way"

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        We are talking here about the special aspects of the different civilizations, if you want a balanced game you just turn off the special abilities and units. But if you talk about the value of the different units it is stupid that the immortals that were never able to defeat the Greek phalanx are stronger not only than the phalanx, but also than legions, which were the only ones that were able to beat the Greeks.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          I agree. The Mortals should be comparatively early, but comparatively weak.
                          Now, if I ask myself: Who profits from a War against Iraq?, the answer is: Israel. -Prof. Rudolf Burger, Austrian Academy of Arts

                          Free Slobo, lock up George, learn from Kim-Jong-Il.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Kurgan
                            We are talking here about the special aspects of the different civilizations, if you want a balanced game you just turn off the special abilities and units. But if you talk about the value of the different units it is stupid that the immortals that were never able to defeat the Greek phalanx are stronger not only than the phalanx, but also than legions, which were the only ones that were able to beat the Greeks.
                            I like the UUs but you have to balance them. They're already early enough you can get iron working in like 20 turns which is nothing so no one would ever be the indians or the babylians because their UU would suck. Anyways the Immortals and the War elepants will aready have a hard time defeating the legion and phlanx because if you remeber when you fortify a unit it has a 50% better defense rating
                            Let us unite together as one nation, a world nation" - Gundam Wing

                            "The God of War will destroy all mortals whom dare stand in his way"

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Comrade Tribune


                              You didn´t quite get me. If it uses its first MP to attack, then it was open to being attacked the turn before ...
                              Not necessarily. A legion two spaces away could move next to the knight, using its one MP, and the next turn they'd start off next to each other. The knight uses its first MP to attack, and then scoot.
                              "Chegitz, still angry about the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991?
                              You provide no source. You PROVIDE NOTHING! And yet you want to destroy capitalism.. you criminal..." - Fez

                              "I was hoping for a Communist utopia that would last forever." - Imran Siddiqui

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Sure; but I wouldn´t call that exactly a hit-and-run attack, if Your enemy has to come to You to make it work...
                                Now, if I ask myself: Who profits from a War against Iraq?, the answer is: Israel. -Prof. Rudolf Burger, Austrian Academy of Arts

                                Free Slobo, lock up George, learn from Kim-Jong-Il.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X