Well, I'm not the greatest Civ player, I only play on Prince, but I was wondering whether building a road before building the first city (in the absence of rivers) to provide trade is useful.Usually, I start a road on turn 1, move on turn 2 and build the city on turn 3. Is this wise/unwise? Anyhow, with a single settler, four cities is the most I've been able to get by 3000 BC without the lucky goody hut yielding a city. Is there a way to plant extra cities earlier then this?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Humble Beginnings
Collapse
X
-
quote:
Originally posted by Shadowstrike on 08-18-2000 09:49 PM
Anyhow, with a single settler, four cities is the most I've been able to get by 3000 BC without the lucky goody hut yielding a city. Is there a way to plant extra cities earlier then this?
yes. keep building settlers as a mad man.
And wait with building city improvments until you are finished expanding. And don't build an big army either.
Sorry i would explain better but my english is'nt so good. Try talking to ming and rah, they can explain it better
Comment
-
I think Rah/Ming would agree that looking around a little bit for a good city site gives you the benefits of 1) a possible early trade arrow special to assist in getting to Monarchy fast and 2) a possible defense and trade bonus river square and 3) a little info on the lay of the land. Waiting six to ten turns to start your first city can be a risk, but a good spot can make up for the delay quickly. If you have nothing to work with, build the road.
As an analyst who studies risks and their returns for a living, I'd say waiting has a good Sharpe ratio - good probability for extra return relative to the addition risk of not finding anything better and falling behind.
It's been said before but it always bears repeating: know the general special pattern. Open up the map editor and create a map of all water or all plains - the underlying pattern is always the same, it will be shifted in its entirety one direction or the other, but it is always recognizable. This can help you select a good location or guess which way to move your settler to find additional specials. Huts have a specific pattern as well - use the map editor to check it out.
[This message has been edited by Sten Sture (edited August 18, 2000).]Be the bid!
Comment
-
Prince is quite unfamiliar territory for me right now, years of playing only deity
Four cities is a lot, I could get down four but only with a two settler start which wasn't very common. Well, for early game on prince, you don't really need that much to win. Basically build warrior, horsemen, settler, settler, settler, settler, change if situation demands more defenses or anything. But the intial warrior on prince is enough for early defense. The horsemen will find you huts which will give you money/techs/units/cities. But build settlers like theres no tommorrow.
On deity though, I wonder if you had a poor starting location but didn't want to get behind, would a road on a grassland sheild provide enough not to be too far behind. Its only one less trade and one less production, sure that can make a difference but is it better than wasting a lot of time to find a better location with a whale, falling behind others... any thoughts from experts?
Comment
-
quote:
Originally posted by Caesar on 08-19-2000 12:07 AM
On deity though, I wonder if you had a poor starting location but didn't want to get behind, would a road on a grassland sheild provide enough not to be too far behind. Its only one less trade and one less production, sure that can make a difference but is it better than wasting a lot of time to find a better location with a whale, falling behind others... any thoughts from experts?
I would say it all depends on how you want to play. If you're inclined towards ICS, go ahead and plop down, you're just going to build more anyway, and will eventually work your way to the better sites, and in the mean time will have been productive.
For the more perfectionist stratagy, finding the good sites is worth any amount of waiting to get there. In the extreme case of OCC (One city challenge), I've explored into the 2000's to found my city, and been better off for it, and I'm sure others can echo similar sentiments.
For the middle ground, for which I used to always play, I would do exactly as you were doing - build a road or 2 before founding, maybe moving around just a little if i saw a special, but not worrying about it otherwise.
Ultimately, if you know what your doing, you're not going to fall far behind. The AI is programed to view you more favorably when you are weak, and it views you as weak if you wait to found your first city. Knowing how to take advantage of that is half the battle.
