Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

British or English, Firaxis?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • British or English, Firaxis?

    In the FAQ section of civ3.com it says a civ civ3 will have is the english. In a screenshot though it says the british. Will it have the english or the british??

  • #2
    I think Firaxis has a tendency never to respond to a topic with Firaxis in the title, prove me wrong?
    It's candy. Surely there are more important things the NAACP could be boycotting. If the candy were shaped like a burning cross or a black man made of regular chocolate being dragged behind a truck made of white chocolate I could understand the outrage and would share it. - Drosedars

    Comment


    • #3
      English?/British?

      This is an interesting point.

      My bet would be the English - because the American designers probably have at most a sketchy idea of the difference between the English and the British.

      But as long as you can change the name of the English to the British, I'll be as happy as a pig in ****. I love the English but I'd rather be British and then English, if the game can support that.

      Best regards,

      ToD.MB
      Tod.MB

      Comment


      • #4
        English or British

        Also, Elizabeth I was ruler of England not Britain. (or is my history wrong which is quite probable??) I think that the player setup screen is meant to say british and that Firaxis have made a mistake.

        Comment


        • #5
          Ok, given that the British Empire in the 19th century was the British Empire, I still think that it will be England and not Britian in Civ3. In my opinion Ireland and Scotland might as well have been diplomatically conquerred by England to form this unified state, that lead down the road to such greatness.
          "What can you say about a society that says that God is dead and Elvis is alive?" Irv Kupcinet

          "It's easy to stop making mistakes. Just stop having ideas." Unknown

          Comment


          • #6
            Diplomatic conquest

            True Pythagoras!

            Scotland and Ireland were indeed 'diplomatically' conquered by England. Ireland was 'given' to the Normans by the Pope (what the Hell business was it of his?) and Scotland 'voluntarily' joined the Union in 1707: neither state was conquered in a stictly military sense, say like Poland and France, etc. in WWII.

            Yet, the Union of England/Wales and Scotland has produced a nation that was and is a great player in the world scene, whereas the England of the Anglo-Saxons and Normans wasn't really. This is why to me a British Civ rather than an Engish one makes sense.

            To define a great Civ, you might ask yourself the following questions:

            "What did the English do for the world, what acheivement is English?"

            "What did the British do for the world, what acheivement is Britlish?"

            Who's heard of the English Empire? (Though our friends in Wales and Scotland might term the U.K. as such).

            The historical Empire that acheived world power (1/4 of world's surface+ the seas) was the the British Empire - and I think the good chaps at Firaxis should make note of this.

            Regards,

            Tod.MB
            Tod.MB

            Comment


            • #7
              English/British

              Do you think that Firaxis have made a mistake in writing that they will use the English when they will actually use the British?

              Comment


              • #8
                "What did the English do for the world, what acheivement is English?"

                "What did the British do for the world, what acheivement is Britlish?"


                They are one and the same thing. It merely had a name change, such as going form EEC to EC to EU. So the achievements are the same, whilst the entity has grown.

                I would rather it be English than British, as the English as an entity have been around for over a millenium, the British Empire 150 years at most. Before 1800 it was just called the English Empire, and it was still refered to it as such until the 1850s.
                One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Diplomatic conquest

                  Originally posted by ToD.MB

                  To define a great Civ, you might ask yourself the following questions:
                  Who rules the waves? England or Britannia?
                  Which is preceded by 'Great', England or Britain?
                  Hasdrubal's Home.
                  Ceterum censeo Romam esse delendam.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Which is preceded by 'Great', England or Britain

                    Ahh, but London is Greater.
                    One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      England to Britain was merely the extention of english power to scotland...

                      I don't quite see why the two are separate civs...

                      The english civilisation began in it's present form (Magna Carta) in 1066 A.D when the Normans invaded and hasn't been successfully invaded since then by another people (our monarchs aren't too pure though).

                      I would love to see Edward Longshanks as leader of the English OR Cromwell

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        It was Englands parliamentary system that began to take in representatives from the Welsh/Scottish boroughs and countys, that were set up and divided by the English. It was the English Tudor lineage that ruled England, then later Britain. Certainly Scotsmen/Welshmen/Irishmen all contributed to the colonization and management of the British empire, but in the end the govt in London was the master with the Parliament and King of England at its head.
                        "What can you say about a society that says that God is dead and Elvis is alive?" Irv Kupcinet

                        "It's easy to stop making mistakes. Just stop having ideas." Unknown

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Pythagoras
                          It was Englands parliamentary system that began to take in representatives from the Welsh/Scottish boroughs and countys, that were set up and divided by the English. It was the English Tudor lineage that ruled England, then later Britain. Certainly Scotsmen/Welshmen/Irishmen all contributed to the colonization and management of the British empire, but in the end the govt in London was the master with the Parliament and King of England at its head.
                          Deary, deary me. The Scottish boroughs and counties were not set up by England. The Westminster Parliament did not begin to take in MPs from Scottish boroughs, Scotland had its own Parliament which eventually voted to merge with the English Parliament in order to form the new UK Parliament in 1707.

                          The Tudor dynasty ruled England - it never ruled Scotland and became extinct prior to the joining of the kingdoms. It wasn't English anyway - it was a Welsh dynasty.

                          When the crowns were united it was under the Scottish Stuart dynasty, not under English kings.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            The english civilisation began in it's present form (Magna Carta) in 1066 A.D

                            Uh?

                            The Norman invasion affected things like architecture, but the rule of law, the majority of nobles etc were still Saxon. Things like sherrifs was orignially a Saxon system for example.

                            Magna Carta was a century after 1066 IIRC. Are you confusing with Domesday book written during the second half of the eleventh century
                            One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Just checked

                              Magna Carta was signed at Runnymede in June 1215

                              I would love to see Edward Longshanks as leader of the English OR Cromwell

                              Now they were mean ******* .

                              No wonder the Scots, Welsh and Irish haven't given us glowing references.
                              One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X