Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

AU mod: The Keshik

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • AU mod: The Keshik

    The problem

    The Knight the first fast-moving offensive unit that does not require defensive support. It's appeal is that is can move into enemy territory and attack without the fear of getting slaughtered in a counterattack, and without having to wait for slow defenders to catch up.

    The Mongol UU is a Knight replacement with a reduced defense and cost. That means that Keshiks can't attack as effectively without defensive support, so they have to advance more slowly. Not only is this unfair to the Mongols, it's also historically inaccurate.

    Consider a vet Knight in enemy plains, attacked by a vet Medieval Infantry. The attacker will win 60% of the time, which results in an expected shield loss of 42.3. Now consider a Keshik in the same situation. The Medieval Infantry wins 80% of the time, which is an expected shield loss of 47.5. Surely a UU should give the Mongols a better deal than that!

    Possible Solution:

    Give the Keshik zero-range bombardment of 2.

    That means that it has a 50% chance of removing a hit point from an attacking Medieval Infantry, which improves its overall chance of defending from 20% to about 30%. That's an expected shield loss of 42.7, almost identical to that of a Knight in that situation!

    A nice element of flavor from this change is that the zero-range bombard is an ability given to Archer-type units in stock C3C, and the Keshik is actually a mounted Archer, according the unit graphics!

    So what do you think about the Keshik? Does it need some help, or are the Mongols doing fine as they are now? any other ideas?
    Last edited by alexman; January 16, 2004, 13:52.

  • #2
    What a stellar idea! If that one doesn't get support, I suggest dropping the cost further to make the expected shield loss equal or less than the knight.
    They were called the Mongol Horde - there should be a lot of them and cheaper = more, IMO.

    But the 0-range bombard is inspired and would be my first choice.
    "Just once, do me a favor, don't play Gray, don't even play Dark... I want to see Center-of-a-Black-Hole Side!!! " - Theseus nee rpodos

    Comment


    • #3
      I like this idea as well! Sounds like a good, creative solution to the problem. How does the estimated shield loss compare to it having a bombardment value of 3?

      -donZappo

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by ducki
        What a stellar idea!
        Actually, player1 suggested this two months ago:



        And I really like it.
        "As far as general advice on mod-making: Go slow as far as adding new things to the game until you have the basic game all smoothed out ... Make sure the things you change are really imbalances and not just something that doesn't fit with your particular style of play." - WesW

        Comment


        • #5
          Excellent idea (and I'm glad lockstep found player1's thread so I wouldn't have to go looking for it...).
          "Stuie has the right idea" - Japher
          "I trust Stuie and all involved." - SlowwHand
          "Stuie is right...." - Guynemer

          Comment


          • #6

            Comment


            • #7
              I like the zero-range bombard idea, too.

              The topic of Knight replacement UUs gets me thinking about Ansar Warriors. Anyone else think that what is basically a cheap Rider is a little too powerful?


              Dominae
              And her eyes have all the seeming of a demon's that is dreaming...

              Comment


              • #8
                Count me as another person who likes the idea of zero-range bombard for Keshiks.

                Regarding Ansars, I don't want to get in a game of "Let's tone down all the best UUs," and I don't view the Ansar as so much better than other first-tier UUs that we need to single it out. The cost difference between Ansars and Riders isn't huge; Arabia isn't Militaristic and so gets fewer promotions (and hence leaders) than China; and the Ansar is more vulnerable than the Rider on the admittedly relatively rare occasions when it is subject to counterattack.

                Nathan

                Comment


                • #9
                  Under consideration:

                  Yes/No: Give Keshiks a zero-range bombard strength of 2.

                  Voting on Friday.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    How about the cheaper shield cost idea as well? As a non-panel member I certainly take ducki's point about the 'horde' well.
                    Consul.

                    Back to the ROOTS of addiction. My first missed poll!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      We will revisit the cheaper cost proposal after the first version of the mod has been released. It's easier to decide on the cost of the unit after we have decided whether or not it will have zero-range bombard.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Gotcha.

                        How come you're always there, just as I post, ready to reply?
                        Consul.

                        Back to the ROOTS of addiction. My first missed poll!

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by alexman
                          Yes/No: Give Keshiks a zero-range bombard strength of 2.
                          Yes!
                          And her eyes have all the seeming of a demon's that is dreaming...

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Yes

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              YES.
                              "As far as general advice on mod-making: Go slow as far as adding new things to the game until you have the basic game all smoothed out ... Make sure the things you change are really imbalances and not just something that doesn't fit with your particular style of play." - WesW

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X