Why? For competitive reasons, most play MP at either King or Emperor level, thus it is not as vital as in a deity game to have this wonder. Plus, IMO, your happiness tactic should hinge on trade and luxeries inherient to a democracy, not Mikes or Bach. They take time that could be spent building settlers and roads and marketplaces. In the grander scheme, you'll be better off without them, IF you do your trading right and don't make war [keep defense and have a powerful ally, but warfare in the early times is foolhearty.].
------------------
Elizer R. McGreen
------------------
Elizer R. McGreen

It probably ranks up there with Adam Smith's in terms of usefulness. As for representative governments, I find Mike's pays for itself in almost no time flat. I can even forgo building colliseums with proper trade routes. In a large civilization, the savings there are huge. As Ming stated in a similar thread, the advanced governments are pretty well balanced, allowing each person to play his or her own way. And most of the wonders are geared to be useful in some, but not all environments. Its like people who find Women's Sufferage worthless. If you play a republic, you can use that wonder to make almost any city a virtual Shake's city, because you'll never have any unhappiness due to troop movements.

Comment