------------------
April Cantor: Sire, in order to expand further we must first gain favor of the King
SCG: darn, I've never really got the hang of that tribute thing, guess it will be a long time until i make prince
*goes off and starts gifting gold and techs*Insert witty phrase here
Comment
-
While I do not play at prince I think building a unit of road before founding a city makes sense if there is no other way to get trade arrows. If you try to get to Monarchy or some other goal as fast as possible an extra flask from each city can really help.
If you want to check it out start a game, enter cheat mode, reaveal the map, save the game and then play a partial game twice quitting when you get Monarchy. In the first run of the game don't build any roads; in the second run of the game build the roads prior to founding cities. See which gets you to monarchy first. When you do this locate your workers on the same squares in each run.If you can not think of a good reason to build something other than a caravan, build a caravan!
Comment
-
The only time i will build a road with one of my first two settlers is.
Founded capital on gold, i will road a shield grassland to help. and stall while i try to rushbuild a settler from my capital so i can take advantage of the non disbanding capital and keeping all the food feature.
Or if i just happen to be crossing a buffalo in the city range on my way out exploring.
Or if i'm moving a settler through a city, i may just build the road on the square next to the city since it's usually doesn't cost you a movement penalty if you travel on it the next turn.
In general though,(unless you're icsing) finding a trade special is what i'm looking for for my capital and building a road is just that many fewer squares you're gonna search. Finding a trade special even if you have to wander for 6-7 turns will still get you to monarchy faster that plopping down wherever. If there are no trade specials, then you just find production and try an ics strat. (only time i recommend it, personal bias, not based on brains)
RAHIt's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O
Comment
-
All that Rah has said might as well have been in Hebrew. Shheww, right over my head! I think you are saying to build your capital on a gold icon and when your city becomes a settler again, you get to keep the food? Build roads on buffalo I get though. Question though, does building your capital city on a river and making it your SCC make sense or this this a bad idea? Also, when building on a river, should you build on the little arrow icon or next to it? Experts?
Comment
-
Did anyone ever try to find the score difference for building your city a turn later?
As I don't have time myself, is there a volunteer somewhere around here who wants to try this? I guess it would be best to play this without opponents (=> put them on other maps in ToT) and keep expanding the same way in both games, to minimize side effects. (This is remarkably important, so maybe its best, though it could be very boring, to play the games turn by turn simulteaneously). I suggest one should try this on a large continental map, with a large land mass, on deity as only the best players will possibly be interested in these (minor?) gains. Any idea what the final score difference might be? Somewhere around 10% looks reasonable to me. Anyone for the try?
Comment
-
I usually build my capital or one of my early cities to be my SSC. I choose the location by finding trade specials and trade boosting terrain (mostly ocean and rivers coupled with whale or gold). By the way, what should my early priorities in tech be? I usually go first for Monarchy, then Bronze Working (Colossus), then Trade (picking up Pottery by the way) then Monotheism, then Astronomy, then Invention. Is the the best path? Can anyone show me a better one?*grumbles about work*
Comment
-
quote:
Originally posted by Shadowstrike on 08-20-2000 08:22 PM
I usually build my capital or one of my early cities to be my SSC. I choose the location by finding trade specials and trade boosting terrain (mostly ocean and rivers coupled with whale or gold). By the way, what should my early priorities in tech be? I usually go first for Monarchy, then Bronze Working (Colossus), then Trade (picking up Pottery by the way) then Monotheism, then Astronomy, then Invention. Is the the best path? Can anyone show me a better one?
You could take a look at Paul's OCC page, http://members.home.nl/paulvdb/occ.htm, as that is the ultimate SSC. Monotheism is a sidetrack for OCC since you only need to keep 1 city happy. In his path key techs also include University, Theory of Gravity (Ike's college), Automobile (Superhighways) and Computers (research lab). If you do it right, you can have all that and still have the colossus in effect.
------------------
April Cantor: Sire, in order to expand further we must first gain favor of the King
SCG: darn, I've never really got the hang of that tribute thing, guess it will be a long time until i make prince
*goes off and starts gifting gold and techs*Insert witty phrase here
Comment
Comment